What Is The Difference Between Privacy Law And Information Systems Security How Are They Related?

What Is The Difference Between Privacy Law And Information Systems Security How Are They Related
What is information privacy? – Information privacy refers to control over individuals’ personal data, such as personally identifying information (PII) or personal health information (PHI). In the United States and many other countries, these types of personal information receive legal protections.

Consumers have the right to say how companies manage, share, and dispose of that information. Think about the privacy policy a consumer must agree to while registering for an online account or downloading a mobile phone app, for example. In the privacy policy, the company lays out what type of information it will gather from consumers, how it intends to use this data, and what other entities it can and cannot share the data with.

Information privacy sometimes, though not always, overlaps with information security because sensitive user information can also be organizational data that requires security protections. Why is information privacy important for businesses? Your company needs to ensure client data privacy for a few different reasons: Maintaining regulatory compliance: Your organization needs to provide robust information privacy protections to comply with various laws and regulations,

Your company should stay apprised of the applicable regulations governing data privacy for your operations and implement policies that comply with them, Protecting customers: Your company should also ensure data privacy to avoid harming your clients. In the worst-case scenario, a malicious actor could steal client identities and cost your customers thousands of dollars.

Keeping your clients’ data out of unauthorized hands also protects consumers from harassment and intrusions and gives them peace of mind about their private information’s safety. Boosting consumer confidence: The way you handle sensitive consumer information will also affect the public opinion of your company.

Navigating data privacy with confidence proves your reliability and trustworthiness to your clients and potential clients. It may well earn you substantial business and brand loyalty. Avoiding financial losses: Consumers generally feel the direct economic impacts of data breaches most keenly. Still, your company could take a hit as well.

Failing to comply with information privacy laws might earn your business hefty fines. A company that wishes to set up an information privacy program will need to take steps such as these:

Determine the level of privacy currently afforded through the company’s policies Research the regulatory privacy standards the business must meet Learn about the privacy protection options available Confirm that these options will work within established organizational frameworks Train employees on how to handle consumer data according to these rules and in compliance with the law Manage consumer data according to the chosen protection options

The essential difference between privacy and security is that information security focuses on data and infrastructure, while information privacy focuses on people and their protected information. Information security protects a company’s content and business objectives from threats and attacks, while information privacy respects consumer rights and keeps customer data secure.

A business organization’s privacy program protects individual clients’ personal information. On the other hand, its information security program protects all the organization’s digital assets, from data, programs, and systems to networks and infrastructure. One useful analogy for thinking about information security vs.

privacy is that of a window in your living room. Having thick, resistant glass in the window and installing heavy iron bars on the outside are security measures, These features protect you from potential intrusions. Hanging curtains over your window gives you privacy by preventing passersby in the street from seeing in.

What is the difference between privacy and information security?

Both security and privacy are important in the physical and digital worlds. Privacy is the right to control how your information is viewed and used, while security is protection against threats or danger. In the digital world, security generally refers to the unauthorized access of data, often involving protection against hackers or cyber criminals.

What is the definition of privacy as it relates to information security?

privacy – Definition(s): Assurance that the confidentiality of, and access to, certain information about an entity is protected. Source(s): NIST SP 1800-10B under Privacy from NIST SP 800-130 NIST SP 1800-25B under Privacy from NIST SP 800-130 NIST SP 1800-26B under Privacy from NIST SP 800-130 freedom from intrusion into the private life or affairs of an individual when that intrusion results from undue or illegal gathering and use of data about that individual Source(s): NISTIR 8053 from ISO/IEC 2382 The right of a party to maintain control over and confidentiality of information about itself.

What is the relationship between data privacy and data security?

Data Privacy vs. Data Security – To better understand these two ideas, let’s compare data privacy vs. data security. Data privacy is the concept of ensuring proper use of personal data by giving individuals control over how their data is accessed, used, or shared. On the other hand, data security keeps that data safe from unauthorized access.

Can you explain how privacy and security are and maybe are not connected similar concepts?

Tips for protecting your privacy and security – It’s smart to do business with companies and organizations that value your privacy and take measures to protect your personal information. But there are things you can do, too, to help protect your privacy and boost your security. Here are some examples:

Limit what you share on social media and online in general.
Shred important documents before tossing them in the trash.
Guard your Social Security number. Keep it in a secure place and don’t give it out if possible. Ask if you can provide another form of identification.
Safeguard your data and devices. This might include enlisting the help of security software, a secure router, a VPN on public Wi-Fi, and identity theft protection services.
Understand how the information you’re giving away could be used. Become more aware of how your personal information, once shared online, is no longer in your control. Read an organization’s privacy policy before signing up for an app or service.

Remember, it’s not necessarily a case of privacy vs. security. Both are important in our connected world. You can and should have both.

What is the difference between privacy and security which is harder to maintain explain?

Privacy vs. Security – The difference between privacy and security comes down to which data is being protected, how it is being protected, from whom it is being protected, and who is responsible for that protection. Security is about protecting data from malicious threats, whereas privacy is about using data responsibly.

Obviously, data security is concerned with securing sensitive data.
Where data privacy and security begin to differ is in whom or what they are protecting data from.
Data security is primarily focused on preventing unauthorized access to data, via breaches or leaks, regardless of who the unauthorized party is.

To achieve this, organizations use tools and technology, such as firewalls, user authentication, network limitations, and internal security practices to deter such access. This also includes security technologies such as tokenization and encryption to further protect data by rendering it unreadable–which, in the instance that a breach occurs, can thwart cybercriminals from potentially exposing massive volumes of sensitive data.

Privacy, however, is concerned with ensuring that the sensitive data an organization processes, stores, or transmits is ingested compliantly and with consent from the owner of that sensitive data. This means informing individuals upfront of which types of data will be collected, for what purpose, and with whom it will be shared.

Once this transparency is provided, an individual then must agree to the terms of use, allowing the organization ingesting data to use it in line with its stated purposes. So, privacy is less about protecting data from malicious threats than it is about using it responsibly and in accordance with the wishes of customers and users to prevent it from falling into the wrong hands.

But that doesn’t mean it can’t also include security-type measures to ensure privacy is protected.
For instance, efforts to prevent the linking of sensitive data to its data subject or natural person—such as de-identifying personal data, obfuscating it, or storing it in different places to reduce the likelihood of reidentification–are other common privacy provisions.

Too often, the terms security and privacy are used interchangeably, but you can see that they are, in fact, different–although sometimes difficult to distinguish between. Whereas security controls can be met without also satisfying privacy considerations, privacy concerns are impossible to address without first employing effective security practices.

What is more important between privacy and security?

If there’s a debate that sums up post-9/11 politics, it’s security versus privacy. Which is more important? How much privacy are you willing to give up for security? Can we even afford privacy in this age of insecurity? Security versus privacy: It’s the battle of the century, or at least its first decade.

In a Jan.21 New Yorker article, Director of National Intelligence Michael McConnell discusses a proposed plan to monitor all—that’s right, all —internet communications for security purposes, an idea so extreme that the word ” Orwellian ” feels too mild.
The article (now online here ) contains this passage : In order for cyberspace to be policed, internet activity will have to be closely monitored.

Ed Giorgio, who is working with McConnell on the plan, said that would mean giving the government the authority to examine the content of any e-mail, file transfer or Web search. “Google has records that could help in a cyber-investigation,” he said. Giorgio warned me, “We have a saying in this business: ‘Privacy and security are a zero-sum game.'” I’m sure they have that saying in their business.

And it’s precisely why, when people in their business are in charge of government, it becomes a police state.
If privacy and security really were a zero-sum game, we would have seen mass immigration into the former East Germany and modern-day China.
While it’s true that police states like those have less street crime, no one argues that their citizens are fundamentally more secure.

We’ve been told we have to trade off security and privacy so often—in debates on security versus privacy, writing contests, polls, reasoned essays and political rhetoric—that most of us don’t even question the fundamental dichotomy. But it’s a false one,

Security and privacy are not opposite ends of a seesaw; you don’t have to accept less of one to get more of the other. Think of a door lock, a burglar alarm and a tall fence. Think of guns, anti-counterfeiting measures on currency and that dumb liquid ban at airports. Security affects privacy only when it’s based on identity, and there are limitations to that sort of approach,

Since 9/11, approximately three things have potentially improved airline security: reinforcing the cockpit doors, passengers realizing they have to fight back and—possibly—sky marshals. Everything else—all the security measures that affect privacy—is just security theater and a waste of effort,

By the same token, many of the anti-privacy “security” measures we’re seeing— national ID cards, warrantless eavesdropping, massive data mining and so on—do little to improve, and in some cases harm, security.
And government claims of their success are either wrong, or against fake threats,
The debate isn’t security versus privacy.

It’s liberty versus control. You can see it in comments by government officials : “Privacy no longer can mean anonymity,” says Donald Kerr, principal deputy director of national intelligence. “Instead, it should mean that government and businesses properly safeguard people’s private communications and financial information.” Did you catch that? You’re expected to give up control of your privacy to others, who—presumably—get to decide how much of it you deserve.

That’s what loss of liberty looks like. It should be no surprise that people choose security over privacy: 51 to 29 percent in a recent poll, Even if you don’t subscribe to Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, it’s obvious that security is more important. Security is vital to survival, not just of people but of every living thing.

Privacy is unique to humans, but it’s a social need. It’s vital to personal dignity, to family life, to society —to what makes us uniquely human—but not to survival. If you set up the false dichotomy, of course people will choose security over privacy—especially if you scare them first.

But it’s still a false dichotomy. There is no security without privacy. And liberty requires both security and privacy. The famous quote attributed to Benjamin Franklin reads: “Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” It’s also true that those who would give up privacy for security are likely to end up with neither.

This essay originally appeared on Wired.com. Tags: air travel, control, essays, intelligence, Internet, national security policy, physical security, privacy, security theater, surveillance, terrorism Posted on January 29, 2008 at 5:21 AM • 99 Comments Sidebar photo of Bruce Schneier by Joe MacInnis.

What is the definition of privacy as it relates to information security How is this definition of privacy different from the everyday definition?

Privacy in terms of InfoSec is about information that is collected, used and stored by an organisation should be used only for the purpose stated by the data owner at the time it was collected. The everyday definition is that privacy does mean freedom from observation.

Why is privacy law important?

#6. Privacy rights ensure we have control over our data – If it’s your data, you should have control over it. Privacy rights dictate that your data can only be used in ways you agree to and that you can access any information about yourself. If you didn’t have this control, you would feel helpless.

What is the difference between data privacy and cyber security?

What is Data Privacy? – Data privacy and cybersecurity are significantly intertwined, however, there are distinct differences between the two. The core difference is that data privacy focuses on ensuring a user’s information is properly handled, while cybersecurity focuses on preventing security breaches.

Data privacy can be defined as the proper handling of sensitive user data.
Data privacy consists of whether the data is encrypted at rest and in transit.
The decision of when and how data will be shared with a third party is the realm of data privacy.
Lastly it ensures the user’s data collection, storage, and usage adheres to all regulatory standards such as GDPR, CCPA, or HIPAA.

Let’s take a look at a couple ways an organization can ensure the privacy of their users’ data.

Is there a link between cyber security and protection of privacy?

Privacy and Cyber SecurityEmphasizing privacy protection in cyber security activities Report prepared by the Research Group, Legal Services, Policy and Research December 2014 This research report examines the common interests and tensions between privacy and cyber security.

It explores how challenges for cyber security are also challenges for privacy and data protection, considers how cyber security policy can affect privacy, and notes how cyberspace governance and security is a global issue.
Finally, it sets out key policy directions with a view to generating dialogue on cyber security as an important element of online privacy protection.

As “cyberspace” has become central to the global information and communication infrastructure, the security of cyberspace has now become a more urgent priority for corporations and governments around the world. In fact, the Digital Canada 150 strategy, launched in April 2014, complements Canada’s cyber security strategy by making Protecting Canadians one of its five pillars.

According to the 2010 document Canada’s Cyber Security Strategy (the “Strategy”), cyberspace is “the electronic world created by interconnected networks of information technology and the information on those networks.
It is a global commons where more than 1.7 billion people are linked together to exchange ideas, services and friendship.” The term “cyber security,” though not defined in the Strategy, is generally understood to encompass any measures taken to protect online information and secure the infrastructure on which it resides.

Technologies that are ubiquitous, interconnected, and allow easy access to the Internet have become deeply integrated in everyday life. As a result, we increasingly depend on cyberspace for social, economic and political interactions. The web provides a platform for a whole range of critical infrastructure sectors and services, such as health care, food and water, finance, information and communication technology, public safety, energy and utilities, manufacturing, transportation and government.

Cyberspace connectivity augments all of these critical infrastructure sectors and is therefore vital to Canada’s future economic growth. At the same time, the online environment has increasingly been subjected to sophisticated and targeted threats; our ever-increasing reliance on cyberspace is creating new and significant vulnerabilities.

This risk is magnified by a number of factors: more valuable electronic data is being stored and processed on a massive scale, much of it in the cloud; powerful and portable computing devices such as smartphones, tablets and laptops are increasingly integrated into every aspect of our lives; information is shared, combined and linked with other information with greater frequency; and third-party relationships (e.g.: outsourcing to a cloud provider) are the norm.

Unless all components are equally secure, the entire system is vulnerable as cyber criminals are often skilled at exploiting weaknesses in cyberspace.
For example, in 2011, Canada suffered a significant security breach when the computer systems of three key federal government departments were penetrated.

Although no personal information was known to have been compromised in the attack, the hackers were able to steal highly sensitive documents and force the departments offline for months. In 2012, the Auditor General of Canada observed that the Government’s response to the 2011 breach revealed that systems were clearly vulnerable and good information security practices were not being consistently followed.

The Auditor General also commented that implementation of the Strategy had been slow to date, leaving the nation’s capacity to secure cyberspace extremely underdeveloped.
More recently, in 2014 much of the cyber world had to deal with “Heartbleed”, a security bug which revealed a vulnerability in commonly-used encryption.

This bug opened the door to possible compromise of usernames, passwords and other sensitive content from a variety of websites, including popular social media sites, web-based e-mail providers and a number of e-commerce sites. In addition, the recent malware “Blackshade” allowed for the capture of information on a victim’s computer, including keystrokes, photographs, documents and passwords to access online accounts.

These events were sobering reminders of the fragility of the Internet, and reinforced the importance of cyber security. The Action Plan 2010-2015 for Canada’s Cyber Security Strategy (the ” Action Plan “), released in April 2013, outlined the progress to date as well as the Government’s ongoing plans to implement the Strategy which has been augmented by the April 2014 release of Digital Canada 150, focusing on five pillars: connecting Canadians, protecting Canadians, economic opportunities, digital government and Canadian content.

Since 2010, the Government of Canada has structured its Strategy and Action Plan around three pillars: 1) securing federal government systems, 2) partnering to safeguard vital cyber systems outside the federal government and 3) helping Canadians to be secure online.

The public awareness component of the Strategy has received the highest profile to date. Since its launch, the Government of Canada has made public awareness and outreach efforts a priority, informing Canadians about ways to protect and safeguard their personal information in the digital sphere. For example, as the private sector carries significant responsibility for cyber security, much of the information generated and stored in cyberspace is not within the control of individual users, but rather is in the hands of many private sector and third party providers.

Given that the private sector is also largely responsible for the critical infrastructures in Canada, the second pillar of the Strategy and Action Plan recognizes that many of the risks and impacts of cyber incidents are shared between public and private sectors.

Privacy protection and cyber security should be thought of as interconnected: as more and more personal information is processed or stored online, privacy protection increasingly relies on effective cyber security implementation by organizations to secure personal data both when it is in transit and at rest.

In some cases, cyber security measures underpin critical infrastructure that protects data, thereby safeguarding personal information. However, as with many security measures, certain cyber security efforts can also threaten privacy; the relationship between cyber security and privacy is not a completely harmonious one.

Cyber security activities can require up-to-the-second monitoring of activities on a network in order to detect anomalies and threats, and in some cases, monitoring of this nature could involve capture and analysis of massive amounts of personal information. A report from the World Economic Forum released in January 2014 examines the need for new approaches to increase resilience against cyber attacks and suggests that the failure to effectively secure cyberspace could result in an aggregate impact of approximately US$ 3 trillion by 2020.

However, many of the challenges for cyber security are also challenges for privacy and data protection. Cyber security is by no means a static issue with a permanent solution. Threats to information in cyberspace evolve quickly and, more recently, have expanded into new channels such as social media and mobile technologies.

As organizations strive to keep pace with the changing landscape created by innovative technologies, social practices and ever-changing threats, data produced, collected and collated on a massive scale can be left vulnerable to those cyber threats. The following are some of the emerging challenges for data protection and cyber security.

The continuing evolution of cyberspace, as a fully electronic world created by interconnected networks in parallel with our physical environment, is characterized by an enormous amount of data. The modern economy increasingly depends on vast quantities of digital data that are generated through financial transactions, communications, entertainment, travel, shopping, online browsing, and hundreds of other routine activities.

Data elements are continually being combined, connected, compared and linked to other information as organizations try to capitalize on its value and to offer new and improved services to their users. The electronic systems and digital networks that facilitate these transactions and communications also capture our preferences and other personal details, and track our online and, increasingly, physical movements.

The volume of data generated in cyberspace can only increase exponentially once the “Internet of things” becomes a reality, and sensors within devices autonomously report on location, status, surrounding environment, provide real-time updates or help monitor and control devices remotely.

Cyberspace has become inherently complex to manage and challenging to secure. Increased, persistent connectivity through a greater range of mobile devices and “always on” services, third-party business relationships, cloud computing infrastructures, information sharing agreements, and other “seamless” or automated business processes in cyberspace continue to pose shared risks to cyber security and privacy.

Threats in cyberspace will continue to target the weakest links in any complex web of business relationships or government processes, meaning stakeholders in cyber security efforts have a shared role in protecting the infrastructure and the information that flows through it.

Online threats may be invisible but their effects are very real, and interconnected systems that are globally accessible are inherently vulnerable. As the scale of information flowing through cyberspace has expanded, so too has its value to corporations, government, and those with malicious intent. Our data trails now leave a larger footprint across cyberspace, leaving us more exposed to threats.

Wherever there is an opportunity to profit there is usually a market for criminal activity, but as Gabriella Coleman notes, there has also been a “professionalization” of hacking and cyber-crime, making these activities much more sophisticated. State-sponsored threats, conducted or condoned by a nation state, are also becoming increasingly common.

These are sometimes referred to as Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs) and are usually well educated, well resourced adversaries who focus on the theft of secrets including intellectual property.
Ronald Deibert, Director of the Canada Centre for Global Security Studies and the Citizen Lab at the Munk School of Global Affairs, University of Toronto, explains that cyber-crime is growing in frequency and complexity for several reasons: “First, the number of users coming online, including individuals, businesses, organizations, and governments is growing rapidly, creating a growing baseline of potential targets.

Second, the ways in which we communicate and share information online has changed fundamentally over the last several years, with the growth of social networking, cloud computing and mobile forms of connectivity. We share more data with each other, entrust it to third parties outside our immediate control, and click on links and documents over social networking platforms and services with a greater degree of frequency.” Third, he argues that because companies rarely disclose security breaches to the public for competitive and reputational reasons, there is limited information about how attacks are carried out, which could ultimately hinder cyber security efforts.

In the next three years, the number of cellphones in use will exceed the global population.
Our mobile devices can contain a goldmine of personal information.
People routinely carry their mobile devices everywhere and use them for almost anything imaginable; people communicate with friends, access email, take photos and video and upload it to the web, play games, track distances, locate nearby stores and restaurants, find directions to specific locations, access their bank accounts, surf the web, monitor their health/physical activity, keep track of appointments or log to-do lists.

Organizations are all striving to reach consumers and clients on the devices they use every day, but alongside all of these conveniences for the consumer is the possibility for new vulnerabilities or opportunities for cyber threats. The International Cyber Security Protection Alliance (ICSPA) recently released a cyber-crime study that highlighted mobile communications and cloud services as today’s new targets for the cyber-criminal.

The study notes that one of the significant concerns facing the mobile industry is how to address the skyrocketing amount of malware on mobile devices.
Malware can easily be distributed to mobile devices through malicious apps within smartphone app stores which appear safe.
Furthermore, the use of free public Wi-Fi can also put mobile devices at increased risk of having data intercepted.

Malware can target mobile devices used for near-field communications transactions and compromise “tap-and-pay” functionality. ICSPA’s study concludes that mobile malware is a key emerging threat in cyberspace. Although it has been argued that cyber criminals are building better malware specifically designed for mobile devices, actual infection rates on devices are low, for the present, since the distribution of malware to mobile devices has not yet been perfected.

This can be expected to change in the near future.
As cyber threats increasingly target mobile devices, data protection becomes all the more critical.
Communications and transactions using mobile devices are more closely tied with individual users, sensors within mobile devices can be enabled to locate devices with a high degree of precision, and features built into the devices or apps that people download can track, record and store personal information, upload contact lists, communications and transactions.

Faced with these mounting risks, the mobile industry, companies and app developers have a heightened responsibility to ensure the safety of the platforms and the backend systems, where so much personal information is collected, handled and stored. “Big data” can be defined as vast stores of information gathered from both traditional sources and, increasingly, new collection points (e.g.

Web data, sensor data, text data, time and location data gleaned from social networks).
The insights derived through analysis of big data are often touted as the solution to almost any problem or issue.
However, this data-driven approach raises two distinct issues from a cyber security perspective: how to secure information in a big data context and the use of new data analytics to sift through network information including personal information, in order to predict security incidents.

In the same way that data (“big” or not) is considered a valuable commercial asset, it is also likely to be valuable to cyber attackers. Security breaches will have a potentially serious impact upon “big data” providers, as the use of big data is fairly new to most organizations and the vulnerabilities and risks may not be well understood.

Organizations that decide to use big data analytics may introduce new potential security vulnerabilities, or opportunities for malicious data input. An additional concern is that “big data” begets “bigger data”; as the capabilities to collect data increase, so does the temptation to do so. Proponents of big data analysis have claimed that it could play a key role in helping detect cyber threats at an early stage by using sophisticated pattern analysis and combining and analyzing multiple data sources.

Moreover, big data has been touted as a crucial problem-solving tool, capable of improving public safety and security, saving energy and improving healthcare. On the other hand, the inherent complexities of those same multiple data points and integration across platforms will also bring more complexity in the safeguards required to protect the information.

Certainly, evidence exists which shows privacy concerns arise by virtue of the fact that big data analytics quite often means unrestricted collection of data, and sophisticated analysis that can yield very personal insights about individuals.
This is also a process that could potentially motivate secondary uses of personal information that are unreasonable.

Peter Wood, Chief Executive Officer of First Base Technologies LLP and a member of the ISACA London Chapter Security Advisory Group, explains that the crux of the issue is that big data’s volume and velocity “expands the boundaries of existing information security responsibilities and introduces significant new risks and challenges.” In recent years, reports of privacy breaches have become increasingly common, with potentially significant consequences for affected individuals.

Many of the risks and impacts of cyber incidents are shared between governments and the private sector, but it is most often the private sector that is on the front line in confronting these threats, given that they control the vast majority of the telecommunications infrastructure.
Several recent reports have indicated that a large number of businesses are unprepared for, and indifferent to, cyber threats, and lack proper contingency plans.

Cyber security issues have plagued Canadian companies in recent years. ICSPA’s study of the impact of cyber-crime found considerable gaps in Canadian businesses’ preparedness against cyber-crime overall, but stated that generally, large businesses may be better prepared to deal with shifting threats, which are very real, and in constant evolution.

The main cyber-crime threats (as perceived by the businesses who responded to the survey) include malware and virus attacks, sabotage of data or networks, financial fraud, phishing/social engineering, theft of laptops/devices, unauthorized access or misuse of website, misuse of social networks by employees, denial of service, telecommunications fraud, and Advanced Persistent Threats.

The study revealed that most Canadian businesses that responded (69%) had no procedure in place to follow when cyber-crime is identified, and only 22% reported that they employ a risk assessment process to identify where they were most vulnerable. This is concerning given that the survey revealed the prevalence of cyber-crime among Canadian businesses, with 69% reporting some kind of attack within a twelve month period.

At the same time as organizations appear to be unprepared for cyber threats and breaches, individuals are expressing their desire to know if and when they may be affected by a breach. The OPC’s 2013 survey of Canadians found respondents were uncertain whether they would be notified if the personal information they have given an organization was lost, stolen or unintentionally exposed: 59% thought it unlikely; 41% thought it probable.

However, virtually all Canadians (97%) who responded said they would want to be notified, which seems to indicate they would support improvements in how organizations treat information security and breach response. In a business survey commissioned by the OPC in 2014, 58% of respondent businesses indicated that they do not have guidelines in place in the event that personal information of their customers has been breached.

Lack of organizational preparedness and low valuation of impact would appear to suggest that breach preparedness has not yet become a business priority.
Organizations are required to comply with various laws and regulations in order to operate in particular jurisdictions or across various jurisdictions.

When it comes to security, however, a mechanical approach to compliance does not necessarily mean that the organization is secure. In fact, blindly pursuing compliance may actually put an organization at increased risk specifically because it is focused on a “check-the-box” compliance model leading to a false sense of security, whereas performing proper risk management requires organizations to scour and identify areas where additional safeguards are needed.

A risk management approach naturally complements compliance obligations.
The challenge for organizations is to understand that security is not simply a matter of meeting minimal compliance standards, but rather, a question of engaging in effective risk management and dynamic implementation of security.

Cyber security is an incredibly complex and changing policy issue. No country, organization or individual is ever completely immune to cyber risks, and approaches to protecting against cyber threats can vary greatly depending on the values and decisions that underlie cyber security activities.

In fact, the issue of cyber security involves much broader issues of internet governance. Two divergent views of cyber security regulation have emerged: one favours a harmonized approach to governance which protects openness, privacy and interoperability across regions – the “open commons” approach. The other advocates stronger governmental control and regulatory landscape – the “gated community” approach.

It has been argued that cyber security is more than a technical issue because it pertains to the security of an entire communications ecosystem. In that regard, while cyber security will inevitably require some technical developments, it will also require the development of social norms, global collaboration, and a regulatory framework that includes multiple stakeholders.

As stakeholders consider cyber security policy directions, it will be essential to ensure that the dialogue around cyber security includes the acknowledgement of its link to data protection, trust, and privacy. The following section will consider cyber security policy developments and foreign policy considerations.

As cyber security policy is developed at a national level, there is a risk that national security and public safety objectives could take a predominant role in formulating responses to cyber threats, at the expense of privacy protection. In this manifestation, cyber security policy could enable what Deibert describes as the ” securitization of cyberspace – a transformation of the domain into a matter of national security.” In an era when national security is so often used to justify extraordinary intrusions on individual privacy, it will be vital to ensure that cyber security strategies and activities do not endorse building massive surveillance regimes for unlimited and unending monitoring and analysis of the personal information of individuals.

Cyber security efforts should not expand surveillance to the detriment of individuals’ privacy, civil liberties or other democratically held values.” Governments must build in the necessary checks and controls to reflect the privacy norms we ascribe to as a society. As an alternative, Deibert presents an argument for a stewardship approach to cyber security, where “governments, NGOs, armed forces, law enforcement and intelligence agencies, private sector companies, programmers, technologists, and average users must all play vital and interdependent roles as stewards of cyberspace.” The concept of stewardship in cyber security acknowledges that cyberspace belongs to no one in particular, but that everybody has an influential role to play in shaping its foundation and a stake in its evolution.

This alternative approach recognizes that cyber security is a shared responsibility because of the ways in which cyberspace is interconnected and interdependent, and the role all organizations have to play to ensure that their actions do not introduce security risks into cyberspace in general, or fail to uphold privacy principles.

A stewardship approach also calls for accountability on all of the stakeholders involved in cyber security: “Securing cyberspace requires a reinforcement, rather than a relaxation, of restraint on power, including checks and balances on governments, law enforcement, intelligence agencies, and on the private sector.” As holders of vast amounts of personal information, it is logical to expect that the private sector assume some responsibilities to protect the infrastructure of cyberspace and the personal information that flows through it.

Both approaches, built-in government controls and the broader stewardship model, have their merits and may, in fact, be complementary. Given that information flowing through cyberspace is not constrained by national borders, “with whom we share data and where it ultimately resides in cyberspace is an inherently international concern.” As such, citizens of every country face similar risks in the protection of their privacy rights.

Issues of cyber security and privacy protection are global challenges that require a global response.
The Action Plan called on the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada (DFATD) to develop a foreign cyber policy that ensures that activities in cyberspace are aligned with broader foreign policy, international trade and security objectives.

International groups such as the G8, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), and Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) are developing principles in support of the right to cyberspace access, openness, freedom of expression and user privacy.

However, these very principles can be odds with domestic national security or public safety objectives, and also with suppliers, who create cyber security products with built-in capabilities to track users, monitor network traffic, and filter content.
As cyber security policy directions develop, privacy and data protection authorities have a role to play to reinforce privacy values to ensure that cyber security policy respects privacy rights, and prioritizes personal information protection.

As one such data protection authority, the OPC is perceived as a key player engaged in shaping international cyberspace governance due to the Office’s efforts to ensure that online service offerings from international companies uphold Canadians’ right to privacy in accordance with Canadian standards for privacy protection.

International co-operation in the areas of cyber security and privacy protection will continue to be essential to address the transborder and cross-organizational challenges for cyber security and data protection.
In 2013, Peter Hustinx, then European Data Protection Supervisor, acknowledged that cyber security issues have to be addressed at an international level through international standards and cooperation.

Hustinx also commented that “while measures to ensure cyber security may require the analysis of some personal information of individuals, for instance IP addresses that can be traced back to specific individuals, cyber security can play a fundamental role in ensuring the protection of privacy and data protection rights in the online environment, provided the processing of this data is proportionate, necessary and lawful.” As individuals grow more dependent on and connected to the cyberspace, they will become more reliant on organizations’ effective implementation of cyber security and sensitivity to privacy.

The following are some of the key areas in which an increased emphasis on privacy protection could help support, advance and augment cyber security activities. We know that certain degrees of monitoring, logging, data mining or surveillance will create tensions or conflicting requirements between privacy and cyber security efforts.

As Canada’s Interim Privacy Commissioner stated in 2011, “violating people’s privacy in the interest of ensuring cyber security would defeat the very purpose of cyber security.” While cyber security activities may require some degree of monitoring in order to be able to detect anomalies and protect cyber infrastructure and information, cyber security strategies and activities should not be an excuse for building massive surveillance regimes for unfettered monitoring and analysis of the personal information of individuals.

Privacy regulators and advocates have a role to play to ensure that cyber security strategies, principles, action plans and implementation activities promote privacy protection both as a guiding principle and an enduring standard. In its 2013-2014 Report on Plans and Priorities, the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada (DFATD) committed to establishing a cyber security foreign policy to promote Canada’s Internet-related economic, security and foreign policy interests.

This priority stems directly from the Action Plan and is part of the Government’s overall plan to implementing the Strategy as launched in 2010. DFATD has foreign policy responsibilities for coordinating Canada’s participation in international undertakings to support cyber security initiatives, including the Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime, of which Canada is a signatory.

There are clear advantages to building cyber security into programs and activities from the start rather than retroactively mitigating cyber risks after the fact.
Undertaking preventative measures to ensure security – and informing consumers of the potential risks and how they have been mitigated – can foster trust in individuals using the internet.

The private sector carries a significant responsibility for cyber security because it controls so much of the infrastructure and information in cyberspace. The volume and range of personal information that organizations collect make it a valuable asset for organizations, but also a valuable asset for bad actors.

In the competitive rush to innovate and develop new technologies, services and applications, organizations may not be doing enough to adequately assess cyber risk. Too often personal information is treated like a commodity, and is monitored, aggregated, collected, used, disclosed and retained with little regard for the impacts on privacy.

Too many organizations leave themselves vulnerable to breaches either through a lack of preparation or an undervaluation of impact, and all too frequently seem to accept data loss as a cost of doing business. The Action Plan commits to improving legislative tools to protect Canadians in cyberspace.

This legislative promise includes Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL) which came into force in July 2014, and the data breach notification requirements contained in Bill S-4, the Digital Privacy Act, introduced April 2014. The private sector is unquestionably faced with complex and significant challenges in protecting cyberspace.

The web of business relationships, persistent connectivity, and greater range of devices and channels makes cyberspace inherently complex and challenging to secure. Still, as stewards of massive amounts of personal information, the private sector has a responsibility and shared role in protecting the infrastructure of cyberspace and the personal information that flows through it.

There is no simple solution to the persistent and ever-changing threats to privacy in cyberspace. Any legislative solutions need to be carefully considered to ensure they are balanced and that there is accountability for personal information protection. Practical cyber security implementation should involve identifying personal information as a critical asset in need of protection, identifying the vulnerabilities that put personal information at risk, and implementing safeguards to protect against the risks identified without in turn impeding on privacy rights or other values such as openness and freedom of expression.

Generating dialogue with the private sector on the vital components of cyber security implementation may uncover areas in their cyber risk assessments and privacy safeguards that still need to be strengthened. The complexities of cyberspace and the mounting sophistication of threats necessitate that organizations do more about privacy protection, particularly with respect to cyber security efforts.

Security safeguards are a key element of the ability to protect personal information and preserve privacy in cyberspace, with technical safeguards being only one aspect of an overall risk management approach to cyber security and personal information protection.
It is no longer enough to simply be compliant with privacy requirements or technical safeguards to the minimum extent possible.

Protection of personal information requires giving effect to all privacy principles, and practicing privacy compliance throughout the lifespan of the information, including: demonstrating accountability, being transparent, practicing data minimization, ensuring appropriate use and disclosure, implementing effective access controls, and abiding by reasonable retention periods and safe destruction methods.

Equally, the interconnectivity and shared risks in cyberspace puts responsibility on all stakeholders to shape cyberspace and cyber security on a foundation of enduring trust. Cyber security efforts will require global collaboration and a stewardship approach that ensures there is accountability and checks and balances on all stakeholders involved in cyber security activities.

Privacy regulators have a role to play in this broader dialogue about global stewardship to ensure that cyber security efforts are based on a balanced and proportional risk management approach that effectively protects personal information and respects privacy rights.

Footnote 1 Deibert, Ron. Prepared for the Canadian Defence & Foreign Affairs Institute, August 2012. Footnote 2 See the Government of Canada’s (2014) Footnote 3 (2010) Footnote 4 There is no commonly recognized definition for cyber security. ISO/IEC 27032/2012 defines cyber security as the “preservation of confidentiality, integrity and availability of information in the Cyberspace.” Footnote 5 See,

Footnote 6 ‘ Canada and Cyberspace: Key Issues and Challenges ‘ (2012) a report prepared by The SecDev Group, commissioned by the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada (DFAIT). Footnote 7 This is acknowledged in the, Released April 2013.

Footnote 8 The departments affected were Department of Finance, Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, and Defense Research and Development Canada.
This reference comes from ‘ Canada and Cyberspace: Key Issues and Challenges ‘ (2012) a report prepared by The SecDev Group, commissioned by the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada (DFAIT).

Footnote 9 ‘ Canada and Cyberspace: Key Issues and Challenges ‘ (2012) a report prepared by The SecDev Group, commissioned by the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada (DFAIT). Footnote 10 Fall Report of the Office of the Auditor General (2012),,

Footnote 11 See Fall Report of the Office of the Auditor General (2012), and ‘ Canada and Cyberspace: Key Issues and Challenges ‘ (2012) a report prepared by The SecDev Group, commissioned by the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada (DFAIT). Footnote 12, Footnote 13 Government of Canada’s (2014) at http://www.digitaleconomy.gc.ca Footnote 14 Footnote 15 The OPC has already been involved in projects that helped to raise awareness among Canadian citizens and small businesses across Canada about cyber security and its importance to personal information protection.

In 2010, the OPC launched the designed to help SMEs build customized privacy plans. In 2011, the OPC developed an article series offering cyber security advice and tips for small business. The OPC also worked collaboratively with Public Safety to review the section of its Cybersafe web site providing information to individuals on how to protect themselves.

See: GetCyberSafe.gc.ca. Also related is, and Fact Sheets on protecting personal information on mobile devices: and, Footnote 16 See, “So what is critical infrastructure anyways?” Footnote 17 OPC Speech: (February 23, 2011) Footnote 18 World Economic Forum report on, released January 20, 2014. Footnote 19 Center for Applied Cybersecurity Research, Indiana University.

Roundtable on Cyber Threats, Objectives, and Responses: A Report, December 2012. Footnote 20, Julie Bort, Published March 29, 2013. Accessed online October 7, 2013 Footnote 21, Footnote 22 “Hacking” is the commonly used term, however the technically correct term is “cracking” – a shortened form of “criminal hacking”.

Hacking, in the original sense of the word, is figuring out how things work. Where the term “hacking” is used throughout the paper, it is meant to refer to criminal hacking activities, aka “cracking”. For more on hacking, see the work of Gabriella Coleman; in particular, or, Footnote 23 Google Big Tent Canada 2013, Google Demonstration: Cyber security in Action,

May 30, 2013. Footnote 24 Ibid. Footnote 25 ‘Study of the Impact of Cyber Crime on Businesses in Canada.’ International Cyber Security Protection Alliance (May 2013) p.33. Footnote 26 Deibert, Ron. Prepared for the Canadian Defence & Foreign Affairs Institute, August 2012.

Page 11-12.
Footnote 27 Ibid.
Footnote 28 ‘ Canada and Cyberspace: Key Issues and Challenges ‘ (2012) a report prepared by The SecDev Group, commissioned by the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada (DFAIT).
Footnote 29 Study of the Impact of Cyber Crime on Businesses in Canada.’ International Cyber Security Protection Alliance (May 2013) The study was sponsored by Above Security, Blackberry, Lockheed Martin and McAfee.

Footnote 30 ‘Study of the Impact of Cyber Crime on Businesses in Canada.’ International Cyber Security Protection Alliance (May 2013) page 28. Footnote 31 Ibid, page 36. Footnote 32, McAfee Labs. Footnote 33 This argument is based on the view that most Android malware is found hidden in apps sold or given away for free in online stores other than the official Google Play store, which scans for malicious code.

See, by Antone Gonsalves, published August 16, 2013. Accessed online October 4, 2013. Footnote 34 “Big Data and Analytics: Seeking Foundations for Effective Privacy Guidance,” Centre for Information Policy Leadership, February 2013. Footnote 35 “Why Data Analytics is the Future of Everything,” Bloomberg TV, November 21, 2013.

Google Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt and Civis Analytics Chief Executive Officer Dan Wagner discuss the way big data can change everything from corporate strategy to the way people vote. They spoke with, Footnote 36 Peter Wood. “,” Computer Weekly, March 4, 2013.

Accessed online September 5, 2013.
Footnote 37 Ibid.
Footnote 38 There are a multitude of products available, see for example and,
Footnote 39 See “” Forbes, December 2013 Footnote 40 Michael Bendewald,, FacilitiesNet, April 2013; Footnote 41 Rebecca Walberg,, Financial Post, February 2014 Footnote 42 Peter Wood.

“How to tackle big data from a security point of view,” Computer Weekly, March 4, 2013. Accessed online September 5, 2013 at http://www.computerweekly.com/feature/How-to-tackle-big-data-from-a-security-point-of-view Footnote 43 Deibert, Ron. Prepared for the Canadian Defence & Foreign Affairs Institute, August 2012.

Footnote 44 See, for example, Symantec “New Survey Shows U.S. Small Business Owners Not Concerned About Cybersecurity; Majority Have No Policies or Contingency Plans” (Oct 2012); “Canadian businesses unprepared for cyber attacks: Queen’s University expert” (May 2013); Computerworld.au “” (February 2013); CBC “” (July 2013).

Footnote 45 This has been noted in several sources including: Deibert, Ron. ; Misha Glenny “Canada’s weakling Web defences” Globe and Mail, May 18, 2011; Fall Report of the Office of the Auditor General (2012), ; Alexandra Posadzki “” The Canadian Press, July 14, 2013.

Matthew Braga “” Financial Post, February 19, 2013. Footnote 46 ‘Study of the Impact of Cyber Crime on Businesses in Canada.’ International Cyber Security Protection Alliance (May 2013) Footnote 47 Ibid. Footnote 48 Ibid. Footnote 49, Prepared for the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada by Phoenix Strategic Perspectives Inc.2013.

Footnote 50 Survey of Canadians on Privacy Related Issues. Prepared for the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada by Phoenix Strategic Perspectives Inc.2014. Footnote 51 Info Security “,” published August 8, 2013. Footnote 52 Ibid. Footnote 53 Ibid.

Footnote 54 Deibert, Ron. ‘Canada and the Challenges of Cyberspace Governance.’ University of Calgary School of Public Policy (SPP) Communique. Vol 5, Issue 3, March 2013. Footnote 55 ‘ Canada and Cyberspace: Key Issues and Challenges ‘ (2012) a report prepared by The SecDev Group, commissioned by the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada (DFAIT).

Footnote 56 See Deibert, Ron. ‘Canada and the Challenges of Cyberspace Governance.’ University of Calgary School of Public Policy (SPP) Communique. Vol 5, Issue 3, March 2013. Footnote 57 Concepts from Deibert, R. & Rohozinski, R; “Risking Security: Policies and Paradoxes of Cyberspace Security,” International Political Sociology (2010), as quoted in Deibert, Ron.

August 2012, and Deibert, Ronald J.
2013) Black Code: Inside the Battle for Cyberspace,
McClelland & Stewart.
Footnote 58 Dupont, Benoit “The proliferation of cyber security strategies and their implications for privacy.”,
Arim Benyekhlef and Esther Mijans (eds.) Les Éditions Thémis.
Page 67-80, 2013.

Accessed online June 17, 2013. Footnote 59 Deibert, R. & Rohozinski, R; “Risking Security: Policies and Paradoxes of Cyberspace Security,” International Political Sociology (2010), as quoted in Deibert, Ron. August 2012. Footnote 60 Deibert, Ronald J. (2013) Black Code: Inside the Battle for Cyberspace,

McClelland & Stewart.
Footnote 61 Ibid.
Footnote 62 Ibid.
Footnote 63 Ibid.
Footnote 64 ISO/IEC 27032:2012(E) (published 16 July 2012) Footnote 65 Deibert, Ronald J.
2013) Black Code: Inside the Battle for Cyberspace,
McClelland & Stewart.
Footnote 66 Deibert, Ron.
Prepared for the Canadian Defence & Foreign Affairs Institute, August 2012.

Footnote 67, Released April 2013. Footnote 68 See page 35 in ‘ Canada and Cyberspace: Key Issues and Challenges’ (2012) a report prepared by The SecDev Group, commissioned by the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada (DFAIT). Suppliers in the US, Canada and Europe are the main producers of tools that enable deep packet inspection, content filtering, social network mining, cellphone tracking, and computer network attacks.

Footnote 69 See page 6 in ‘ Canada and Cyberspace: Key Issues and Challenges’ (2012) a report prepared by The SecDev Group, commissioned by the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada (DFAIT).
Footnote 70 Address by Chantal Bernier, “.” Remarks to the Centre for National Security organized by the Conference Board of Canada.

Footnote 71, Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Joint Communication of the Commission and of the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on a ‘Cyber Security Strategy of the European Union: an Open, Safe and Secure Cyberspace,’ and on the Commission proposal for a Directive concerning measures to ensure a high common level of network and information security across the Union.

Brussels, June 17, 2013. Footnote 72 EUROPA News Release: “.” June 17, 2013. Footnote 73 Address by Chantal Bernier, “.” Remarks at a Conference entitled “Securing the Cyber Commons: A Global Dialogue”, organized by the Canada Centre for Global Security Studies, the Munk School of Global Affairs, the University of Toronto and the SecDev Group (March 28, 2011).

Footnote 74 Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada (DFATD), Footnote 75 Also known as the Budapest Convention, this document is the only binding international instrument designed specifically to combat cybercrime. The Budapest Convention serves as a,

Can privacy and security be mutually conflicting?

In a time when people are used to waiving their right to privacy in exchange for access to exclusive services, users have become conditioned to believe that their privacy is a secondary concern to security. However, this couldn’t be further from the truth.

Contrary to what some service solutions providers may tell you, privacy and security are not mutually exclusive and each should be treated with the utmost consideration. Even though companies like Google have announced that they will no longer read your email for targeted marketing purposes, that doesn’t mean that hundreds of third-party software developers have also stopped doing so.

To help prevent phishing attacks, most email security solutions tend to treat privacy and security as separate concerns. This approach is not only misguided but also highly ineffective.

How important is security and privacy of information and data?

Data protection is important, since it prevents the information of an organization from fraudulent activities, hacking, phishing, and identity theft. Any organization that wants to work effectively need to ensure the safety of their information by implementing a data protection plan.

As the amount of data stored and created increases, so does the importance of data protection.
Data breaches and cyberattacks can cause devastating damages.
Organizations need to proactively protect their data and regularly update their protective measures.
Ultimately, the key principle and importance of data protection is safeguarding and protecting data from different threats and under different circumstances.

The following article elaborates more on data protection and its importance,

What is the difference between private and security?

What is the difference between Privacy and Security? Privacy − Privacy can be represented as an individual or a group’s ability to cloister the information about them and then disclose it selectively. It define that privacy is used to sensitive or crucial information.

The privacy domain overlaps accurately with security that can add the concepts of proper use and protection of information.
The term of global specific privacy is a current concept mainly related to Western culture (North American and British in particular) and remained unknown virtually inside a few cultures.

Most cultures recognize the ability of persons to withhold some element of personal information through broader society. In the organizational world, an individual can volunteer secret element to receive some sorts of profit. Public figures can be subject to regulations and rules on its interest.

Secret information of a person that is sent voluntarily and misused can subsequently generate identity theft.
Security − Security define personal freedom from outside forces.
It is the state of being free from potential threats or dangers.
It is like a home security system which secure the integrity of the household, data security protects of valuable data and information from prying eyes by safeguarding the passwords and documents.

The goals of security are confidentiality, integrity, and availability. It can strengthen the internal control and restrict unauthorized access from both internal and external factors, thereby securing the confidentiality and integrity of resources and assets.


Privacy	Security
Privacy defines the ability to secure personally identifiable data.	Security define protecting against unauthorized access.
Privacy denotes anyone who feels free from some unwanted attention.	Security is some state of being free through possible threats or private freedom.
Privacy programs concentrate on protection personal information just like passwords, log-in credentials, etc.	The security programs defines the set of regulations and protocols to secure each confidential information resources and assets that an enterprise owns and collects.
Privacy defines protecting sensitive information associated to individuals and organisations.	Security supports protection for some types of data and information such as the ones that are saved electronically.
To a few extent, privacy is implemented with the initiatives of security and security depends on the phpMyAdmin privacy of access and credentials of information.	The three primary security principles are enhancing the accessibility of information and data, maintaining the integrity of data assets, and protecting confidentiality.
Privacy programs concentrate on protection personal information only like passwords, log-in credentials, etc.	The security programs defines the set of regulations and protocols to secure each confidential information resources and assets that an enterprise owns and collects.
Privacy can’t be adept without security.	Security can be adept without privacy.

What is the difference between Privacy and Security?

What is the difference between privacy and data security and how should that difference affect the way we use customer data?

Compliance/regulations – Regulations such as HIPAA, and the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard seek to protect data and to prevent the unauthorized disclosure of data by combining data protection, data security and data privacy into a comprehensive data management strategy.

GDPR is a set of data privacy laws enacted by the EU to ensure consumer privacy.
These laws force organizations to disclose their data collection efforts and help ensure consumer privacy by giving consumers the right to determine how their data can be used, while also imposing penalties upon organizations for data breaches.

Of course, GDPR isn’t the only data protection regulation. In the United States, healthcare providers are subject to, which are also designed to ensure the safety and privacy of personally identifiable healthcare data. GDPR, HIPAA and similar regulations set up data privacy standards while outlining requirements that organizations must put in place to ensure data protection and data security.

Is data privacy and data security are of the same meaning?

Summary – In conclusion, data security and data privacy are two different concepts with various areas of overlap. Data security is about protecting the availability and integrity of data, while data privacy concerns your data’s confidentiality and use,

Data security covers policies, methods, and the means to protect personal data, while data privacy deals with how that protected data is used. It’s essential to understand both concepts and their differences because you’ll be expected to implement policies within your company that address them. Data protection and privacy laws are increasing globally and in the level of strictness with which businesses are expected to comply.

As a business owner, you should employ best practices for both data security and privacy to ensure compliance with major legislation like the GDPR and the CCPA.

What is the relationship between privacy and security 5 points?

What is the Difference between Security and Privacy? – Security is about the safeguarding of data, whereas privacy is about the safeguarding of user identity. The specific differences, however, are more complex, and there can certainly be areas of overlap between the two.

Security refers to protection against the unauthorized access of data. We put security controls in place to limit who can access the information. Privacy is harder to define, in part because user-specific details can also be secure data. In the coming month, we will have a blog with more information on Personally Identifiable Information (PII).

For example, hospital and clinic staff use secure systems to communicate with patients about their health, instead of sending information via personal email accounts. This type of data transmission is an example of security. On the other hand, privacy provisions, might limit patient health record access to specific hospital staff members, such as doctors, nurses, and medical assistants.

What are the 3 most important aspects of information security?

What is the CIA triad? – When we discuss data and information, we must consider the CIA triad. The CIA triad refers to an information security model made up of the three main components: confidentiality, integrity and availability. Each component represents a fundamental objective of information security. The three components of the CIA triad are discussed below:

Confidentiality: This component is often associated with secrecy and the use of encryption. Confidentiality in this context means that the data is only available to authorized parties. When information has been kept confidential it means that it has not been compromised by other parties; confidential data are not disclosed to people who do not require them or who should not have access to them. Ensuring confidentiality means that information is organized in terms of who needs to have access, as well as the sensitivity of the data. A breach of confidentiality may take place through different means, for instance hacking or social engineering. Integrity: Data integrity refers to the certainty that the data is not tampered with or degraded during or after submission. It is the certainty that the data has not been subject to unauthorized modification, either intentional or unintentional. There are two points during the transmission process during which the integrity could be compromised: during the upload or transmission of data or during the storage of the document in the database or collection. Availability: This means that the information is available to authorized users when it is needed. For a system to demonstrate availability, it must have properly functioning computing systems, security controls and communication channels. Systems defined as critical (power generation, medical equipment, safety systems) often have extreme requirements related to availability. These systems must be resilient against cyber threats, and have safeguards against power outages, hardware failures and other events that might impact the system availability.

WHAT is IT security and why is it important?

Sensitive data is one of an organisation’s most important assets, so it makes sense that you prioritise its security. Information security is “the practice of preventing unauthorized access, use, disclosure, disruption, modification, inspection, recording or destruction” of sensitive records. Security measures perform four critical roles:

It protects the organisation’s ability to function.
It enables the safe operation of applications implemented on the organisation’s IT systems.
It protects the data the organisation collects and uses.
It safeguards the technology the organisation uses.

What is the difference between data privacy and cyber security?

Data privacy can be defined as the proper handling of sensitive user data. Data privacy consists of whether the data is encrypted at rest and in transit. The decision of when and how data will be shared with a third party is the realm of data privacy. Lastly it ensures the user’s data collection, storage, and usage adheres to all regulatory standards such as GDPR, CCPA, or HIPAA.

Let’s take a look at a couple ways an organization can ensure the privacy of their users’ data.

What is the difference between information security and?

Difference between Cyber Security and Information Security

Improve Article Save Article Like Article

The terms Cyber Security and are often used interchangeably. As they both are responsible for the security and protecting the computer system from threats and information breaches and often Cybersecurity and information security are so closely linked that they may seem synonymous and unfortunately, they are used synonymously.

If we talk about data security it’s all about securing the data from malicious users and threats.
Now another question is what is the difference between Data and Information? So one important point is that “not every data can be information” data can be informed if it is interpreted in a context and given meaning.

for example “100798” is data and if we know that it’s the date of birth of a person then it is information because it has some meaning. so information means data that has some meaning. Examples and Inclusion of Cyber Security are as follows:

Network SecurityApplication SecurityCloud SecurityCritical Infrastructure

Examples and inclusion of Information Security are as follows:

Procedural ControlsAccess ControlsTechnical ControlsCompliance Controls


Parameters	CYBER SECURITY	INFORMATION SECURITY
Basic Definition	It is the practice of protecting the data from outside the resource on the internet.	It is all about protecting information from unauthorized users, access, and data modification or removal in order to provide confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Protect	It is about the ability to protect the use of cyberspace from cyber attacks.	It deals with the protection of data from any form of threat.
Scope	Cybersecurity to protect anything in the cyber realm.	Information security is for information irrespective of the realm.
Threat	Cybersecurity deals with the danger in cyberspace.	Information security deals with the protection of data from any form of threat.
Attacks	Cybersecurity strikes against Cyber crimes, cyber frauds, and law enforcement.	Information security strikes against unauthorized access, disclosure modification, and disruption.
Professionals	Cyber security professionals deal with the prevention of active threats or Advanced Persistent threats (APT).	Information security professionals are the foundation of data security and security professionals associated with it are responsible for policies, processes, and organizational roles and responsibilities that assure confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Deals with	It deals with threats that may or may not exist in the cyber realm such as protecting your social media account, personal information, etc.	It deals with information Assets and integrity, confidentiality, and availability.
Defense	Acts as first line of defense.	Comes into play when security is breached.

Diagrams are given below to represent the difference between Information Security and Cybersecurity, What Is The Difference Between Privacy Law And Information Systems Security How Are They Related In the above diagram, ICT refers to Information and communications technology (ICT) which is an extensional term for information technology (IT) that defines the role of unified communications and the integration of telecommunications (basically digital communication security). : Difference between Cyber Security and Information Security