A Daughter-In-Law Is An Example Of What Kind Of Relative?

A Daughter-In-Law Is An Example Of What Kind Of Relative
Close relative close relative means parent, child, sibling, spouse, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, brother-in-law, daughter-in-law, or sister-in-law.

Which of the following types of marriage is a relationship between only two partners?

Polygamy (from Late Greek πολυγαμία ( polugamía ) “state of marriage to many spouses”) is the practice of marrying multiple spouses, When a man is married to more than one wife at the same time, sociologists call this polygyny, When a woman is married to more than one husband at a time, it is called polyandry,

  • In contrast to polygamy, monogamy is marriage consisting of only two parties.
  • Like “monogamy”, the term “polygamy” is often used in a de facto sense, applied regardless of whether a state recognizes the relationship.
  • In sociobiology and zoology, researchers use polygamy in a broad sense to mean any form of multiple mating,

Worldwide, different societies variously encourage, accept or outlaw polygamy. In societies which allow or tolerate polygamy, in the vast majority of cases the form accepted is polygyny. According to the Ethnographic Atlas Codebook (1998), of 1,231 societies noted, 588 had frequent polygyny, 453 had occasional polygyny, 186 were monogamous and 4 had polyandry – although more recent research suggests that polyandry may occur more commonly than previously thought.

In cultures which practice polygamy, its prevalence among that population often correlates with social class and socioeconomic status. From a legal point of view, in many countries, although the law only recognises monogamous marriages (a person can only have one spouse, and bigamy is illegal), adultery is not illegal, leading to a situation of de facto polygamy being allowed, although without legal recognition for non-official “spouses”.

Scientific studies classify the human mating system as primarily monogamous, with the cultural practice of polygamy in the minority, based both on surveys of world populations, and on characteristics of human reproductive physiology. Polygamy (taking the form of polygyny) is most common in a region known as the “polygamy belt” in West Africa and Central Africa, with the countries estimated to have the highest polygamy prevalence in the world being Burkina Faso, Mali, Gambia, Niger and Nigeria,

What is the goal of Bridewealth?

Bridewealth Marriage in Sub-Saharan Africa – Across sub-Saharan Africa, as elsewhere in the world, marriage has traditionally been viewed as the union of two families, rather than the joining of two individuals ( Abdul-Korah, 2014 ; Caldwell & Caldwell, 1987 ; Dekker & Hoogeveen, 2002 ).

In many traditional African societies, parents (and/or other family members) arranged their children’s marriages, and in some cases, did so when their children were young or even before they were born ( Meekers, 1992 ; Murdock, 1959 ; Phillips, 2018 ). Provision of bridewealth – the transfer of cash and/or goods (typically livestock) from the husband’s to the wife’s family – is part of the traditional marriage process in most African societies, particularly in patrilineal ones ( Goody, 1973 ; Murdock, 1967 ).

This payment solidifies the alliance between the husband’s and the wife’s kinship groups and creates financial transfer systems that families use to lend or give money and/or food to each other during periods of financial difficulty or low agricultural output ( Abdul-Korah, 2014 ; Dekker & Hoogeveen, 2002 ).

  • Because bridewealth payments position marriage as a contract between two extended families, they also de-emphasize the importance of the couple relationship.
  • Bridewealth payment compensates the wife’s family for the loss of her labor, both domestic and agricultural, and formalizes the transfer of sexual and reproductive rights to the husband’s family – any children from the marriage become part of the husband’s lineage.

Bridewealth thus symbolizes reproductive control of the wife by the husband and his family, as well as the dependence of husbands on older men in the family who negotiate the marriage and control young men’s access to resources ( Anderson, 2007 ). This practice can also be seen as part of a community system because payment received for a woman may then be used to pay her brother’s bridewealth ( Kuper, 1950 ).

Despite the universality of marriage, marital dissolution, mainly through divorce, is quite common across the subcontinent: Approximately one-third of first marriages in sub-Saharan Africa end in divorce within 20 years of marriage ( Clark & Brauner-Otto, 2015 ). Because bridewealth is expected to be returned upon divorce, it puts a monetary price on women’s compliance with marital norms and may deter them from leaving unhappy or abusive marriages ( Ansell, 2001 ).

Bridewealth can also limit a woman’s decision-making power and autonomy by legitimizing a mindset of control and ownership by her husband that reinforces traditional gender roles and women’s subservience to men ( Abdul-Korah, 2014 ; Dodoo & Frost, 2008 ; Dodoo, Horne, & Biney, 2014 ).

The institution of bridewealth changed substantially over the 20 th and early 21 st century in much of the subcontinent. Traditionally, bridewealth payment was made in livestock or other valuable goods; however, with the development of cash economies since the colonial era, bridewealth payments have been increasingly made in cash ( Abdul-Korah, 2014 ; Casale & Posel, 2010 ; Jensen, 2015 ; Posel & Rudwick, 2014 ).

Payments have also become more individualized. Evidence from several African countries, such as Ghana, Kenya, and Zimbabwe, indicates that the expectations of payment increasingly fall on the groom himself rather than his family ( Abdul-Korah, 2014 ; Ansell, 2001 ; Ferraro, 1983 ; Jensen, 2015 ; Posel & Rudwick, 2014 ).

What is the goal of Bridewealth quizlet?

It stabilizes the marriage through establishment of mutual, vested interest. Bridewealth is prevalent in many African societies and parts of the Middle East and frequently means that the groom’s family gives cattle, cash, or other goods to the family of the bride-to-be.

What are the two types of descent groups distinguished by anthropologists?

Download: | – A Daughter-In-Law Is An Example Of What Kind Of Relative Bilateral kin often attend life cycle events, such as a wedding. Japanese wedding party at Meiji Shrine in Tokyo. Credit: Sgroey, CC BY-SA 4.0 license. Unlike some other species, human adults rarely live in isolation. Families, minimally consisting of at least one parent and one child, are customary in all societies and are commonly the building blocks of larger families and kin groups.

  1. But how large these groups are and how they are composed varies considerably.
  2. In the module we discuss explanations and predictors of extended families versus independent families.
  3. In this module, we consider explanations and predictors of variation in marital residence patterns, the formation and composition of larger kin groups, and the terms used for kin.

We then discuss consequences of variation in kinship patterns and we close with questions for which we have as yet few answers. Let’s start with a thought experiment. If you are a parent and your children are old enough to leave home, you might worry about how you will manage when you are too old or too sick to do much productive work.

You would be particularly worried if there was no government-sponsored program to support you in such circumstances. In either case, you might want your children to live with you or near you. But there is a problem with this wish. Assuming that your children will want to marry or have a partner to live with, some set of children from some set of parents will have to leave home.

Every parent faces a dilemma then–who shall go and who shall stay? Societies appear to have created rules to solve this dilemma. These rules are called, If we look at a sample of societies in the anthropological record, the two most common rules specify the gender expected to stay and the gender expected to leave.

A rule specifies that a daughter stays with or near her family after marriage and her husband moves to where her family resides. A rule specifies that a son stays with or near his family after marriage and his wife moves to where his family resides. These two marital residence rules account for about 85% of the cases in the ethnographic record, although patrilocal residence is more common as illustrates.

Notice that we used the phrase ” live with or near ” to describe where a couple lives after marriage. This is because there are two common possibilities: the married couple becomes part of an extended family household consisting of two or more constituent families (“live with”) or the married couple forms a new household adjacent to or very near one of their parents (“live near”).

There are a few other marital residence patterns that are less common: describes an apparent more-or-less equal choice for the married couple to have two options (usually between matrilocal and patrilocal residence); describes a pattern where the couple lives with or near the husband’s mother’s brother (“avuncu” derived from the Latin for maternal uncle– avunculus ); and (“neo” means “new” in Greek) describes a pattern where married children leave their parents’ homes and live in a new place separate from either set of parents.

The rarest residence pattern, (“duo” means two in Latin), describes a situation where the married couple lives separately–the wife and the husband both remain in their natal homes. Note that although duolocal residence may give parents their wish to have all their children stay at home, the rarity of such a residence pattern suggests that it isn’t a very workable solution for most societies. A Daughter-In-Law Is An Example Of What Kind Of Relative Types of Residence, Using data from Murdock and Wilson (1972) coded for the 186 society Standard Cross-Cultural Sample, Figure 2 shows the percentage of occurrence of each of five major types of residence. Notice that in about 95% of the societies in the anthropological record, married couples have lived with or near kin (only about 5% are neolocal).

  • Presumably that is because help from family kin has been needed for survival and well-being.
  • But in many, if not most societies, kinship relationships beyond the family are also important.
  • All societies have ways of reckoning and tracking people you are related to.
  • Inship terminology is used to describe classes of relatives (such as aunts, uncles, grandmothers, grandfathers, and cousins) and most people can name a considerable number of consanguineal (by blood) and affinal (by marriage) relatives when asked.

Societies differ in the importance of these larger sets of relatives and how much they can be expected to help you or whether they can call on you to help them. In some societies, the family and maybe a few close relatives are the largest effective group of kin. A Daughter-In-Law Is An Example Of What Kind Of Relative Bilateral Kinship, Since a bilateral kinship system is ego-centered, it changes with different reference points. The kindred for sister and brother #20 and #21 represented by the blue line includes the parents (#9, 10), grandparents (#1-4), aunts and uncles (#7, 8, 11-12), any spouses of aunts and uncles, and first cousins (#16-19, 22-25).

  1. The red, dotted line represents sister and brother #24’s and #25’s kindred.
  2. Notice how it includes some of the same people from 20 and 21’s kindred (#3, 4, 9-13, 20-25), but also includes additional people (#5, 6, 14, 15, 26-29).
  3. Note: Circles are used for females and triangles for males.
  4. Marriages are indicated by an equal (=) sign and children by a downward vertical line.

Siblings are connected by a horizontal line. Anthropologists describe two main types of kinship principles that form larger groups: and, American society is characterized by bilateral (literally “two sided”) kinship. Think of the people you might invite to a wedding.

Besides your own family, you would likely invite your kin on both sides of the family, such as your father’s brothers and sisters, your mother’s brothers and sisters, their children (your first cousins), your father’s parents, your mother’s parents (your grandparents) and likely their siblings. Such a group is referred to as a,

Anthropologists refer to kindreds as being centered around a particular individual () because aside from siblings, no other people have the same people in their kindred. See, In contrast, rules of descent result in clear, unambiguous groups of kin. Such rules trace kinship relationships linearly or backwards in time to a known or presumed ancestor.

In doing so, some close relatives are omitted. The two most common rules of descent are and and these two rules create patrilineal kin groups and matrilineal kin groups respectively (these two rules of descent are both types of since they are based on affiliation through only one gender). With a patrilineal rule, all children (male and female) become affiliated with their father’s kin group, usually named for a male ancestor or a more symbolic name such as the name of an animal.

Note that when a unilineal kinship principle is invoked, some close relatives are excluded. For instance, with a patrilineal kin group principle, your mother is usually not included, nor are her brothers and sisters and their children. And even on your father’s side, his sisters’ children are usually excluded since they take their patrilineal membership from their father, not from their mother. A Daughter-In-Law Is An Example Of What Kind Of Relative Patrilineal descent, Members of the same kin group are shaded blue. In patrilineal descent, siblings #4 and #5 are affiliated with their father’s (#2) patrilineal kin group. Individuals #12-13 and #21-22 are also affiliated because membership in that group is passed to them through their fathers. A Daughter-In-Law Is An Example Of What Kind Of Relative Matrilineal descent, Members of the same kin group are shaded yellow. In matrilineal descent, siblings #4 and #5 are affiliated with their mother’s (#1) matrilineal kin group. Individuals #8-9 and #15-16 are also affiliated because membership in that group is passed to them through their mothers.

  • In societies with unilineal descent, membership in a kin group is typically assigned at birth and if you are asked “to what kin group do you belong?” you can give the name of that group by either the name of an ancestor or by another name (such as the Bear Clan).
  • Matrilineal descent is based on the opposite affiliation principle.

Siblings affiliate with the kin group of their mother and their father is excluded along with his brothers and sisters and their children. And, on the mother’s side, her brothers’ children are excluded since they take their matrilineal membership from their mother.

  • Some societies have both matrilineal groups and patrilineal groups.
  • Such societies are referred to as having,
  • Such societies are believed to be transitioning from one form of descent to the other.
  • Each person acquires a matrilineal affiliation as well as a patrilineal affiliation.
  • If you imagine overlaying the patrilineal and matrilineal charts on each other, you can see that unlike bilateral kinship, some close relatives are still excluded from either group.

Some societies have, Like unilineal descent, kin groups are formed with reference to ancestors in the past, but in societies with ambilineal descent, affiliation with a group of kin can be traced through the mother or through the father. A Daughter-In-Law Is An Example Of What Kind Of Relative Kin groups and lineages sometimes live in the same dwelling. For the matrilineal Iroquois, the core members of the matrilineage traditionally lived together in large longhouses with each constituent family occupying its own space. Credit: Marina Markel, CC BY-SA 4.0 license.

Marital residence is thought to be the basic building block of larger kin group structures because the rule of residence affects who lives together in a community or neighborhood; it is more likely that connections can be traced when members of a potential kin group live together. What does cross-cultural research tell us about what predicts and what might explain variation in marital residence? The major contrast in residence patterns is between matrilocal residence and patrilocal residence, the two most common patterns.

Not only are these two patterns the most common cross-culturally, but these two patterns provide the most contrast on which gender (female or male) is asked to relocate from the home they grew up in to their spouse’s parent’s place of residence. A long-held assumption is that residential variation (matrilocal vs.

Higher male contribution to subsistence does not generally predict patrilocal residence nor does higher female contribution to subsistence generally predict matrilocal residence (;, )

However, subsistence contribution is predictive of residence in certain circumstances.

Higher male subsistence contribution predicts patrilocal (versus matrilocal) residence in Native North American societies (; ), In a worldwide sample of hunter-gatherers, higher male subsistence contribution predicts patrilocal residence and higher female subsistence contribution predicts matrilocal residence (), Why? C. Ember suggests that the importance of knowledge of wild species’ locations may give increased impetus for parents to keep their son (or daughter) home after marriage if they do more of the subsistence work. The hunter-gatherer finding and the North American finding are probably related considering that North America has a high proportion of hunter-gatherer societies. Extremely high male contribution to subsistence predicts patrilocality ()

A Daughter-In-Law Is An Example Of What Kind Of Relative Contrary to long-held assumptions, cross-cultural research has not found support for the idea that the gender contributing most to primary subsistence predicts marital residence. When individual cases are looked at they may appear to fit the long-held assumption.

For example, Maasai women, who live in a patrilocal society, traditionally collected firewood and performed a lot of other domestic chores, including childcare, but men were largely responsible for animal husbandry, the main subsistence activity of the Maasai. Credit: Yulia Avdeeva, CC BY-SA 4.0 license If subsistence contribution is not a strong predictor of matrilocal versus residence, what is? In cross-cultural research to date, the strongest and most consistent predictors relate to patterns of warfare, particularly whether warfare is internal to the society (that is, occurs between subgroups) or is mostly or purely external (that is, largely or purely with other societies).

Here is what cross-cultural research has uncovered:

Patrilocal residence is predicted by internal warfare, whereas matrilocal residence is predicted by purely external warfare (; ; ; ; ),

A closely related finding is that higher levels of internal war predict patrilocality, and higher levels of external war predict matrilocality (), Focusing primarily on matrilineal descent, Shenk et al. () find that internal war is associated with a shift away from matrilineal descent.

Societies with a history of migration into new territory within the 500 years before the time of description will tend to be matrilocal rather than patrilocal (, ), Note that migration almost always involves offensive warfare by the intruders. Why may warfare be related this way? Although both the Embers and Divale had the same results–namely, that internal warfare predicts patrilocality, and purely external war predicts matrilocality, they suggest very different theories to explain the relationship. The Embers suggest that warfare patterns influence residence patterns, while Divale suggests that residence patterns influence type of warfare. The Embers (), noting the prevalence of warfare in the anthropological record, suggest that parental concerns about defense and protection override their considerations of how much daughters or sons contribute to the economy. The Embers’ theory is that if warfare is internal and at least sometimes close to home, parents would not want their sons to move away at marriage regardless of whether their subsistence contribution was low or high. Presumably, sons would be more reliable defenders than sons-in-law. However, if warfare were purely external, presumably sons-in-laws, having no conflicts of interest between their home village and their wives’ villages, would be willing and able defenders of their in-laws. If defense were not a consideration, the Embers suggest that subsistence contribution would come back into play and would influence residence choices. Indeed, when warfare is purely external, division of labor predicts residence (), Divale’s theory is quite different. Given the greater frequency of patrilocal residence, Divale assumes that patrilocal residence is “normal” and that only matrilocal residence needs to be explained. Divale suggests that when related males are localized, they form fraternal interest groups with strong internal loyalties to their own kin and few ties to other communities. This makes them prone to internal fighting when disputes arise. Divale theorizes that matrilocal residence arises when a group tries to move into new territory. If they are going to succeed in their intrusion, matrilocal residence, by scattering related males into different communities, provides a mechanism to minimize internal warfare and increases chances of migrating successfully.C. Ember () questions whether it is plausible that people would know that switching to matrilocality would create internal peace. She points out that while matrilocal societies are more likely to have recently migrated, only about half of migrating societies are matrilocal; the rest are patrilocal, suggesting that migration is not a sufficient condition for matrilocality to develop. In light of Divale’s findings regarding migration and noting two additional findings (matrilocal societies usually have less than 21,000 people, and small size predicts purely external war), C. Ember () suggests that matrilocal societies are likely to come from the pool of small societies that have recently migrated that also developed higher female contribution to subsistence, perhaps because men are heavily engaged in fighting when work has to be done. As an aside, the fact that matrilocal societies have recently migrated suggests that they are more successful in warfare.

A different dimension of residential variation is the degree to which a society follows one pattern of (in which a married couple lives with or near a relative related by blood to one of the spouses–matrilocality, patrilocality or avunculocality) versus regularly following more than one pattern.

Following more than one pattern is called residence when two choices are more-or-less equal. In between the two extremes of unilocal residence and bilocal residence is having a frequent alternative residence pattern, such as being predominantly patrilocal, but having matrilocal residence as an alternative or being predominantly matrilocal with a frequent patrilocal alternative.

is a more general term that considers a frequent alternative and bilocality together to contrast with unilocal residence. What predicts multilocal residence?

Severe and sudden loss of population due to introduced diseases predicts multilocal residence (, using a worldwide sample;, using a hunter-gatherer sample) Why? Elman Service () suggested that sudden and severe loss of population makes it difficult to follow a unilocal rule because the requisite individuals may not be alive. Given the need to live near kin, couples may have to live with other relatives. Notice that this theory assumes that in most anthropologically-described societies people need to live with or near kin for survival. The more equality in inheritance by females and males, the more likely the society has multilocal residence () Why? George Peter Murdock () suggested that if either the woman or man can inherit, couples may choose to live with the relatives with more wealth or higher status. (While the relationship is significant, it is fairly weak and when depopulation is controlled it is no longer predictive.) Migratory band societies (or those lacking much agriculture) are more likely to have multilocal residence (; ; ) Why? Earlier theorists such as Eggan () suggest that hunter-gatherers are likely to need more flexibility because resources seasonally fluctuate or are unpredictable. Consistent with the unpredictability hypothesis, among hunter-gatherers, those with bilocal residence are more likely than those with unilocal residence to have higher variation in annual precipitation () Very small community size predicts bilocal or multilocal residence amongst hunter-gatherers (), Korotayev () finds the same relationships looking at a world-wide sample that includes all types of subsistence. Why? Following reasoning by Anderson (), Steward (), and Lee (), C. Ember () suggests that in very small communities, defined as less than 50 people, it is very unlikely to have a fairly equal sex-ratio for those of marriageable age. This means that a community trying to follow a unilocal rule could quickly end up with too many in-marrying spouses or lose too many out-marrying spouses. To maintain a fairly consistent size, multilocal residence may be more adaptive. Among hunter-gatherers, the more resources are unpredictable, the greater the likelihood of multilocal residence () Why? Implicit in the theory suggested by Forde (), Eggan (, ), Anderson () and Lee () is the idea that alternative residence patterns provide a way for couples to move to other bands where resources are more abundant at any given time.C. Ember () used variation in rainfall predictability to measure resource unpredictability for hunter-gatherers.

As we noted earlier, the vast majority of societies in the anthropological record had some form of residence where couples live with or near kin. Many scholars have noted that the form of residence that many in the world are used to today–neolocal residence–is probably largely a product of recent times.

For example, Goode () thought that industrialization gave impetus to neolocality because it often requires people to move to where jobs are located, but also lessens dependence on one’s own family by increasing economic opportunities for job seekers. While industrial societies do tend to have neolocal residence, Melvin Ember () suggested that kin ties may be weakened before industrialization by the introduction of money as a medium of exchange, particularly when people can earn money through their labor outside of regular subsistence activities.

Indeed, both the presence of money as a medium of exchange and the presence of industrialization is a predictor of neolocal residence ( on commercial exchange; on industrialization), Ember () suggests that the rise of commercial exchange makes it possible for individuals to sell their labor and/or their products in order to buy what they need to live.

  • Avunculocal residence, where the couple lives with or near the husband’s mother’s brother, is the only major form of residence where couples live with a relative other than a parent.
  • Avunculocal residence is difficult to understand unless you know that it exists in the context of matrilineal descent.

We will return to the possible predictors of avunculocal residence after discussing matrilineal descent in the next section.

What is it called when two people live together but are not married?

Living together – Although there is no legal definition of living together, it generally means to live together as a couple without being married. Couples who live together are sometimes called common-law partners. This is just another way of saying a couple are living together.

See also:  Which Of The Following Statements Is True Of Mistakes In Contract Law?

You might be able to formalise aspects of your status with a partner by drawing up a legal agreement called a cohabitation contract or living together agreement. A living together agreement outlines the rights and obligations of each partner towards each other. If you make a living together agreement, you should also make a legal agreement about how you share your property – this is called a ‘declaration of trust’.

If you want to make a living together agreement or a declaration of trust, you should get help from a family law solicitor. You can contact your nearest Citizens Advice for help to find a solicitor.

What do you call a married couple with a girlfriend?

1. A throuple isn’t the same as an open relationship. – First things first, a little clarification on exactly what a throuple is and is not. A throuple is:

A balanced, consensual, and committed relationship between three partners

A throuple is NOT:

  • An opportunity to be in a relationship and have sex with people who are not their partner
  • A threesome, or merely sex between three people

Thanks to the recent increase in visibility of the entire sexual spectrum (hooray!), the throuple (“three” + “couple”) is gaining more and more recognition, as are other forms of polyamory, the umbrella term for relationships involving more than two people.

  • This content is imported from poll.
  • You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
  • Throuples can be made up of people of any gender identity and any sexual orientation who choose to be together, Spector says.
  • Love is love, right?) That said, Spector says that most of the throuples she’s seen involve a married couple or long-term twosome who choose to add a third person—typically a man and woman who then bring in another woman.

Some consider themselves straight; others call themselves bisexual. Psst, sexuality is fluid in Hollywood too. See who’s spoken up about their attractions: She also sees throuples made up of people who don’t conform to any gender, folks who consider themselves, and those who identify as homosexual. But labels aren’t important, she notes. (Cosign.)

Who pays the dowry in a marriage?

A dowry is a payment, such as property or money, paid by the bride’s family to the groom or his family at the time of marriage. Dowry contrasts with the related concepts of bride price and dower, While bride price or bride service is a payment by the groom, or his family, to the bride, or her family, dowry is the wealth transferred from the bride, or her family, to the groom, or his family.

  1. Similarly, dower is the property settled on the bride herself, by the groom at the time of marriage, and which remains under her ownership and control.
  2. Dowry is an ancient custom that is already mentioned in some of the earliest writings, and its existence may well predate records of it.
  3. Dowries continue to be expected and demanded as a condition to accept a marriage proposal in some parts of the world, mainly in parts of Asia, The custom of dowry is most common in cultures that are strongly patrilineal and that expect women to reside with or near their husband’s family ( patrilocality ).

Dowries have long histories in Europe, South Asia, Africa, and other parts of the world.

Who paid bride price in the Bible?

7 incredible Bible facts about bride price that will surprise you For many Africans, the tradition of the bride price payment became a subject of serious controversy. If God specifically gave this law as a condition for marriage, or is it a man-made tradition? Time to find out the truth! A Daughter-In-Law Is An Example Of What Kind Of Relative 1. Bride price is not a condition for marriage but only as a penalty for rape. Exodus 22:16-17: “If a man seduces a virgin who is not pledged to be married and sleeps with her, he must pay the bride-price, and she shall be his wife. If her father absolutely refuses to give her to him, he must still pay the bride-price for virgins.” Deuteronomy 22:28-29: “If a man happens to meet a virgin who is not pledged to be married and rapes her and they are discovered, he shall pay her father fifty shekels of silver.

  • He must marry the young woman,for he has violated her.
  • He can never divorce her as long as he lives.” You can still pay the bride price and still be denied the woman to be your wife by her father.
  • At the same time, if the man has never slept with the woman, there should be no need to pay money for her.2.

There was never ever a place in the Bible where God commanded the bride’s parent to present a price. It is the groom’s responsibility to bring whatever for the lady he wants to marry. For example, in the Bible was Isaac’s marriage to Rebekah. There was no monetary exchange or penalty between the two families.

Affordable gifts were given to Rebekkah’s family by Abraham (but not demanded by Rebekkah’s family). Read Genesis 24:52-54.3. Bride price, according to the Bible, is all about virgins. Genesis 24:15-16: “Before he had finished praying, Rebekah came out with her jar on her shoulder. She was the daughter of Bethuel son of Milkah, who was the wife of Abraham’s brother Nahor.

The woman was very beautiful, a virgin; no man had ever slept with her. She went down to the spring, filled her jar and came up again.” 4. Payment of monetary bride price is a tradition and not a direct commandment from God. In some countries like India, a woman actually pays a dowry for the groom and not the other way round.5.

What is the main intention of marriage?

References –

  1. ^ Haviland, William A.; Prins, Harald E.L.; McBride, Bunny; Walrath, Dana (2011). Cultural Anthropology: The Human Challenge (13th ed.). Cengage Learning. ISBN 978-0-495-81178-7, “A nonethnocentric definition of marriage is a culturally sanctioned union between two or more people that establishes certain rights and obligations between the people, between them and their children, and between them and their in-laws.”
  2. ^ Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2008, Vol.1, p.1353, US Department of State.
  3. ^ Baten, Joerg; de Pleijt, Alexandra M. (2018). “Girl power Generates Superstars in Long-term Development: Female Autonomy and Human Capital Formation in Early Modern Europe”. CEPR Working Paper,13348,
  4. ^ Oxford English Dictionary 11th Edition, “marriage”
  5. ^ “Online Etymology Dictionary”, Etymonline.com.
  6. ^ Jump up to: a b c Bell, Duran (1997). “Defining Marriage and Legitimacy” (PDF), Current Anthropology,38 (2): 237–54. doi : 10.1086/204606, JSTOR 2744491, S2CID 144637145, Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 May 2017, Retrieved 6 April 2013,
  7. ^ Gerstmann, Evan. Same-sex Marriage and the Constitution, p.22 (Cambridge University Press, 2004).
  8. ^ Westermarck, Edward (1 April 2003). History of Human Marriage 1922, Kessinger Publishing.p.71. ISBN 978-0-7661-4618-1,
  9. ^ Westermarck, Edward (1936). The Future of Marriage in Western Civilisation, Books for Libraries Press.p.3. ISBN 978-0-8369-5304-6,
  10. ^ Notes and Queries on Anthropology, Royal Anthropological Institute.1951.p.110.
  11. ^ Gough, E. Kathleen (1959). “The Nayars and the Definition of Marriage”. Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland,89 (1): 23–34. doi : 10.2307/2844434, JSTOR 2844434, Nuer female-female marriage is done to keep property within a family that has no sons. It is not a form of lesbianism.
  12. ^ Gough, Kathleen (1968). “The Nayars and the Definition of Marriage”. In Paul Bohannan & John Middleton (ed.). Marriage, Family and Residence, New York: Natural History Press.p.68.
  13. ^ Leach, Edmund (December 1955). “Polyandry, Inheritance and the Definition of Marriage”. Man,55 (12): 183. doi : 10.2307/2795331, JSTOR 2795331,
  14. ^ Lung, Tang (2014). “Marriage of Inanna and Dumuzi”, World History Encyclopedia, World History Encyclopedia.
  15. ^ Jump up to: a b Goody, Jack (1976). Production and Reproduction: A Comparative Study of the Domestic Domain, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.p.7.
  16. ^ Roes, Frans L. (1992). “The Size of Societies, Monogamy, and Belief in High Gods Supporting Human Morality”. Tijdschrift voor Sociale Wetenschappen,37 (1): 53–58.
  17. ^ “The Demographics of Remarriage”, Pew Research Center’s Social & Demographic Trends Project,14 November 2014, Retrieved 28 June 2021,
  18. ^ Fox, Robin (1997). Reproduction & Succession: Studies in Anthropology, Law and Society, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.p.34.
  19. ^ Simpson, Bob (1998). Changing Families: An Ethnographic Approach to Divorce and Separation, Oxford: Berg.
  20. ^ Jump up to: a b Zeitzen, Miriam Koktvedgaard (2008). Polygamy: a cross-cultural analysis, Berg.p.3. ISBN 978-1-84520-220-0,
  21. ^ Dupanloup I, Pereira L, Bertorelle G, Calafell F, Prata MJ, Amorim A, Barbujani G (2003). “A recent shift from polygyny to monogamy in humans is suggested by the analysis of worldwide Y-chromosome diversity”. J Mol Evol,57 (1): 85–97. Bibcode : 2003JMolE.57.85D, CiteSeerX, doi : 10.1007/s00239-003-2458-x, PMID 12962309, S2CID 2673314,
  22. ^ Ember, Carol R. (2011). “What we know and what we don’t know about variation in social organization: Melvin Ember’s approach to the study of kinship”. Cross-Cultural Research,45 (1): 27–30. doi : 10.1177/1069397110383947, S2CID 143952998,
  23. ^ Ethnographic Atlas Codebook Archived 18 November 2012 at the Wayback Machine derived from George P. Murdock’s Ethnographic Atlas recording the marital composition of 1231 societies from 1960 to 1980
  24. ^ Jump up to: a b Zeitzen, Miriam Koktvedgaard (2008). Polygamy: A Cross-Cultural Analysis, Oxford: Berg.p.5, ISBN 978-1-84788-617-0,
  25. ^ Fox, Robin (1997). Reproduction & Succession: Studies in Anthropology, Law, and Society, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.p.48.
  26. ^ Zeitzen, Miriam Koktvedgaard (2008). Polygamy: A Cross-Cultural Analysis, Oxford: Berg. pp.125 –27.
  27. ^ Jump up to: a b Zeitzen, Miriam Koktvedgaard (2008). Polygamy: A Cross-Cultural Analysis, Oxford: Berg.p.9,
  28. ^ Fox, Robin (1997). Reproduction & Succession: Studies in Anthropology, Law and Society, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.p.21.
  29. ^ Zeitzen, Miriam Koktvedgaard (2008). Polygamy: A Cross-Cultural Analysis, Oxford: Berg. pp.17, 89–107.
  30. ^ Starkweather, Katherine; Hames, Raymond (June 2012). “A survey of non-classical polyandry”, Human Nature,23 (2): 149–72. doi : 10.1007/s12110-012-9144-x, PMID 22688804, S2CID 2008559, Archived from the original on 23 September 2017.
  31. ^ Starkweather, Katherine; Hames, Raymond (June 2012). “A survey of non-classical polyandry”, Human Nature,23 (2): 149–72. doi : 10.1007/s12110-012-9144-x, PMID 22688804, S2CID 2008559,
  32. ^ Levine, Nancy (1998). The Dynamics of polyandry: kinship, domesticity, and population on the Tibetan border, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  33. ^ Murdock, 1949, p.24. ” group marriage or a marital union embracing at once several men and several women.”
  34. ^ “Group Marriage”, Encyclopædia Britannica,
  35. ^ Child Marriage Archived 7 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine UNICEF (2011)
  36. ^ “Q & A: Child Marriage and Violations of Girls’ Rights – Human Rights Watch”,14 June 2013, Retrieved 7 October 2014,
  37. ^ Robertson, Stephen. “Age of Consent Laws”, Children and Youth in History, Archived from the original on 19 October 2015, Retrieved 28 August 2019,
  38. ^ “Understanding State Statutes on Minimum Marriage Age and Exceptions Laws” (PDF), Tahirih Justice Center, Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 December 2016, Retrieved 27 May 2017,
  39. ^ Jump up to: a b c d e “I have a right to”, BBC World Service, Retrieved 7 October 2014,
  40. ^ Jump up to: a b “Child marriages: 39,000 every day”, WHO. Archived from the original on 14 March 2013, Retrieved 7 October 2014,
  41. ^ Bullough, Vern L. “Age of Consent”, Encyclopedia, Gale Group, Retrieved 18 October 2015,
  42. ^ Jump up to: a b Hermann Heinrich Ploss, Max Bartels, Paul Bartels (1935). Woman: An Historical Gynæcological and Anthropological Compendium, London: William Heinemann (Medical Books) Ltd.p.129. ISBN 978-1-4831-9419-6, } : CS1 maint: uses authors parameter ( link )
  43. ^ A Note on Child Marriage Archived 19 August 2018 at the Wayback Machine UNICEF (July 2012), p.3
  44. ^ Matilda Coxe Stevenson, The Zuni Indians: Their Mythology, Esoteric Fraternities, and Ceremonies, (BiblioBazaar, 2010) p.37 Quote: “the most intelligent person in the pueblo. Strong character made his word law among both men and women with whom he associated. Though his wrath was dreaded by men as well as women, he was loved by all children, to whom he was ever kind.”
  45. ^ Eskridge, William N. (1993). “A History of Same-Sex Marriage”, Virginia Law Review,79 (7): 1453–58. doi : 10.2307/1073379, JSTOR 1073379,
  46. ^ Alderson, Kevin; Lahey, Kathleen A. (2004). Same-Sex Marriage: The Personal and the Political, Insomniac Press.p.16. ISBN 978-1-894663-63-2,
  47. ^ ubi scelus est id, quod non proficit scire, ubi venus mutatur in alteram formam, ubi amor quaeritur nec videtur, iubemus insurgere leges, armari iura gladio ultore, ut exquisitis poenis subdantur infames, qui sunt vel qui futuri sunt rei. Ancientrome.ru “where that crime is found, which is unfit even to know, we command the law to arise armed with an avenging sword that the infamous men who are, or shall in future be guilty of it, may undergo the most severe punishments.” translation by Lord William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1769, Vol. IV, pp.215–16.
  48. ^ Kuefler, Mathew (2007). “The Marriage Revolution in Late Antiquity: The Theodosian Code and Later Roman Marriage Law”. Journal of Family History,32 (4): 343–70. doi : 10.1177/0363199007304424, S2CID 143807895,
  49. ^ Hinsch, Bret (1990). Passions of the Cut Sleeve: The Male Homosexual Tradition in China, Reed Business Information, Inc. ISBN 978-0-520-07869-7,
  50. ^ “Gay Marriage in Montaigne”, bway.net,5 December 1998. Archived from the original on 5 December 1998, Retrieved 5 December 2017, } : CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown ( link )
  51. ^ İlkkaracan, Pınar (2008). Deconstructing sexuality in the Middle East: challenges and discourses, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.p.36. ISBN 978-0-7546-7235-7,
  52. ^ Inhorn, Marcia (2006). “Making Muslim Babies: IVF and Gamete Donation in Sunni versus Shi’a Islam”, Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry,30 (4): 427–50. doi : 10.1007/s11013-006-9027-x, PMC 1705533, PMID 17051430,
  53. ^ Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 – Sect 995.1(1) : “”spouse” of an individual includes: (a) another individual (whether of the same sex or a different sex) with whom the individual is in a relationship that is registered under a * State law or * Territory law prescribed for the purposes of section 22B of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 as a kind of relationship prescribed for the purposes of that section; and (b) another individual who, although not legally married to the individual, lives with the individual on a genuine domestic basis in a relationship as a couple.”
  54. ^ Cherlin, Andrew J. (2004). “The Deinstitutionalization of American Marriage” (PDF), Journal of Marriage and the Family,66 (4): 848–61. CiteSeerX, doi : 10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00058.x, Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 February 2017, Retrieved 25 October 2017,
  55. ^ Gargan, Edward A. (19 March 2001). “China’s New Brides Put Freedom First/All perks, no work in ‘walking marriages’ “. Newsday,p.A.04.
  56. ^ Karam, Souhail (21 July 2006). “Misyar offers marriage-lite in strict Saudi society”, The Boston Globe, Reuters. Archived from the original on 18 February 2009.
  57. ^ “A Wife Wanted”, Royal Cornwall Gazette, Falmouth Packet and Plymouth Journal,18 October 1828.p.3.
  58. ^ “World Fertility Report: 2003”, United Nations.2004, Retrieved 26 April 2006,
  59. ^ “World Marriage Patterns 2000”, United Nations.2000, Retrieved 26 April 2006,
  60. ^ DREFAHL, SVEN (7 May 2010). “How Does the Age Gap Between Partners Affect Their Survival?”, Demography,47 (2): 313–326. doi : 10.1353/dem.0.0106, PMC 3000022, PMID 20608099,
  61. ^ “Mind the gap – does age difference in relationships matter?”, phys.org,
  62. ^ Harmanci, Reyhan (15 April 2020). “The Truth About Pregnancy Over 40”, The New York Times, Archived from the original on 15 April 2020.
  63. ^ “Having a Baby at 40: Benefits, Risks, and What to Expect”, Healthline,4 March 2019.
  64. ^ Stephen K. Sanderson (2010), “Why Rational Choice Theory and Sociobiology Are Natural Allies” (PDF), Evolution, Biology and Society, 7 (1), archived from the original (PDF) on 18 April 2015, retrieved 18 April 2015
  65. ^ Lancaster, J.B.; Altmann, J.; Sherrod, L.R.; Rossi, A. (2010). Parenting Across the Life Span: Biosocial Dimensions, Aldine Transaction. ISBN 978-1-4128-4452-9,
  66. ^ Hopcroft, Rosemary L. (April 2021). “High income men have high value as long-term mates in the U.S. (abstract)”, Evolution and Human Behavior,42 (3). doi : 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2021.03.004, S2CID 233667442, Retrieved 26 March 2021,
  67. ^ Strong, Anise (2006). “Incest Laws and Absent Taboos in Roman Egypt”, Ancient History Bulletin,20,
  68. ^ Lewis, N. (1983). Life in Egypt under Roman Rule, Clarendon Press, ISBN 978-0-19-814848-7,
  69. ^ Frier, Bruce W.; Bagnall, Roger S. (1994). The Demography of Roman Egypt, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-46123-8,
  70. ^ Shaw, B.D. (1992). “Explaining Incest: Brother-Sister Marriage in Graeco-Roman Egypt”. Man, New Series.27 (2): 267–99. doi : 10.2307/2804054, JSTOR 2804054,
  71. ^ Hopkins, Keith (1980). “Brother-Sister Marriage in Roman Egypt”. Comparative Studies in Society and History,22 (3): 303–54. doi : 10.1017/S0010417500009385, S2CID 143698328,
  72. ^ remijsen, sofie. “Incest or Adoption? Brother-Sister Marriage in Roman Egypt Revisited” (PDF),
  73. ^ Scheidel, W. (1997). “Brother-sister marriage in Roman Egypt” (PDF), Journal of Biosocial Science,29 (3): 361–71. doi : 10.1017/s0021932097003611, PMID 9881142, S2CID 23732024, Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 November 2013, Retrieved 4 July 2013,
  74. ^ Conniff, Richard (1 August 2003). “Richard Conniff. “Go Ahead, Kiss Your Cousin.” “, Discovermagazine.com.
  75. ^ Kershaw, Sarah (26 November 2009). “Shaking Off the Shame”, The New York Times,
  76. ^ See Article 809 of the Korean Civil Code and “The first ten years of the Korean Constitutional Court” (PDF), Constitutional Court of Korea.p.242 (p.256 of the PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 February 2012.
  77. ^ Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976 Archived 7 March 2012 at the Wayback Machine (for Hindus only)
  78. ^ (in Russian) The Family Code of the Russian Federation, Article 14 (in Russian), Semkodeks.ru (13 May 2009). Retrieved on 5 September 2013.
  79. ^ Ottenheimer, Martin (1996). “Chapter 3”, Forbidden Relatives: The American Myth of Cousin Marriage, University of Illinois.
  80. ^ “Islamic View on Marrying Cousins”, IslamonLine.net. Archived from the original on 16 July 2007, Retrieved 4 June 2017,
  81. ^ Bourdieu, Pierre (1972). Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp.27–29.
  82. ^ Radcliffe-Brown, A.R., Daryll Forde (1950). African Systems of Kinship and Marriage, London: KPI Limited.
  83. ^ Lévi-Strauss, Claude (1963). Structural Anthropology, New York: Basic Books. ISBN 9780465082308,
  84. ^ “Orange County Register”, Orange County Register,4 July 2021, Retrieved 4 July 2021,
  85. ^ Ethics – Slavery: Modern slavery, BBC. Retrieved on 5 September 2013.
  86. ^ Report of the Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of slavery, including its causes and consequences, Gulnara Shahinian, United Nations. Human Rights Council Twenty-first session.10 July 2012
  87. ^ “Child Marriage Factsheet: State of World Population 2005”, UNFPA. Archived from the original on 16 August 2007.
  88. ^ Goody, Jack (1976). Production and Reproduction: A Comparative Study of the Domestic Domain, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.p.6.
  89. ^ ” India’s dowry deaths “. BBC News.16 July 2003.
  90. ^ Anita Pratap (11 September 1995) Women: killed by greed and oppression “. Time Magazine. Volume 146, No.11
  91. ^ “Nepal bans dowry, caste-based discrimination – OneWorld South Asia”, Southasia.oneworld.net.27 January 2009. Archived from the original on 20 July 2012, Retrieved 26 September 2012,
  92. ^ Tanwar, Reicha (2007). Dowery the North Indian Perspective, Pinnacle Technology. pp.36–. ISBN 978-1-61820-208-6,
  93. ^ Goody, Jack (1976). Production and Reproduction: A Comparative Study of the Domestic Domain, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.p.8.
  94. ^ Exodus 22:15–16
  95. ^ “A translation of some parts of the Civil Code of Iran”, International-divorce.com.
  96. ^ “What are marriage penalties and bonuses?”, Tax Policy Center, Retrieved 28 June 2021,
  97. ^ Renacci, James B. “Simplifying America’s Tax System.” Simplifying America’s Tax System (2016): 1–11. Renacci.house.gov, July 2016. Web.26 Feb.2017.
  98. ^ Rosenblatt, Paul C. (2006). Two in a Bed: The Social System of Couple Bed Sharing, State University of New York Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-6829-6, Archived from the original on 3 July 2009, Retrieved 13 January 2007,
  99. ^ Sanday, Peggy Reeves (2002). Women at the center: life in a modern matriarchy, Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-0-8014-8906-8,
  100. ^ For example, Lewis Henry Morgan, Edward Tylor, or George Peter Murdock
  101. ^ as has been shown by Korotayev
  102. ^ Korotayev, A. (2003). “Form of marriage, sexual division of labor, and postmarital residence in cross-cultural perspective: A reconsideration”, Journal of Anthropological Research,59 (1): 69–89. doi : 10.1086/jar.59.1.3631445, JSTOR 3631445, S2CID 147513567,
  103. ^ Korotayev, A. (2003). “Division of Labor by Gender and Postmarital Residence in Cross-Cultural Perspective: A Reconsideration”, Cross-Cultural Research,37 (4): 335–72. doi : 10.1177/1069397103253685, S2CID 145694651,
  104. ^ Ember, Melvin; Ember, Carol R. (1983). Marriage, Family, and Kinship: Comparative Studies of Social Organization, New Haven: HRAF Press. ISBN 978-0-87536-113-0,
  105. ^ “The Universal Declaration of Human Rights”, United Nations, Retrieved 26 December 2013,
  106. ^ Leach, Edmund (1968). Paul Bonannan and John Middleton (ed.). Marriage, Family, and Residence, The Natural History Press. ISBN 978-1-121-64470-0,
  107. ^ Krier, James E.; Gregory S. Alexander; Michael H. Schill; Jesse Dukeminier (2006). Property, Aspen Publishers. ISBN 978-0-7355-5792-5, Excerpt – p.335: “.at the wedding; hence the importance of including in the marriage ceremony the words, ‘With all my worldly goods I thee endow.'”
  108. ^ Gallagher, Maggie (2002). “What is Marriage For? The Public Purposes of Marriage Law” (PDF), Louisiana law review.
  109. ^ “Adultery” Encyclopædia Britannica
  110. ^ Q & A: Child Marriage and Violations of Girls’ Rights | Human Rights Watch, Hrw.org (14 June 2013). Retrieved on 5 September 2013.
  111. ^ WHO | Child marriages: 39,000 every day, Who.int (7 March 2013). Retrieved on 6 April 2013.
  112. ^ “State Variations on American Marriage Prohibitions”, www.umanitoba.ca, Retrieved 10 July 2021,
  113. ^ Hafen, Bruce C. (1983). “The Constitutional Status of Marriage, Kinship, and Sexual Privacy: Balancing the Individual and Social Interests”, Michigan Law Review,81 (3): 463–574. doi : 10.2307/1288509, ISSN 0026-2234, JSTOR 1288509,
  114. ^ Campagno, Marcelo (18 August 2014). “Patronage and Other Logics of Social Organization in Ancient Egypt during the IIIrd Millennium bce”, Journal of Egyptian History,7 (1): 1–33. doi : 10.1163/18741665-12340012, ISSN 1874-1657,
  115. ^ Frank W Sweet (1 January 2005). “The Invention of the Color Line: 1691—Essays on the Color Line and the One-Drop Rule”, Backentyme Essays. Archived from the original on 9 April 2007.
  116. ^ Karthikeyan, Hrishi; Chin, Gabriel (2002). “Preserving Racial Identity: Population Patterns and the Application of Anti-Miscegenation Statutes to Asian Americans, 1910–1950”. Asian Law Journal,9 (1). SSRN 283998,
  117. ^ “Where were Interracial Couples Illegal?”, LovingDay, Archived from the original on 31 December 2007, Retrieved 5 August 2013,
  118. ^ “Courtroom History” Archived 31 December 2007 at the Wayback Machine Lovingday.org Retrieved 28 June 2007
  119. ^ Stein, Edward (2004). “Past and present proposed amendments to the United States constitution regarding marriage”. Washington University Law Quarterly,82 (3). SSRN 576181,
  120. ^ Michael Burleigh (7 November 1991). The Racial State: Germany 1933–1945, Cambridge University Press.p.49, ISBN 978-0-521-39802-2,
  121. ^ “Inter-American Court endorses same-sex marriage”, Agence France-Presse, Yahoo7,9 January 2018. Archived from the original on 9 January 2018, Retrieved 9 January 2018,
  122. ^ “Inter-American Human Rights Court backs same-sex marriage”, BBC,10 January 2018, Retrieved 6 April 2018, “Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. _ (2015)”, Justia,26 June 2015, Retrieved 6 April 2018, Smith, Susan K. (30 July 2009). “Marriage a Civil Right, not Sacred Rite”, The Washington Post, Archived from the original on 3 October 2012, Retrieved 20 September 2012, “Decision in Perry v. Schwarzenegger” (PDF), Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 March 2013, Retrieved 6 August 2010,
  123. ^ “Two in Three Americans Support Same-Sex Marriage”, Gallup,23 May 2018. “For several years a majority of Australians have supported marriage equality”, Australian Marriage Equality Incorporated, Retrieved 22 May 2015, “Support for Same‐Sex Marriage in Latin America” (PDF), Vanderbilt University, Retrieved 25 September 2012,
  124. ^ “Polygamy in Muslim countries”, Waleg.com.26 June 2005. Archived from the original on 1 September 2013, Retrieved 4 August 2013,
  125. ^ Berstein, Nina (25 March 2007). “Polygamy, Practiced in Secrecy, Follows Africans to New York City”, The New York Times, Archived from the original on 20 July 2008.
  126. ^ “Tunisia: Notable Features: Polygamy”, Law.emory.edu.
  127. ^ Jump up to: a b Hagerty, Barbara Bradley (27 May 2008). “Some Muslims in U.S. Quietly Engage in Polygamy”, National Public Radio : All Things Considered,
  128. ^ Lyman, Edward Leo (1994). “Statehood for Utah”. In Powell, Allan Kent (ed.). Utah History Encyclopedia, Salt Lake City, Utah: University of Utah Press, ISBN 978-0-87480-425-6, OCLC 30473917, Archived from the original on 1 November 2013.
  129. ^ “Sri Lanka: Family Code”, Genderindex.org. Archived from the original on 27 October 2010.
  130. ^ See Polygamy in India
  131. ^ “Turkish Civil and Penal Code Reforms from a Gender Perspective: The Success of two Nationwide Campaigns” (PDF), Archived from the original (PDF) on 31 December 2006. (6.21 MB) (p.18)
  132. ^ Jump up to: a b “Common Law Marriage FAQ.” Nolo.31 July 2009.
  133. ^ NYC Protest and Civil Rights March Opposing Proposition 8, Andy Towle, Towleroad.com, 13 November 2008. Retrieved 14 November 2008.
  134. ^ “Immigration to the United States: Fiscal years 1820–2003” (PDF), (2.03 MB)
  135. ^ “Sham marriage: Married on the day they met to prolong her stay”, Retrieved 26 June 2014,
  136. ^ “Are married women required by law to obey their husbands?”, Our World in Data, Retrieved 15 February 2020,
  137. ^ Jump up to: a b Weadock, Briana. “Disciplining Marriage: Gender, Power and Resistance” Archived 25 April 2012 at the Wayback Machine, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Hilton San Francisco & Renaissance Parc 55 Hotel, San Francisco, CA, 14 August 2004.
  138. ^ Evans, Tanya (2005) Women, Marriage and the Family, p.64 in Barker, Hannah, & Elaine Chalus, eds., Women’s History: Britain, 1700–1850: An Introduction, Oxon/London: Routledge, ISBN 0-415-29177-1,
  139. ^ Evans, Tanya, Women, Marriage and the Family, op. cit., in Barker, Hannah, & Elaine Chalus, eds., Women’s History, op. cit., p.66 & n.69.
  140. ^ Wollstonecraft, Mary (1995). Wollstonecraft: A Vindication of the Rights of Man and a Vindication of the Rights of Woman and Hints, Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-43633-5,
  141. ^ The Traffic in Women by Emma Goldman 1910, Marxists.org. Retrieved on 5 September 2013.
  142. ^ Russell, Bertrand (1929). Marriage And Morals,
  143. ^ Carter, Angela (1984). Nights at the circus, Chatto & Windus. ISBN 9780701139322,
  144. ^ Hardisty, Jean (2008) Marriage as a cure for poverty?, Red Sun Press, ISBN 0-915987-21-X,
  145. ^ Reduce Poverty Using Proven Methods: Eliminate Federal Funding of “Marriage Promotion” and Staff HHS with Appointees Who Value All Families, arts.cornell.edu
  146. ^ Veronica Jaris Tichenor, “Thinking About Gender and Power in Marriage”, The Kaleidoscope of Gender, 2010
  147. ^ bell hooks (2000). Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center, Pluto Press. ISBN 978-0-7453-1663-5,
  148. ^ Barnett, Hilaire A, Introduction to Feminist Jurisprudence (London: Cavendish Publishing, 1998 ( ISBN 1-85941-237-8 )), p.35 and, per p.35 n.35, see chap.3 (author then of Queen Mary & Westfield Coll., Univ. of London).
  149. ^ Jump up to: a b Sprecher, Susan; Felmlee, Diane (1997). “The Balance of Power in Romantic Heterosexual Couples Over Time from “His” and “Her” Perspectives”, Sex Roles,37 (5/6): 361–79. doi : 10.1023/A:1025601423031, S2CID 141083115, Archived from the original on 30 April 2011.
  150. ^ Figure 9, Frances Finnegan, Do Penance or Perish, Congrave Press, 2001.
  151. ^ Divale, W. (2000). Pre-Coded Variables for the Standard Cross-Cultural Sample, Volume I and II (PDF), Jamaica, New York: York College, CUNY. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 December 2008. See Variable 170 and Variable 171
  152. ^ Murdock, G.P.; White, D.R. (1969). “Standard cross-cultural sample”. Ethnology,8 (4): 329–69. doi : 10.2307/3772907, JSTOR 3772907,
  153. ^ Clements, M. (7 August 1994). “Sex in America today: A new national survey reveals how our attitudes are changing”. Parade Magazine. pp.4–6.
  154. ^ Laumann, E.O.; Gagnon, J.H.; Michael, R.T.; Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  155. ^ Wiederman, M.W. (1997). “Extramarital sex: Prevalence and correlates in a national survey”. Journal of Sex Research,34 (2): 167–74. doi : 10.1080/00224499709551881,
  156. ^ Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance (31 December 2006). “Human sexuality and gender topics: Subjects of major concern to many faith groups”, Religioustolerance.org.
  157. ^ “Human Rights Voices – Pakistan, August 21, 2008”, Eyeontheun.org. Archived from the original on 21 January 2013.
  158. ^ “Home”, AIDSPortal. Archived from the original on 26 October 2008.
  159. ^ Jump up to: a b “Iran”, Travel.state.gov. Archived from the original on 1 August 2013.
  160. ^ “United Nations Human Rights Website – Treaty Bodies Database – Document – Summary Record – Kuwait”, Unhchr.ch.
  161. ^ “Culture of Maldives – history, people, clothing, women, beliefs, food, customs, family, social”, Everyculture.com.
  162. ^ Fakim, Nora (9 August 2012). “BBC News – Morocco: Should pre-marital sex be legal?”, BBC.
  163. ^ “Legislation of Interpol member states on sexual offences against children – Oman” (PDF), Interpol. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 May 2016.
  164. ^ “2010 Human Rights Report: Mauritania”, State.gov.8 April 2011.
  165. ^ Dubai FAQs. “Education in Dubai”, Dubaifaqs.com.
  166. ^ Judd, Terri (10 July 2008). “Briton faces jail for sex on Dubai beach – Middle East – World”, The Independent, London.
  167. ^ “Sudan must rewrite rape laws to protect victims”, Reuters,28 June 2007. Archived from the original on 9 December 2012.
  168. ^ United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. “Refworld | Women’s Rights in the Middle East and North Africa – Yemen”, UNHCR.
  169. ^ Ethics – Honour crimes, BBC. Retrieved on 5 September 2013.
  170. ^ Pandey, Geeta. (16 June 2010) BBC News – Indian community torn apart by ‘honour killings’, Bbc.co.uk. Retrieved on 5 September 2013.
  171. ^ Iran Stoning: Woman To Be Executed For Adultery, Huffingtonpost.com. Retrieved on 5 September 2013.
  172. ^ “Somali woman stoned for adultery”, BBC News,18 November 2009.
  173. ^ Tait, Robert & Hoseiny, Noushin (21 July 2008). “Eight women and a man face stoning in Iran for adultery”, The Guardian, London.
  174. ^ “Two Men Stoned to Death for Adultery in Iran” Archived 27 May 2013 at the Wayback Machine, Foxnews.com (13 January 2009). Retrieved on 5 September 2013.
  175. ^ “Taliban ‘kill adulterous Afghan couple’ “, BBC News,16 August 2010.
  176. ^ Woman stoned to death in north Afghanistan « RAWA News, Rawa.org. Retrieved on 5 September 2013.
  177. ^ Smith, David (31 May 2012). “Sudanese woman sentenced to stoning death over adultery claims”, The Guardian, London.
  178. ^ Islamists: Two stoned to death for committing adultery in Mali, CNN.2 August 2012.
  179. ^ Pakistani couple face death by stoning threat after conviction for adultery | World news, The Guardian.18 July 2010.
  180. ^ Hussain, Zahid (5 September 2008). “Three teenagers buried alive in ‘honour killings’ “, Times Online, London.
  181. ^ “Pakistani women buried alive ‘for choosing husbands’ “, Telegraph, London.1 September 2008. Archived from the original on 10 January 2022.
  182. ^ Freedman, Estelle B. (25 August 2013). “Feminism’s amazing achievement: Changing the conversation – and laws – about rape”, Salon, Retrieved 11 October 2022,
  183. ^ “Morocco protest after raped Amina Filali kills herself”, BBC News,15 March 2012.
  184. ^ Domestic violence is today illegal in the Western World, but this is not the case in many developing countries, In Jordan, for instance, part of article 340 of the Penal Code states that ” he who discovers his wife or one of his female relatives committing adultery and kills, wounds, or injures one of them, is exempted from any penalty, Altstein, Howard & Simon, Rita James (2003). Global perspectives on social issues: marriage and divorce, Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books,p.11. ISBN 978-0-7391-0588-7,
  185. ^ IPS – Adultery Laws Unfairly Target Women, U.N. Says | Inter Press Service, Ipsnews.net (24 October 2012). Retrieved on 5 September 2013.
  186. ^ Jump up to: a b DisplayNews, Ohchr.org (18 October 2012). Retrieved on 5 September 2013.
  187. ^ Indonesia: New Aceh Law Imposes Torture | Human Rights Watch, Hrw.org (11 October 2009). Retrieved on 5 September 2013.
  188. ^ Court in UAE says beating wife, child OK if no marks are left – CNN.com Archived 25 March 2012 at the Wayback Machine, Articles.cnn.com. Retrieved on 6 April 2013.
  189. ^ Key human rights concerns highlighted by Amnesty International in advance of Swaziland’s Universal Periodic Review hearing in October 2011, Amnesty International
  190. ^ Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, Twenty-eighth session, United Nations, 14 February 2003.
  191. ^ Women in France Archived 4 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Modern and Contemporary France, Taylor and Francis.
  192. ^ France’s leading women show the way Archived 28 July 2013 at the Wayback Machine, Parisvoice.com. Retrieved on 6 April 2013.
  193. ^ Lesson – The French Civil Code (Napoleonic Code) – Teaching Women’s Rights From Past to Present, Womeninworldhistory.com. Retrieved on 6 April 2013.
  194. ^ Bennhold, Katrin (5 October 2010).20 Years After Fall of Wall, Women of Former East Germany Thrive, The New York Times,
  195. ^ Trzcinski, Eileen and Holst, Elke (April 2010) Gender Differences in Subjective Well-Being in and out of Management Positions, German Institute for Economic Research, Berlin.
  196. ^ Spain – Social Values And Attitudes, Countrystudies.us. Retrieved on 6 April 2013.
  197. ^ Statistics by Area – Attitudes towards wife-beating – Statistical table Archived 4 July 2014 at the Wayback Machine, Childinfo.org. Retrieved on 6 April 2013.
  198. ^ “UNICEF Data” (PDF), Retrieved 8 February 2013,
  199. ^ “Decriminalization of adultery and defenses”, www.endvawnow.org,
  200. ^ Collins, Jem (25 July 2018). “It’s 2018 And You Still Don’t Have A Right To Divorce”, EachOther, Retrieved 31 July 2022,
  201. ^ Lichauco de Leon, Sunshine (6 October 2014). “The fight to make divorce legal in the Philippines”, CNN, Retrieved 11 August 2021,
  202. ^ Bartlett, Katherine T. (1999). “Feminism and Family Law”, Family Law Quarterly,33 (3): 475–500.
  203. ^ “The Economics of Dowry and Brideprice” (PDF), econ.arts.ubc.ca, Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 March 2016, Retrieved 30 October 2012,
  204. ^ “Human rights groups ask NWFP Govt. to ban ‘bride price’ to curb women Trafficking”, Thefreelibrary.com.18 January 2010.
  205. ^ iSite Interactive Limited (21 November 2011). “PNG Police blame bride price for violence in marriage”, Islands Business. Archived from the original on 26 January 2013.
  206. ^ “Addressing dowry-related violence through criminalization of dowry demands”, Endvawnow.org.
  207. ^ “Changing Patterns of Nonmarital Childbearing in the United States”, CDC/National Center for Health Statistics,13 May 2009, Retrieved 24 September 2011,
  208. ^ The 1997 Global Study on Family Values found that only 3% of respondents in Iceland, 8% in France, and 9% in Germany, thought that it was “wrong” to have a child outside marriage. Global Study of Family Values. An International Gallup Poll. Family Values Differ Sharply Around the World, hi-ho.ne.jp
  209. ^ In many parts of the world, especially in Muslim majority countries, children born outside marriage and their mothers face severe social and legal difficulties Refugee Review Tribunal Australia, mrt-rrt.gov.au.21 April 2009.
  210. ^ European Convention on the Legal Status of Children Born out of Wedlock, Conventions.coe.int. Retrieved on 5 September 2013.
  211. ^ Council of Europe – ETS no.085 – European Convention on the Legal Status of Children Born out of Wedlock, Conventions.coe.int. Retrieved on 5 September 2013.
  212. ^ Family Law Act 1975 – SECT 69Q Presumption of paternity arising from cohabitation, Austlii.edu.au. Retrieved on 5 September 2013.
  213. ^ ECHR : Anayo v. Germany Publication : Archived 26 February 2014 at the Wayback Machine, Sim.law.uu.nl. Retrieved on 5 September 2013.
  214. ^ Parental rights and responsibilities, GOV.UK (1 July 2013). Retrieved on 5 September 2013.
  215. ^ Legal guardianship and cohabiting couples, Citizensinformation.ie (8 March 2013). Retrieved on 5 September 2013.
  216. ^ “Global Children’s Trends | The Sustainable Demographic Dividend”, Sustaindemographicdividend.org.
  217. ^ Joice Melo Vieira. The Evolution of Births Outside of Marriage, Paternal Recognition and Children’s Rights in Brazil, Department of Demography (IFCH) and Population Studies Center (Nepo), State University of Campinas
  218. ^ Jump up to: a b “Eurostat – Tables, Graphs and Maps Interface (TGM) table”, ec.europa.eu,
  219. ^ “FastStats”, www.cdc.gov,8 August 2018.
  220. ^ AGD. “National Apology for Forced Adoptions”, www.ag.gov.au, Retrieved 1 July 2019,
  221. ^ “Gillard sorry for forced adoptions”, BBC News,
  222. ^ Bawah, AA.; Akweongo P; Simmons R; Phillips JF. (1999). “Women’s fears and men’s anxieties: the impact of family planning on gender relations in northern Ghana” (PDF), Studies in Family Planning,30 (1): 54–66. doi : 10.1111/j.1728-4465.1999.00054.x, hdl : 2027.42/73927, PMID 10216896,
  223. ^ Olson, Duane (2011). Issues in Contemporary Christian Thought: A Fortress Introduction, Fortress Press,p.150. ISBN 978-1-4514-0731-0, Retrieved 17 September 2015, In the course of human history, over thousands of years, many human cultures arise in relative isolation from each other, and major world religions develop in these relatively independent cultures.
  224. ^ Zarean, Mansoureh; Barzegar, Khadijeh (2016). “Marriage in Islam, Christianity, and Judaism”, Religious Inquiries,5 (9): 67–80, Retrieved 30 May 2020,
  225. ^ Smith, Peter (2000). “Marriage”, A concise encyclopedia of the Baháʼí Faith, Oxford: Oneworld Publications. pp.232–33, ISBN 978-1-85168-184-6,
  226. ^ Genesis 2:22–24
  227. ^ Matthew 19:6
  228. ^ Jump up to: a b c d Witte, John Jr. (1997). From Sacrament to Contract: Marriage, Religion, and Law in the Western Tradition, Westminster John Knox Press. pp.39–40, ISBN 978-0-664-25543-5,
  229. ^ “Religions – Christianity: Marriage and weddings”, BBC.
  230. ^ Jump up to: a b Monger, George P. (2004). “Christian Weddings”, Marriage Customs of the World: From Henna to Honeymoons, Santa Barbara, CA: ABC CLIO. pp.70–71, ISBN 978-1-57607-987-4, OCLC 469368346,
  231. ^ Jump up to: a b c * O’Malley, John W. (15 January 2013). Trent: What Happened at the Council, Harvard University Press.p.225, ISBN 978-0-674-06760-8,
    • O’Malley, John (22 May 2013). The Council of Trent. Myths, Misunderstandings and Unintended Consequences, Gregorian Biblical BookShop.p.6. ISBN 978-88-7839-255-7,
  232. ^ For clarification, see State of Virginity: Gender, Religion, and Politics in an Early Modern Europe (Google Books) by Ulrike Strasser, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 2007
  233. ^ “Catholic Encyclopedia: Ritual of Marriage”, www.newadvent.org,
  234. ^ Gen.2:24
  235. ^ See also, Gen.2:24, Matt.19:5, Eph.5:31
  236. ^ Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). “Sacrament of Marriage”, Catholic Encyclopedia, New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  237. ^ Jump up to: a b Yrigoyen, Charles Jr.; Warrick, Susan E. (7 November 2013). Historical Dictionary of Methodism, Scarecrow Press.p.236. ISBN 978-0-8108-7894-5, In Methodism, the sacred service celebrates a covenenat grounded in the will of God and sustained by divine grace. Methodism encourages the solemnization of marriages within the context of congregational worship and eucharistic celebration.
  238. ^ Eph.5:29–32
  239. ^ “Catechism of the Catholic Church, Second Edition, Article Seven, Paragraph 1612”, Vatican.va. Archived from the original on 17 February 2007.
  240. ^ “Catechism of the Catholic Church, Second Edition, Article Seven, Paragraph 1601”, Vatican.va. Archived from the original on 17 February 2007.
  241. ^ The Book of Resolutions of The United Methodist Church 2016, United Methodist Publishing House.16 December 2016.p.623. ISBN 978-1-5018-3325-0, For the church, the marriage covenant is grounded in the covenant between God and God’s people into which Christians enter in their baptism.
  242. ^ McLachlan, P. Sacrament of Holy Matrimony, Catholic-pages.com
  243. ^ “Catechism of the Catholic Church, Second Edition, Article Seven, Paragraph 1665”, Vatican.va. Archived from the original on 17 February 2007.
  244. ^ “Statements of General Synod”, Reformed Church in America,1975, Retrieved 4 June 2021,
  245. ^ Evangelical Methodist Church Discipline, Evangelical Methodist Church Conference,15 July 2017. pp.22–21. The marriage contract is so sacred that we advise against seeking divorce on any grounds whatseover. Should any member seek divorce on any unscriptural grounds (Matt.5:32 “But I say unto you, that whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery; and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced comitteth adultery.”), and that well proven, he shall be summoned to appear at a meeting in the local church, with the general board working in co-operation with the local church board. If proven guilty of such offense, he shall be dismissed at once, and no longer considered a member of Evangelical Methodist Church. We advise against the remarriage of all divorced persons, as the scriptures declare in Romans 7:3a “.So then if, while her husband liveth, she be married to another man, she shall be called an adulteress.” If any person becoming converted, and having such marital complications as mentioned above in the days of their sin and ignorance, it is our belief that God will and does forgive them; however, we shall not receive such persons into church membership, but with to extend to them the right hand of fellowship, promising the prayers of God’s people. Should any pastor, knowingly or unknowingly, receive such persons that have been divorced and remarried into membership, such membership shall not be valid. Ministers are advised to have nothing to do with the re-marriage of persons divorced on any grounds. In the event any person is divorced by an unbelieving companion and shall remain in an unmarried state, retaining his or her Christian integrity, he or she shall not be dismissed or barred from church membership.
  246. ^ Divorce and Remarriage from Augustine to Zwingli, Christianity Today. Retrieved on 6 April 2013.
  247. ^ Matthew, 19: 6, New American Bible Revised Edition,,
  248. ^ Code of Canon Law Annotated, edited by Ernest Caparros et alia, Canon 1056, pp.806–07 (Woodridge, Illinois: Midwest Theological Forum, 2004); see the printed work to correctly cite the translator(s) et alia; emphasis added.
  249. ^ Code of Canon Law Annotated, edited by Ernest Caparros et alia, Canon 1057, §2, p.807 (Woodridge, Illinois: Midwest Theological Forum, 2004); see the printed work to correctly cite the translator(s) et alia; emphasis added.
  250. ^ “GCSE Bitesize: Marriage”, BBC.
  251. ^ Ephesians 5:31–33
  252. ^ Mulhall, Daniel S. (18 September 2013). The Ecumenical Christian Dialogues and The Catechism of the Catholic Church, Paulist Press.p.155. ISBN 978-1-61643-809-8, The Protestant reformers of the sixteenth century were unwilling to call marriage a sacrament because they did not regard matrimony as a necessary means of grace for salvation. Though not necessary for salvation certainly marriage is a means of grace, thus, sacramental in character.
  253. ^ Witte, John (2007). From Sacarament to Contract: Marriage, Religion, and Law in the Western Tradition, The Family, Religion, and Culture (1st ed.). Westminster John Knox Press.
  254. ^ Book of Discipline of the Free Methodist Church, Free Methodist Church,2015. pp.53–54.
  255. ^ “The Family: A Proclamation to the World”, ChurchofJesusChrist.org,
  256. ^ “Lesson 5: Laws and Ordinances”, ChurchofJesusChrist.org,
  257. ^ “Lesson 15: Eternal Marriage”, ChurchofJesusChrist.org,
  258. ^ Jump up to: a b c d Dooley, Sandra (20 June 2016). A Guide to Catholic Weddings, Liturgy Training Publications. pp.29–30. ISBN 978-1-61833-134-2,
  259. ^ “World Religions and Same-Sex Marriage”, Marriage Law Project, Columbus School of Law at The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC, July 2002 revision
  260. ^ “Affirming Congregations, The Episcopal Church and Ministries of the United Church of Canada”, United-church.ca. Archived from the original on 31 May 2010.
  261. ^ “Religious Groups’ Official Positions on Same-Sex Marriage”, pewforums.org.1 April 2008. Archived from the original on 9 November 2008.
  262. ^ Shaila Dewan (5 July 2005). “United Church of Christ Backs Same-Sex Marriage”, The New York Times, Archived from the original on 8 July 2005.
  263. ^ Levy, Reuben (2000). The Social Structure of Islam, Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-415-20910-6,
  264. ^ “Global Connections, How Many Wives? | PBS”, www.pbs.org, Retrieved 31 July 2022,
  265. ^ The Encyclopaedia of Islam, New Edition, Vol. VIII, p.27, Leiden 1995.
  266. ^ “The method of pronouncing the marriage formula”,
  267. ^ Marriage formula, sistani.org
  268. ^ Conditions of pronouncing Nikah, sistani.org
  269. ^ “Women with whom matrimony is Haraam”,
  270. ^ “The Four Pillars Of Mut’a”, Al-Islam.org,27 September 2012.
  271. ^ Mishnah Kidushin 1:1
  272. ^ “The Babylonian Talmud, Kiddushin”, juchre.org, JCR.
  273. ^ Gen.1:28
  274. ^ “Why Marry?”, Chabad.org, Archived from the original on 24 December 2007.
  275. ^ Gen 24:49–67
  276. ^ Gen 29:27
  277. ^ Judges 14:7–12
  278. ^ Jump up to: a b c d One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain : Singer, Isidore ; et al., eds. (1901–1906). “Marriage”, The Jewish Encyclopedia, New York: Funk & Wagnalls.
  279. ^ Pitts, Chuck (31 October 2015). “Judges 19 as a Paradigm for Understanding and Responding to Human Trafficking”, Priscilla Papers: The Academic Journal of Christians for Biblical Equality, Retrieved 28 December 2020, Their solution to the loss of Benjamin’s men was to conquer the town of Jabesh-Gilead—killing everyone except four hundred young virgins—and taking their virgins to repopulate Benjamin. Unfortunately, there were not enough virgins in Jabesh-Gilead for all the men of Benjamin, so virgins participating in a ritual celebration at Shiloh were kidnapped and given to the men of Benjamin.
  280. ^ Sumner, William Graham (2007), “X. The Marriage Institution”, Folkways: A Study of Mores, Manners, Customs and Morals, New York: Cosimo, Inc.p.398. ISBN 978-1-60206-758-5, OCLC 254079323, The whole proceeding was a domestic and family affair, in which no priest or other outsider had any part, except as witness, and there was no religious element in it.1 Bergel, Eheverhält. der Juden, 19.
  281. ^ Jump up to: a b c d This article incorporates text from the 1903 Encyclopaedia Biblica article “MARRIAGE”, a publication now in the public domain,
  282. ^ Genesis 29:9 ; Exodus 2:16 ;, 8:13
  283. ^ Ex 21:10
  284. ^ Deut 24:2–4
  285. ^ “What is The Hindu Widows’ Remarriage Act, 1856?”, Jagranjosh.com,20 July 2020, Retrieved 18 May 2021,
  286. ^ Jump up to: a b Bedard, Karlie (2012). All about Wicca (PDF), Delhi: University Publications. pp.17–18. ISBN 978-1-283-50016-6,
  287. ^ A Wiccan Bible: Exploring the Mysteries of the Craft from Birth to Summerland – p.124, A.J. Drew – 2003
  288. ^ David C. Ribar (2004). “What Do Social Scientists Know About the Benefits of Marriage? A Review of Quantitative Methodologies”, IZA: vi-viii, 7–8. Archived from the original on 26 October 2019, Retrieved 4 August 2019,
  289. ^ Jump up to: a b c “PsycNET”, psycnet.apa.org, Retrieved 17 July 2019,
  290. ^ Jump up to: a b c d Kiecolt-Glaser, JK; Newton, TL (2001). “Marriage and health: His and hers”. Psychological Bulletin,127 (4): 472–503. doi : 10.1037/0033-2909.127.4.472, PMID 11439708,
  291. ^ Thoits, P.A. (2011). “Mechanisms Linking Social Ties and Support to Physical and Mental Health”, Journal of Health and Social Behavior,52 (2): 145–61. doi : 10.1177/0022146510395592, PMID 21673143, S2CID 18169869,
  292. ^ Jump up to: a b Wanic, R.; Kulik, J. (2011). “Toward an understanding of gender differences in the impact of marital conflict on health”. Sex Roles,65 (5–6): 297–312. doi : 10.1007/s11199-011-9968-6, S2CID 145011583,
  293. ^ Saxbe, DE; Repetti, RL; Nishina, A (2008). “Marital satisfaction, recovery from work, and diurnal cortisol among men and women” (PDF), Health Psychology,27 (1): 15–25. CiteSeerX, doi : 10.1037/0278-6133.27.1.15, PMID 18230009,
  294. ^ Malig, Jojo (6 July 2012). “Is Philippines ready for a divorce law?”, ABS-CBN News. Archived from the original on 7 June 2012.
  295. ^ “No-Fault Divorce – The Pros and Cons Of No-Fault Divorce”, Divorcesupport.about.com.30 July 2010. Archived from the original on 30 June 2017, Retrieved 19 February 2010,
  296. ^ Nearly half of marriaged doomed for divorce, The Guardian (27 March 2008)
  297. ^ Yen, Hope (18 May 2011) Census; divorce decline but 7 year itch persists, Associated Press.
  298. ^ for the historiography see Frederik J.G. Pedersen, “Marriage” in Kelly Boyd, ed. (1999). Encyclopedia of Historians and Historical Writing vol 2, Taylor & Francis. pp.766–68. ISBN 978-1-884964-33-6,
  299. ^ Hobhouse, Leonard Trelawny (1906) Morals in evolution: a study in comparative ethics, New York: H. Holt and Co, p.180.
  300. ^ “The origins of marriage”, The Week,1 January 2007, Retrieved 8 December 2019,
  301. ^ Naranjo, Robert. “Marriage in Ancient Mesopotamia and Babylonia”, eHistory.osu.edu, Ohio State University, Retrieved 8 December 2019,
  302. ^ Jump up to: a b William Robertson Smith, Kinship and Marriage in early Arabia, (1885), 167
  303. ^ Judges 4:7
  304. ^ Genesis 24:26
  305. ^ Genesis 31:33–34
  306. ^ Exodus 21:10
  307. ^ Exodus 21:11
  308. ^ One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain : Singer, Isidore ; et al., eds. (1901–1906). “Husband and Wife”, The Jewish Encyclopedia, New York: Funk & Wagnalls.
  309. ^ Jump up to: a b This article incorporates text from the 1903 Encyclopaedia Biblica article “Jealousy, Ordeal of”, a publication now in the public domain,
  310. ^ One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain : Singer, Isidore ; et al., eds. (1901–1906). “Adultery”, The Jewish Encyclopedia, New York: Funk & Wagnalls.
  311. ^ Malachi 2:15–16
  312. ^ Ezekiel 16:40
  313. ^ Leviticus 20:10
  314. ^ Deuteronomy 22:22–25
  315. ^ Peake’s commentary on the Bible (1962 edition), ad loc
  316. ^ Numbers 5:11–31
  317. ^ Jeremiah 7:9
  318. ^ Jeremiah 23:10
  319. ^ Hosea 4:2
  320. ^ Malachi 3:5
  321. ^ Jump up to: a b WILLIAMSON, MALCOLM (1998). The Sacred and the Feminine in Ancient Greece, Psychology Press. ISBN 9780415126632,
  322. ^ “Greek Women: Marriage and Divorce”, www.pbs.org, Retrieved 28 June 2021,
  323. ^ “Marriage, a History.” Psychology Today, 1 May 2005
  324. ^ “Magnus Hirschfeld Archive of Sexology”, Erwin J. Haeberle.
  325. ^ Frier and McGinn, Casebook, p.53.
  326. ^ “Roman empire.net marriage”, Roman-empire.net. Archived from the original on 12 February 2009.
  327. ^ Treggiari, Susan (1993). Roman Marriage: Isusti Coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian, Clarendon Press.p.39. ISBN 978-0-19-814939-2,
  328. ^ Tacitus (by commentator Edward Brooks).2013. The Germany and the Agricola of Tacitus, Project Gutenberg. Footnotes 121-122.
  329. ^ Herlihy, David. (1985). Medieval Households, Harvard University Press, pp.73–5, ISBN 0-674-56376-X,
  330. ^ Green, Dennis Howard and Siegmund, Frank.2003. The Continental Saxons from the Migration Period to the Tenth Century, Boydell Press.p.107
  331. ^ McSheffrey, Shannon (2006). Marriage, sex, and civic culture in late medieval London, University of Pennsylvania Press.p.21. ISBN 978-0-8122-3938-6,
  332. ^ “St. Ignatius of Antioch to Polycarp (Roberts-Donaldson translation)”, Earlychristianwritings.com.2 February 2006.
  333. ^ Jump up to: a b c Pernoud, Régine (2000). Those terrible Middle Ages: debunking the myths, San Francisco: Ignatius Press.p.102, ISBN 978-0-89870-781-6,
  334. ^ Jump up to: a b Excerpt from Marriage, Sex, and Civic Culture in Late Medieval London Archived 23 March 2009 at the Wayback Machine “the sacramental bond of marriage could be made only through the freely given consent of both parties.”
  335. ^ “marriage.about.com”, marriage.about.com.16 June 2010.
  336. ^ “Marriage Records”, Exploregenealogy.co.uk.29 October 2007.
  337. ^ Jump up to: a b Esparza Zabalegi, Jose Mari (March 2010). “Matrimonios a lo Navarro”. Nabarralde Kazeta (7): 45.
  338. ^ Hanawalt, Barbara A.1986. The Ties That Bound: Peasant Families in Medieval England. Oxford University Press, Inc. Pg 96
  339. ^ Hanawalt, pp.98–100
  340. ^ 33. Young, Bruce W.2008. Family Life in the Age of Shakespeare, Greenwood Press. pp.21, 24, 28
  341. ^ John T. Koch, Antone Minard.2012. The Celts: History, Life, and Culture. ABC-CLIO.p.495
  342. ^ Young, Bruce W.2008. Family Life in the Age of Shakespeare. Greenwood Press. pp.16–17, 20
  343. ^ Greif, Avner.2005. Family Structure, Institutions, and Growth: The Origin and Implications of Western Corporatism. Stanford University.2011. pp.2–3. “Archived copy” (PDF), Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 September 2015, Retrieved 2015-11-20, } : CS1 maint: archived copy as title ( link )
  344. ^ Levin, Eve.1995. Sex and Society in the World of the Orthodox Slavs, 900-1700, Cornell University Press. pp 96-98
  345. ^ Levin, 1995; pp.137, 142
  346. ^ Levin, 1995; pp.225–27
  347. ^ Stone, Linda. (2010). Kinship and Gender, Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, pp.231–36, ISBN 0-8133-4402-6,
  348. ^ Schofield, Phillipp R. (2003). Peasant and community in Medieval England, 1200–1500, Medieval culture and society. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.p.98, ISBN 0-333-64710-6,
  349. ^ Jump up to: a b Laslett, Peter. (1965). The World We Have Lost. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.p.82, ISBN 0-415-31527-1,
  350. ^ Coontz, Stephanie. (2005). Marriage, a History: From Obedience to Intimacy, or How Love Conquered Marriage, New York: Viking Press, Penguin Group Inc. pp.125–29, ISBN 0-14-303667-X,
  351. ^ Kertzer, David I and Marzio Barbagli. (2001). The history of the European family, New Haven: Yale University Press.p. xxii, ISBN 0-300-09090-0,
  352. ^ Lehmberg, Stanford E. and Samantha A. Meigs. (2008). The Peoples of the British Isles: A New History: From Prehistoric Times to 1688. Lyceum Books.p.117, ISBN 1-933478-01-2,
  353. ^ De Moor, Tine; Van Zanden, Jan Luiten (2010). “Girl power: The European marriage pattern and labour markets in the North Sea region in the late medieval and early modern period”. The Economic History Review,63 : 1–33 (17). doi : 10.1111/j.1468-0289.2009.00483.x,
  354. ^ Bullough, Vern L. (3 June 2014). Adolescence, Sexuality, and the Criminal Law: Multidisciplinary Perspectives,p.37. ISBN 978-1-317-95499-6, Retrieved 18 October 2015,
  355. ^ Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). “History of Marriage”, Catholic Encyclopedia, New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  356. ^ West’s Encyclopedia of American Law, 2nd Edition. Thomson Gale, 2005. ISBN 0-7876-6367-0
  357. ^ Leneman, Leah (1999). “The Scottish Case That Led to Hardwicke’s Marriage Act”, Law and History Review. Archived from the original on 6 July 2008, Retrieved 8 June 2008,
  358. ^ Gillis, John R. (1985). For Better, for Worse: British Marriages, 1600 to the Present, Oxford University Press.p.92, ISBN 978-0-19-503614-5,
  359. ^ “Marriage|LII / Legal Information Institute”, Topics.law.cornell.edu.19 August 2010. Archived from the original on 25 March 2011.
  360. ^ Westermarck, Edward Alexander (1903). The History of Human Marriage (reprint ed.). Macmillan and Co., Ltd., London, ISBN 978-1-4021-8548-9,
  361. ^ Vucheva, Elitsa. (30 July 2013) / Social Affairs / Europeans marry older, less often, Euobserver.com. Retrieved on 5 September 2013.
  362. ^ “Danwei”, Retrieved 7 October 2014,
  363. ^ Spencer, Richard (21 August 2003). “China relaxes laws on love and marriage”, The Daily Telegraph, London. Archived from the original on 10 January 2022.
See also:  What Is Forbearance In Contract Law?

What are the 3 types of descent?

Introduction to Sociology 2e, Marriage and Family, What Is Marriage? What Is a Family? When considering one’s lineage, most people in the United States look to both their father’s and mother’s sides. Both paternal and maternal ancestors are considered part of one’s family.

  • This pattern of tracing kinship is called bilateral descent,
  • Note that kinship, or one’s traceable ancestry, can be based on blood or marriage or adoption.
  • Sixty percent of societies, mostly modernized nations, follow a bilateral descent pattern.
  • Unilateral descent (the tracing of kinship through one parent only) is practiced in the other 40 percent of the world’s societies, with high concentration in pastoral cultures (O’Neal 2006).

There are three types of unilateral descent: patrilineal, which follows the father’s line only; matrilineal, which follows the mother’s side only; and ambilineal, which follows either the father’s only or the mother’s side only, depending on the situation.

In partrilineal societies, such as those in rural China and India, only males carry on the family surname. This gives males the prestige of permanent family membership while females are seen as only temporary members (Harrell 2001).U.S. society assumes some aspects of partrilineal decent. For instance, most children assume their father’s last name even if the mother retains her birth name.

In matrilineal societies, inheritance and family ties are traced to women. Matrilineal descent is common in Native American societies, notably the Crow and Cherokee tribes. In these societies, children are seen as belonging to the women and, therefore, one’s kinship is traced to one’s mother, grandmother, great grandmother, and so on (Mails 1996).

  1. In ambilineal societies, which are most common in Southeast Asian countries, parents may choose to associate their children with the kinship of either the mother or the father.
  2. This choice maybe based on the desire to follow stronger or more prestigious kinship lines or on cultural customs such as men following their father’s side and women following their mother’s side (Lambert 2009).

Tracing one’s line of descent to one parent rather than the other can be relevant to the issue of residence. In many cultures, newly married couples move in with, or near to, family members. In a patrilocal residence system it is customary for the wife to live with (or near) her husband’s blood relatives (or family or orientation).

Patrilocal systems can be traced back thousands of years. In a DNA analysis of 4,600-year-old bones found in Germany, scientists found indicators of patrilocal living arrangements (Haak et al 2008). Patrilocal residence is thought to be disadvantageous to women because it makes them outsiders in the home and community; it also keeps them disconnected from their own blood relatives.

See also:  What Temperature Scale Must Be Used When Applying Charles Law?

In China, where patrilocal and patrilineal customs are common, the written symbols for maternal grandmother ( wáipá ) are separately translated to mean “outsider” and “women” (Cohen 2011). Similarly, in matrilocal residence systems, where it is customary for the husband to live with his wife’s blood relatives (or her family of orientation), the husband can feel disconnected and can be labeled as an outsider.

The Minangkabau people, a matrilocal society that is indigenous to the highlands of West Sumatra in Indonesia, believe that home is the place of women and they give men little power in issues relating to the home or family (Joseph and Najmabadi 2003). Most societies that use patrilocal and patrilineal systems are patriarchal, but very few societies that use matrilocal and matrilineal systems are matriarchal, as family life is often considered an important part of the culture for women, regardless of their power relative to men.

: Introduction to Sociology 2e, Marriage and Family, What Is Marriage? What Is a Family?

What is an example of bilateral descent?

The Himba of Namibia live under a tribal structure based on bilateral descent. Bilateral descent is a system of family lineage in which the relatives on the mother’s side and father’s side are equally important for emotional ties or for transfer of property or wealth.

It is a family arrangement where descent and inheritance are passed equally through both parents. Families who use this system trace descent through both parents simultaneously and recognize multiple ancestors, but unlike with cognatic descent it is not used to form descent groups. While bilateral descent is increasingly the norm in Western culture, traditionally it is only found among relatively few groups in West Africa, India, Australia, Indonesia, Melanesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Polynesia,

Anthropologists believe that a tribal structure based on bilateral descent helps members live in extreme environments because it allows individuals to rely on two sets of families dispersed over a wide area. Historically, North Germanic peoples in Scandinavia the Late Iron Age and Early Middle Ages had a bilateral society, where the descent of both parents were important.

  • Genealogies featuring the legendary danish king Sigurd Snake-in-the-Eye gives him the matronymic name Áslaugsson due to his mother Aslaug ‘s connection to Völsungs,
  • Under bilateral descent, every tribe member belongs to two clans, one through the father (a patriclan) and another through the mother (a matriclan).

For example, among the Himba, clans are led by the eldest male in the clan. Sons live with their father’s clan and when daughters marry they go to live with the clan of their husband. However inheritance of wealth does not follow the patriclan but is determined by the matriclan i.e.

  • A son does not inherit his father’s cattle but his maternal uncle’s instead.
  • Javanese people, the largest ethnic group in Indonesia, also adopt a bilateral kinship system.
  • The Dimasa Kachari people of Northeast India has a system of dual family clan.
  • The Urapmin people, a small tribe in Papua New Guinea, have a system of kinship classes known as tanum miit,

The classes are inherited bilaterally from both parents. Since they also practice strict endogamy, most Urapmin belong to all of the major classes, creating great fluidity and doing little to differentiate individuals.

What is an example of a descent group?

Kinship – Descent Descent rules define socially recognized kin groups by tracing connections through chains of parent-child ties. A society may focus exclusively on connections traced through the male parent ( patrilineal ) or through the female parent ( matrilineal ).

  1. In either case, the culture is employing a unilineal, or single-line, descent system.
  2. When descent is patrilineal, the descent group is composed of people of either sex whose fathers belong to the group.
  3. Siblings belong to the descent group of their father, but their mother belongs to a different descent group, the group to which her father belongs.

Therefore, a man’s children will belong to his descent group, but a woman’s children will not belong to her descent group. Analogously, if descent is matrilineal, siblings belong to the mother’s group but their father does not. A woman’s children will belong to her descent group, but a man’s children will not belong to his.

  1. Sometimes a society will assign individuals to one unilineal descent group for one purpose and to the other for another purpose, resulting in a system of double descent.
  2. For example, the person’s patrilineal descent group may be in charge of political functions, while inheritance operates through the matrilineal descent group.

In contrast to societies that trace descent unilineally, individuals in some cultures such as the United States are characterized by bilateral descent rules, tracing relationships through both parents. In these societies, other institutions, such as governments, churches, businesses, and voluntary organizations, provide the structure and perform the functions of other societies’ kin-based groups.

In some societies, descent is traced through one parent for some people and through the other parent for other people; this is ambilineal descent. For instance, males may trace descent through their fathers, and females may trace descent through their mothers. Because unilineal descent rules produce bounded and nonoverlapping groups, unilineal descent is a more powerful organizing principle than bilateral descent in that unilineal descent groups are able to act as corporate groups on behalf of their members in a way that bilateral descent groups cannot.

Each patrilineal descent group in a society that traces descent through the father has a particular identity and membership that is entirely different from the identity and membership of any other patrilineal descent group in the same society. Where descent is traced bilaterally, by contrast, only full siblings belong to precisely the same descent group because only full siblings have the same parents.

  1. Where descent is reckoned bilaterally, a person tends to single out some relatives within his or her kin group as more important than others.
  2. This close circle of kin is referred to as one’s kindred.
  3. Who is included in one’s kindred and who is not is a matter of individual choice based upon individual preference and sentiment.

What is more, the definition of kindred shifts, depending upon circumstances. For instance, people in the United States are likely to count a smaller number of relatives as close when planning the guest list for Christmas dinner than when they are writing wedding invitations.

  1. In either case, because bilateral descent groups fan out indefinitely, it becomes hard to decide where to draw the line between kin who are close and kin who are not.
  2. Since each person belongs to a unique descent group and different bilateral descent groups in the same society have somewhat overlapping but also somewhat different memberships, these groups cannot function effectively as representatives of their members.

Unilineal descent, specifically patrilineal descent, is the most common system of reckoning (Ember and Ember 1988). Therefore, the majority of cultures around the world exploit blood and marriage connections to maximize the power and effectiveness of the kin group in supervising a wide variety of activities in which individuals participate.

Unilineal descent groups are important sources of political power in many societies. The leaders can arbitrate disputes between individuals within the descent group or between different descent groups. They can go to war in support of a group member and retaliate for wrongs done to one of their own. Unilineal descent groups can delegate land rights and often act as a kind of government vis-à-vis the members.

Unilineal descent groups also have important economic roles. Such groups can own land, money, houses, religious places and objects, songs, economic capital, and even personal names. Property is often inherited through the unilineal descent group. Unilineal Family trees are one of the oldest ways to organize and display genealogical data on consanguineal and affinal relationships.

This family tree traces lineages back to the 1760s. CATHERINE KARNOW/CORBIS descent groups can lend money and maintain members who have no other means of support. The unilineal descent group is also commonly the center of religious activity. Often a descent group is identified with supernatural beings who may be ancestors or claimed ancestors of members of the group.

Supernaturals may be believed to protect and otherwise affect the members of the group, and the members may, in turn, be required to engage in particular activities in an effort to influence the actions of the supernatural. Particular descent groups can also be associated with particular sets of taboos that the members of the group are obligated to honor.

Marriages, often regulated by the unilineal descent group, may be prohibited or preferred between members of the same descent group, depending upon the norms of the group. Unilineal descent groups may also take over the burden of providing what are sometimes very costly payments to the bride or bride’s family when a member of the group is married.

: Kinship – Descent

Why older couples don’t need marriage?

Preserving your benefits – Many older couples decide not to get married because they don’t want to lose spousal Social Security benefits or a former spouse’s pension, says Lili Vasileff, a certified financial planner and president emeritus of the Association of Divorce Financial Planners.

Divorced spouses are eligible for Social Security benefits based on their ex-spouse’s earnings record as long as the marriage lasted for at least 10 years (see Best Strategies to Boost Your Social Security Benefits ). That’s a particularly valuable benefit for women who left the workforce to care for children or aging parents and have limited benefits of their own.

They’ll lose that benefit, though, if they remarry. Widows or widowers who remarry before age 60 lose survivor benefits based on their deceased spouse’s earnings. Most widows receive a higher benefit by claiming their husband’s monthly benefit instead of their own, according to the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.

  1. If your second marriage ends in divorce or your spouse dies, you have the right to reapply for benefits based on your first spouse’s earnings.
  2. Unless the divorce decree says other­wise, remarriage will end alimony payments from a former spouse.
  3. In some states, cohabitation is also grounds for terminating alimony payments, although states are having a tough time figuring out how to define the term, Vasileff says.

Remarriage could also mean losing a deceased spouse’s pension benefits or other types of survivor benefits, such as annuities paid to spouses of police officers and firefighters. David Demming, a certified financial planner in Aurora, Ohio, says one of his clients has been living with her partner for more than 20 years because she doesn’t want to lose her late husband’s worker’s compensation death benefit.

What is it called when you live with someone for 7 years but not married?

Common Law Marriage – Common law marriage is allowed in a minority of states. A common law marriage is a legally recognized marriage between two people who have not purchased a marriage license or had their marriage solemnized by a ceremony. Not all states have statutes addressing common law marriage.

What is a platonic marriage called?

What Are Platonic Marriages? – Platonic marriages are legal unions based on practicality or a meaningful connection rather than romance or physical attraction. Typically, these marriages occur between close friends who have love and respect for one another but are not physically involved. However, they decide to get married and spend life as a unit, reaping the benefits of marriage.

What does dating a unicorn mean?

I Dated a Couple, and Here’s What You Should Know Before Putting Yourself Out There He was sweet and inquisitive, and she was funny and a little shy. They each asked me questions, while he held her hand between their beers. I immediately liked that he was openly affectionate toward her, while at the same time trying to learn more about me.

I was hoping to, “Unicorn” describes a person who joins a couple as their third partner, for sex or even for something more committed. It earned its mythical name because willing participants tend to be rare and difficult to find, though online dating has helped connect unicorns with couples more easily than ever (there’s even an app for seeking out a unicorn relationship, ).

It was never really a title I thought I’d be interested in trying out, but after years of singledom I found myself more sexually curious than I’d been before. It’s not like I was questioning my sexual identity, but I was deeply interested in exploring its nuances.

  • Simple adjustments to my online dating profiles opened the gate for messages from couples—and a rush of options.
  • Even in conversation, it felt good to be someone who could fulfill not just one person’s fantasy, but two at once.
  • But I quickly discovered that, like any type of dating, this arrangement can sometimes be complicated and confusing.

For the unicorn, there are two people to impress, two people to be impressed by, and three sets of wants, needs, and desires that you have to contend with if you’re going to have an enjoyable, comfortable time. The couple I met for drinks was also new to three-person dating.

We settled into conversation that felt natural and flirtatious, and ended the night with hugs and promises to make plans in the future. We never quite made it to the bedroom, though. A solo date with the husband led to hurt feelings for the wife, despite our agreement that I’d hang out with both of them separately.

It’s always tricky to navigate other people’s emotions, and even sometimes our own. Think you might be a good fit for a unicorn relationship? I found it helpful to ask myself these questions and answer them as honestly as I possibly could before I put myself out there: : I Dated a Couple, and Here’s What You Should Know Before Putting Yourself Out There

What is a poly girlfriend?

Polyamorous people have multiple loving, intentional, and intimate relationships at the same time. Polyamory is a type of open or non-monogamous relationship that follows certain guidelines. Polyamory specifically refers to people who have multiple romantic relationships at the same time.

Solo polyamory includes people who don’t have primary partnerships but date multiple people. They remain mostly independent in their personal lives.Polyfidelity refers to a group of three or more people who have a committed relationship with each other and do not date outside of the group. Hierarchical polyamory means people who have primary partnerships to which they devote the most time and attention, and secondary and tertiary partnerships that receive less time and attention. The primary partner may have more power over important decisions.Non-hierarchical polyamory refers to people who don’t have a hierarchy of partners. It is also called egalitarian polyamory or relationship anarchy. Each partner may receive equal time and attention. They may also have equal input on important life choices.

What is it called when a married couple has a boyfriend?

What Is Polyamory and Why Is it Having a Moment? Polyamorous marriage is having a moment. The spike in this alternative marriage arrangement is happening with young, married couples who have been married for a few years, yet long for “something more.” From the Greek “Polloi” meaning “many” and Latin “amor” for love, this growing lifestyle is about mutually changing your monogamous agreement.

Whether you dare to do it or just want to know about it, there are some things to learn about this experimental way of being married. Polyamory differs from straight-up cheating, which involves spouses doing it behind each other’s back. It also differs from Polygamy where only one person gets to have many partners.

Also known as “consensual polyamory” or “relationship anarchy,” this new form of marriage is secretly surging. “Couples who consider themselves primary to one another but crave something more are trying this relationship situation,” says Dr. Tammy Nelson, a sex and relationship therapist, sex researcher, and author of the new book The New Monogamy, Redefining Your Relationship After Infidelity.

“A more open monogamy might include other sexual partners.”, the dating site for mostly married people looking to cheat with other married people recently published a study called “Love Beyond Lockdown: A Report on Navigating Marriage and Infidelity Through A Pandemic And A New Normal.” The amazingly popular site’s slogan is “Life is short, have an affair.” Through a series of anonymous member surveys, the company wanted to learn about married life during the lockdown and why so many married people are having extramarital affairs while at home with their spouse.

The study addresses topics including increased stress, sex, divorce, cheating during a pandemic, and “the future of marriage and monogamy.” The study concluded with a few key findings.

“Lack of sexual initiation is the primary complaint of married people during lockdown,” the study found. Seventy-five percent of cheaters don’t look to their partner in times of uncertainty and stress, so they go outside the marriage. The pandemic has not decreased the desire or ability to cheat, in fact, it has fueled it.

To understand the future of polyamorous marriage, a little history puts it in perspective. Formerly known as “group marriage,” polyamory has its roots in the free-love movement of the late 1960s and 70s in California. The term “polyfidelity” was coined around 1971 by the Kerista commune, a hippie communal living arrangement in San Francisco.

It differs from “swinging” which is consensual sex in the same room with another couple. Polyamory can involve actually falling in love with someone other than your spouse. While having a new, exciting relationship and falling in love with someone else while you are still married sounds fun, the downside of all of this is jealousy.

Watching your husband or wife fall in love with someone in front of you can be devastating. But the hippies figured this poly dilemma out by using the concept of “Compersion,” which is a “feeling of pleasure or deep emotion arising from your partner being with another partner.

  • Often referred to as the opposite of jealousy.
  • Polyamory is not for anyone who is jealous of other people moving in on their husband or wife.
  • It often works as a marriage alternative for couples who have been together for a while and are on the verge of a divorce due to sexual dissatisfaction, or couples who want to explore something new.

“After infidelity, she says “both partners lose trust and faith in each other. What happens when this implicit agreement is broken?” says Dr. Nelson, “The new monogamy contract is a relationship agreement where each partner has a say in setting the ground rules for the relationship.” This could also include everything from letting each other have non-sexual dates with other people, having sex with other people, or having sex with other people in front of each other.

Or maybe she wants a threesome fantasy with another guy in there. The point here is that in non-monogamous relationships, it’s usually the woman who comes up with the rules. As with any “alternative” sex practice, open communication is essential. “When the pandemic is lifted we may see that some marriages didn’t make it,” says Dr.

Nelson, “their couplehood wasn’t strong enough to get through the pandemic. Other couples will find that they are closer than ever. One thing that the pandemic has taught couples was to be more honest with each other about their needs and desires.” Becoming more transparent about what you like and don’t like is the way to a better marriage and a better sex life.

  • Everyone needs to feel desired and appreciated in a relationship.
  • They also need to feel sexually excited by their partner.
  • Non-monogamy sounds like a radical concept, “but couples may occasionally need to find an outside relationship to fill in the gaps,” says Dr. Nelson.
  • She also says that women are often the ones who want changes in the relationship.

“Women are not settling for dissatisfying sex anymore.” And sometimes it’s not just about the sex. Most sex therapists will tell you that some couples say their sex life is wonderful, but they crave more emotional intimacy with their partner. The Ashley Madison study found that many people cheating were also looking for an “emotional connection” that has been lost in the marriage.

  1. The problem with the pandemic, says Dr.
  2. Nelson, is that “it takes more effort to get to the point where couples are feeling connected again.
  3. The pandemic magnified issues that were a problem before, and couples are driving each other crazy.” So if non-monogamy is not something you are interested in doing, what should you do? One take-away from all of this is that neurologically, we as humans need novelty and changes in our brain.

Before Covid-19 we went out on dates, we traveled, we went out and danced. Now we are stuck in the house 24-7 with each other. “Attraction happens in the space between you.” says Dr. Nelson. Pre-pandemic people went out and saw their friends, they went to work, they saw their families.

  • Now there are fewer social distractions.” Now people are sitting in the bed next to their spouse flirting with someone else on their phone,” says Dr. Nelson.
  • The good thing about this pandemic situation is that it has the potential to open up the conversation about the future of the relationship.
  • Is your relationship really working? What changes would you like to see? How can you make it better? Do you want to open up the relationship to other people or make what you have better? The future of monogamy for some couples could be more love and more sex, with your spouse.or with other people.

Brides takes every opportunity to use high-quality sources, including peer-reviewed studies, to support the facts within our articles. Read our to learn more about how we keep our content accurate, reliable and trustworthy. : What Is Polyamory and Why Is it Having a Moment?

What is a relationship with 2 partners called?

Polyamorous people have multiple loving, intentional, and intimate relationships at the same time. Polyamory is a type of open or non-monogamous relationship that follows certain guidelines. Polyamory specifically refers to people who have multiple romantic relationships at the same time.

Solo polyamory includes people who don’t have primary partnerships but date multiple people. They remain mostly independent in their personal lives.Polyfidelity refers to a group of three or more people who have a committed relationship with each other and do not date outside of the group. Hierarchical polyamory means people who have primary partnerships to which they devote the most time and attention, and secondary and tertiary partnerships that receive less time and attention. The primary partner may have more power over important decisions.Non-hierarchical polyamory refers to people who don’t have a hierarchy of partners. It is also called egalitarian polyamory or relationship anarchy. Each partner may receive equal time and attention. They may also have equal input on important life choices.

What are the 4 types of marriage?

Essentially, it can be said there four major types of marriage that can be conducted in Nigeria. These include the statutory marriage; customary marriage; church marriage; and Islamic marriage.

Which types of dating involves only two couple?

Exclusive dating occurs when partners in a relationship decide to only date each other.

What is a polyandry type marriage?

Home Lifestyles & Social Issues Sociology & Society polyandry, marriage of a woman to two or more men at the same time; the term derives from the Greek polys, “many,” and anēr, andros, “man.” When the husbands in a polyandrous marriage are brothers or are said to be brothers, the institution is called adelphic, or fraternal, polyandry.

  • Polygyny, the marriage of a man and two or more women at the same time, includes an analogous sororal form.
  • Polyandrous cultures have devised several methods through which to designate the ancestry of the children of such marriages.
  • In fraternal polyandry, the children are often said to be descended from the eldest brother alone, while in other cases fatherhood is established through a ceremony or the children are said to have descended from all the husbands equally.

A related form of marital union, sometimes called secondary marriage, obtains when a married woman cohabits with a man other than her husband without having terminated the marriage by annulment or divorce, Polyandry must be distinguished from privileged sexual access to a married woman, a practice that was fairly common in traditional cultures and was often associated with customs of kinship, hospitality, or fertility rites.

Polyandry is, in fact, a rare phenomenon, if not as rare as once thought, and understanding of the variables that define the term is evolving. The two best-known areas in which polyandry was studied and continued to be practiced into the 21st century are the Plateau of Tibet (a region shared by India, Nepal, and the Tibet Autonomous Region of China ) and the Marquesas Islands in the South Pacific,

In a report published in 2012, however, anthropologists Kathrine Starkweather and Raymond Hames identified 53 additional nonclassical societies throughout the world (including North America and South America) that also practice polyandry, whether formal (i.e., recognized by marriage and co-residence) or informal (when two or more men are considered the co-fathers of offspring and are invested in the care of both mother and child or children).

  • Polyandry is generally considered to be a response to peculiar localized conditions, among them sex (gender) ratios, adult male mortality, male absenteeism, social stratification, and the group’s economic basis.
  • Virtually all societies in which the practice of polyandry is accepted are based on hunting and gathering or on agriculturalism.

This article was most recently revised and updated by Kathleen Kuiper,