What Goes Up Must Come Down Law?
- Marvin Harvey
What goes up (down), must come down (up) “What goes up must come down” is a familiar phrase that means that any object that goes up because of the law of gravity must come down. For example, any bullet shot up in the air by the law of gravity eventually shoots down.
- Apart from the law of gravity, the law of averages can be seen to be another reason for the saying.
- That is, any spike from the normal value of a variable tends to be corrected by a subsequent abnormal low so that the two values even out to equal the average.
- In the past 10 years, inflation has normalized and averaged at 3 percent.
When in 2018 the government failed to import rice, the price of rice spiked. So, in September 2018, inflation peaked to 6.7 percent. That is more than twice the double of the average. What goes up must come down. Thanks to the eventual importation of rice, what went up in September 2018 went down in September 2019 to 0.9 percent.
- The two eventually averaged out to 3.8 percent.
- Not exactly 3 percent, but close enough.
- The correction has to do with the jargon that is the “base effect.” If the normal inflation is 3 percent, a commodity that is worth P100 today is expected to be worth P103 next year and P106 the following year, thus an average annual inflation of 3 percent.
However, suppose the price of the P100 commodity increases to P105 next year resulting in an abnormal high of 5 percent inflation. In the following year, the same is then expected to increase to P106 resulting in an abnormal low of 1 percent inflation.
Because the increase to P106 is relatively a small increase from a high base of P105, what goes up at 5 percent must go down at 1 percent resulting in an average inflation of 3 percent. In recent months, mainly because of the failure to protect the hog industry from the African swine fever, inflation in meat shoot up to an abnormal over 20 percent.
The result is that overall inflation in February shot up to 4.7 percent, which is the highest since 2018. As the ASF continues to hurt the hog industry, inflation in meat is expected to pressure the overall inflation to increase even higher. Yes, what goes up must come down, but inflation in meat is expected to go up and remain up for awhile before it will go down.
As for the application of the law of averages on inflation and commodity prices, “what goes down must come up” is also true. Suppose the price of the P100 commodity increases to P101 next year resulting in an abnormal low of 1 percent inflation. In the following year, the same is then expected to increase to P106 resulting in an abnormal high of 5 percent inflation.
What goes up must come down, or does it?!
Because the increase to P106 is a relatively big increase from a low base of P101, what goes down to 1 percent must go up to 5 percent resulting in an average inflation of 3 percent. Because of the Covid-19, countries in different levels suffered supply chain disruptions and economic shutdowns in 2020.
- With the peak of disruptions and economic shutdowns in April 2020, the global price of oil troughed.
- For example, Dubai crude troughed to $23 per barrel.
- This is equivalent to over 60 percent drop from its approximate normal of $60 per barrel the past five years.
- It is no coincidence that inflation in May 2020 dropped to 2.1 percent, which is the lowest it had been since December 2019.
Inflation has since increase from then on. What goes down must come up. The global price of oil has slowly normalized. As of March 5, 2021, Dubai crude stood at $67 per barrel. If the price remains the same to April, the price will increase from $23 to $67 per barrel or an annual increase of over 190 percent.
Incidentally, this author approximates that inflation tends to increase by 1.5 percent per 100 percent increase in the price of Dubai crude. This translates to additional pressure for inflation to increase by 2.9 percent. Counting for oil only, the inflation of 2.1 percent in April 2020 can shoot up to 5 percent in April 2021.
Counting for oil and ASF together, what goes up will come down, but not after inflation goes up even higher in the coming months. Luis F. Dumlao, PhD is the Dean of the John Gokongwei School of Management, Ateneo de Manila University. Previous Article
Which law says anything that goes up must come down?
Free and Funny Reminders Ecard: Newton’s third law of motion states; “what goes up must come down.” Toilet seats are not exempt from the laws of physics. Create and send your ow – : Newton’s third law of motion states; “what goes up must come down.” Toilet seats are not exempt from the laws of physics.
Did Isaac Newton say what goes up must come down?
Quote by Isaac Newton: ‘ What goes up must come down.’
What is 1st 2nd and 3rd law?
Newton’s laws of motion | Definition, Examples, & History Newton’s laws of motion relate an object’s motion to the forces acting on it. In the first law, an object will not change its motion unless a force acts on it. In the second law, the force on an object is equal to its mass times its acceleration.
- In the third law, when two objects interact, they apply forces to each other of equal magnitude and opposite direction.
- Newton’s laws of motion are important because they are the foundation of classical mechanics, one of the main branches of,
- Is the study of how objects move or do not move when forces act upon them.
Newton’s laws of motion, three statements describing the relations between the forces acting on a body and the of the body, first formulated by English physicist and mathematician, which are the foundation of classical, Newton’s first law states that if a body is at rest or moving at a constant speed in a straight line, it will remain at rest or keep moving in a straight line at constant speed unless it is acted upon by a,
In fact, in classical Newtonian mechanics, there is no important distinction between rest and in a straight line; they may be regarded as the same state of motion seen by different observers, one moving at the same as the particle and the other moving at constant velocity with respect to the particle.
This is known as the law of, The was first formulated by for horizontal motion on Earth and was later generalized by, Although the principle of inertia is the starting point and the fundamental assumption of classical mechanics, it is less than intuitively obvious to the untrained eye.
In Aristotelian mechanics and in ordinary experience, objects that are not being pushed tend to come to rest. The law of inertia was deduced by Galileo from his experiments with balls rolling down inclined planes. For Galileo, the principle of inertia was fundamental to his central scientific task: he had to explain how is it possible that if Earth is really spinning on its axis and orbiting the Sun, we do not sense that motion.
The principle of inertia helps to provide the answer: since we are in motion together with Earth and our natural tendency is to retain that motion, Earth appears to us to be at rest. Thus, the principle of inertia, far from being a statement of the obvious, was once a central issue of scientific,
By the time Newton had sorted out all the details, it was possible to accurately account for the small deviations from this picture caused by the fact that the motion of Earth’s surface is not uniform motion in a straight line (the effects of rotational motion are discussed below). In the Newtonian formulation, the common observation that bodies that are not pushed tend to come to rest is attributed to the fact that they have unbalanced forces acting on them, such as and air resistance.
: Newton’s laws of motion | Definition, Examples, & History
What does the law of gravity state?
Newton’s law of gravitation, statement that any particle of matter in the universe attracts any other with a force varying directly as the product of the masses and inversely as the square of the distance between them. In symbols, the magnitude of the attractive force F is equal to G (the gravitational constant, a number the size of which depends on the system of units used and which is a universal constant) multiplied by the product of the masses ( m 1 and m 2 ) and divided by the square of the distance R: F = G ( m 1 m 2 )/ R 2,
- Isaac Newton put forward the law in 1687 and used it to explain the observed motions of the planets and their moons, which had been reduced to mathematical form by Johannes Kepler early in the 17th century.
- The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica This article was most recently revised and updated by Barbara A.
What are Murphy’s three laws?
Murphy’s Law – Murphy’s First Law: Anything that can go wrong will go wrong. Murphy’s Second Law: Nothing is as easy as it looks. Murphy’s Third Law: Everything takes longer than you think it will. Murphy’s Fourth Law: If there is a possibility of several things going wrong, the one that will cause the most damage will be the one to go wrong.
Corollary: If there is a worse time for something to go wrong, it will happen then. Murphy’s Fifth Law: If anything simply cannot go wrong, it will anyway. Murphy’s Sixth Law: If you perceive that there are four possible ways in which a procedure can go wrong, and circumvent these, then a fifth way, unprepared for, will promptly develop.
Murphy’s Seventh Law: Left to themselves, things tend to go from bad to worse. Murphy’s Eighth Law: If everything seems to be going well, you have obviously overlooked something. Murphy’s Ninth Law: Nature always sides with the hidden flaw. Murphy’s Tenth Law: Mother nature is a bitch.
- Murphy’s Eleventh Law: It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so ingenious.
- Murphy’s Twelfth Law: Whenever you set out to do something, something else must be done first.
- Murphy’s Thirteenth Law: Every solution breeds new problems.
- Murphy’s Fourteenth Law: If anything can’t go wrong on its own, someone will make it go wrong.
If Murphy’s Law can go wrong, it will. Knowing Murphy’s Law won’t help either. Murphy’s Law is recursive. Washing your car to make it rain doesn’t work. Murphy’s Time-Action Quandary: You never know how soon is too late. O’Toole’s Commentary On Murphy’s Law: Murphy was an optimist.
- Proof of Murphy’s Law: Murphy’s Law cannot be proven, yet is correct, as when you try to prove Murphy’s Law, you will see that the proof is incorrect.
- This is obviously due to Murphy’s Law, therefore Murphy’s Law is correct and proven.
- Stewart’s Corollary to Murphy’s Law: Murphy’s Law may be delayed or suspended for an indefinite period of time, provided that such delay or suspension will result in a greater catastrophe at a later date.
Zymurgy’s Seventh Exception to Murphy’s Laws: When it rains, it pours.
What does the 3rd law mean?
Whenever one object exerts a force on a second object, the second object exerts an equal and opposite force on the first. – His third law states that for every action (force) in nature there is an equal and opposite reaction, If object A exerts a force on object B, object B also exerts an equal and opposite force on object A. In other words, forces result from interactions.
What is Newton’s famous quote?
Isaac Newton quotes – “Amicus Plato amicus Aristoteles magis amica verita.” (Plato is my friend, Aristotle is my friend, but my greatest friend is truth.) —Written in the margin of a notebook while a student at Cambridge. In Richard S. Westfall, Never at Rest (1980), 89.
“Genius is patience.” — The Homiletic Review, Vol.83-84 (1922), Vol.84, 290. “If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.” —Letter to Robert Hooke (5 Feb 1675-6).In H.W. Turnbull (ed.), The Correspondence of Isaac Newton, 1, 1661-1675 (1959), Vol.1, 416. “I see I have made my self a slave to Philosophy.” —Letter to Henry Oldenburg (18 Nov 1676).
In H.W. Turnbull (ed.), The Correspondence of Isaac Newton, 1676-1687 (1960), Vol.2, 182. “I do not know what I may appear to the world, but to myself I seem to have been only like a boy playing on the seashore, and diverting myself in now and then finding a smoother pebble or a prettier shell than ordinary, whilst the great ocean of truth lay all undiscovered before me.” —First reported in Joseph Spence, Anecdotes, Observations and Characters, of Books and Men (1820), Vol.1 of 1966 edn, sect.1259, p.462 “To any action there is always an opposite and equal reaction; in other words, the actions of two bodies upon each other are always equal and always opposite in direction.” — The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy (1687) “Truth is ever to be found in simplicity, and not in the multiplicity and confusion of things.” —’Fragments from a Treatise on Revelation”.
Are Newtons laws still true?
Changing ideas about gravity – In Newton’s view, all objects — from his not-so-apocryphal apple to planets and stars — exert a force that attracts other objects. That universal law of gravitation worked pretty well for predicting the motion of planets as well as objects on Earth — and it’s still used, for example, when making the calculations for a rocket launch,
- But Newton’s view of gravity didn’t work for some things, like Mercury’s peculiar orbit around the sun.
- The orbits of planets shift over time, and Mercury’s orbit shifted faster than Newton predicted.
- Einstein offered a different view of gravity, one that made sense of Mercury.
- Instead of exerting an attractive force, he reasoned that each object curves the fabric of space and time around them, forming a sort of well that other objects — and even beams of light — fall into.
Think of the sun as a bowling ball on a mattress. It creates a depression that draws the planets close. This new model solved the Mercury problem. It showed that the sun so curves space that it distorts the orbits of nearby bodies, including Mercury. In Einstein’s view, Mercury might look like a marble forever circling the bottom of a drain. Like all massive objects, the Earth warps the fabric of space. NASA’s Imagine the Universe Einstein’s theory has been confirmed by more than a century of experiments, starting with one involving a 1919 solar eclipse in which the path of light from distant stars was shifted by the sun’s intense gravitation — by just the amount Einstein had predicted.
What is Newton’s first law quote?
Newton’s first law: An object at rest remains at rest, or if in motion, remains in motion at a constant velocity unless acted on by a net external force.
What’s Newton’s 4th law?
Newton’s Law of gravitation is called Newton’s fourth law. It states that every point mass attracts every other point mass by a force acting along the line intersecting both points.
Why second law is A real law?
This can be proved by showing that first law and third law are contained in second law of motion. That is if no force is acting on the body then its acceleration is zero, means if a body is at rest, it remains at rest and if the body is moving in straight line with constant velocity, it continues to do so.
Which is an example of 3rd law?
Introduction/Motivation – Newton’s third law of motion builds further on the first and second laws of motion. The third law of motion states that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. This can be observed both in objects at rest and those that are accelerating. copyright Copyright © (door knob) 2014 Denise W. Carlson, College of Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder; (airplane) 2004 Microsoft Corporation, One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA 98052-6399 USA. All rights reserved. http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/images/results.aspx?qu=airplane&ex=1#ai:MP900442454|mt:2| Newton’s third law can also be observed in rockets and other projectiles.
Which of the three laws is gravity?
Newton’s law of universal gravitation is usually stated as that every particle attracts every other particle in the universe with a force that is proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between their centers.
- The publication of the law has become known as the ” first great unification “, as it marked the unification of the previously described phenomena of gravity on Earth with known astronomical behaviors.
- This is a general physical law derived from empirical observations by what Isaac Newton called inductive reasoning,
It is a part of classical mechanics and was formulated in Newton’s work Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica (“the Principia “), first published on 5 July 1687. When Newton presented Book 1 of the unpublished text in April 1686 to the Royal Society, Robert Hooke made a claim that Newton had obtained the inverse square law from him. where F is the gravitational force acting between two objects, m 1 and m 2 are the masses of the objects, r is the distance between the centers of their masses, and G is the gravitational constant, The first test of Newton’s law of gravitation between masses in the laboratory was the Cavendish experiment conducted by the British scientist Henry Cavendish in 1798.
It took place 111 years after the publication of Newton’s Principia and approximately 71 years after his death. Newton’s law of gravitation resembles Coulomb’s law of electrical forces, which is used to calculate the magnitude of the electrical force arising between two charged bodies. Both are inverse-square laws, where force is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the bodies.
Coulomb’s law has the product of two charges in place of the product of the masses, and the Coulomb constant in place of the gravitational constant. Newton’s law has later been superseded by Albert Einstein ‘s theory of general relativity, but the universality of gravitational constant is intact and the law still continues to be used as an excellent approximation of the effects of gravity in most applications.
Is gravity a law or theory?
Gravity: It’s Only a Theory | National Center for Science Education All physics textbook should include this warning label: This textbook contains material on Gravity. Universal Gravity is a theory, not a fact, regarding the natural law of attraction.
- This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully, and critically considered.
- The Universal Theory of Gravity is often taught in schools as a fact, when in fact it is not even a good theory.
- First of all, no one has measured gravity for every atom and every star.
- It is simply a religious belief that it is “universal”.
Secondly, school textbooks routinely make false statements. For example, “the moon goes around the earth.” If the theory of gravity were true, it would show that the sun’s gravitational force on the moon is much stronger than the earth’s gravitational force on the moon, so the moon would go around the sun.
- Anybody can look up at night and see the obvious gaps in gravity theory.
- The existence of tides is often taken as a proof of gravity, but this is logically flawed.
- Because if the moon’s “gravity” were responsible for a bulge underneath it, then how can anyone explain a high tide on the opposite side of the earth at the same time? Anyone can observe that there are two — not one — high tides every day.
It is far more likely that tides were given us by an Intelligent Creator long ago and they have been with us ever since. In any case, the fact that there are two high tides falsifies gravity. There are numerous other flaws. For example, astronomers, who seem to have a fetish for gravity, tell us that the moon rotates on its axis but at the same time it always presents the same face to the earth.
- This is patently absurd.
- Moreover, if gravity were working on the early earth, then earth would have been bombarded out of existence by falling asteroids, meteors, comets, and other space junk.
- Furthermore, gravity theory suggests that the planets have been moving in orderly orbits for millions and millions of years, which wholly contradicts the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
Since everything in the Universe tends to disorder according to the Second Law, orderly orbits are impossible. This cannot be resolved by pointing to the huge outpouring of energy from the sun. In fact, it is known that the flux of photons from the sun and the “solar wind” actually tends to push earth away.
There are numerous alternative theories that should be taught on an equal basis. For example, the observed behavior of the earth’s revolving around the sun can be perfectly explained if the sun has a net positive charge and the planets have a net negative charge, since opposite charges attract and the force is an inverse-square law, exactly as proposed by the increasingly discredited Theory of Gravity.
Physics and chemistry texts emphasize that this is the explanation for electrons going around the nucleus, so if it works for atoms, why not for the solar system? The answer is simple: scientific orthodoxy. The US Patent Office has never issued a patent for anti-gravity.
- Why is this? According to natural law and homeopathy, everything exists in opposites: good–evil; grace–sin; positive charges–negative charges; north poles–south poles; good vibes–bad vibes; and so on.
- We know there are anti-evolutionists, so why not anti-gravitationalists? It is clearly a matter of the scientific establishment elite’s protecting their own.
Anti-gravity papers are routinely rejected from peerreviewed journals, and scientists who propose anti-gravity quickly lose their funding. Universal gravity theory is just a way to keep the grant money flowing. Even Isaac Newton, said to be the discoverer of gravity, knew there were problems with the theory.
He claims to have invented the idea early in his life, but he knew that no mathematician of his day would approve his theory, so he invented a whole new branch of mathematics, called fluxions, just to “prove” his theory. This became calculus, a deeply flawed branch having to do with so-called “infinitesimals” which have never been observed.
Then when Einstein invented a new theory of gravity, he, too, used an obscure bit of mathematics called tensors. It seems that every time there is a theory of gravity, it is mixed up with fringe mathematics. Newton, by the way,was far from a secular scientist, and the bulk of his writings is actually on theology and Christianity.
- His dabbling in gravity, alchemy, and calculus was a mere sideline, perhaps an aberration best left forgotten in describing his career and faith in a Creator.
- To make matters worse, proponents of gravity theory hypothesize about mysterious things called gravitons and gravity waves.
- These have never been observed, and when some accounts of detecting gravity waves were published, the physicists involved had to quickly retract them.
Every account of anti-gravity and gravity waves quickly elicits laughter. This is not a theory suitable for children. And even children can see how ridiculous it is to imagine that people in Australia are upside down with respect to us, as gravity theory would have it.
- If this is an example of the predictive power of the theory of gravity,we can see that at the core there is no foundation.
- Gravity totally fails to explain why Saturn has rings and Jupiter does not.
- It utterly fails to account for obesity.
- In fact, what it does “explain” is far outweighed by what it does not explain.
When the planet Pluto was discovered in 1930 by Clyde Tombaugh, he relied on “gravitational calculations”. But Tombaugh was a Unitarian, a liberal religious group that supports the Theory of Gravity. The modern-day Unitarian-Universalists continue to rely on liberal notions and dismiss ideas of anti-gravity as heretical.
Tombaugh never even attempted to justify his “gravitational calculations” on the basis of Scripture, and he went on to be a founding member of the liberal Unitarian Fellowship of Las Cruces, New Mexico. The theory of gravity violates common sense in many ways. Adherents have a hard time explaining, for instance, why airplanes do not fall.
Since anti-gravity is rejected by the scientific establishment, they resort to lots of hand-waving. The theory, if taken seriously, implies that the default position for all airplanes is on the ground. While this seems true for Northwest Airlines, it appears that JetBlue and Southwest have a superior theory that effectively harnesses forces that overcome so-called gravity.
- It is unlikely that the Law of Gravity will be repealed given the present geo-political climate, but there is no need to teach unfounded theories in the public schools.
- There is, indeed, evidence that the Theory of Gravity is having a grave effect on morality.
- Activist judges and left-leaning teachers often use the phrase “what goes up must come down” as a way of describing gravity, and relativists have been quick to apply this to moral standards and common decency.
Finally, the mere name‚ “Universal Theory of Gravity” or “Theory of Universal Gravity” (the secularists like to use confusing language) has a distinctly socialist ring to it. The core idea of “to each according to his weight, from each according to his mass” is communistic.
There is no reason that gravity should apply to the just and the unjust equally, and the saved should have relief from such “universalism.” If we have Universal Gravity now, then universal health care will be sure to follow. It is this kind of universalism that saps a nation’s moral fiber. It is not even clear why we need a theory of gravity: there is not a single mention in the Bible, and the patriotic Founding Fathers never referred to it.
Overall, the Theory of Universal Gravity is just not an attractive theory. It is based on borderline evidence, has many serious gaps in what it claims to explain, is clearly wrong in important respects, and has social and moral deficiencies. If taught in the public schools, by mis-directed “educators”, it has to be balanced with alternative,more attractive theories with genuine gravamen and spiritual gravitas.