When Is It Okay To Break The Law?

When Is It Okay To Break The Law
Is it acceptable to break the law under certain circumstances? Law is defined as; the system of rules that a particular country or community recognizes as regulating the actions of its members and may enforce by the imposition of penalties. It should be acceptable to bend the law if it is used for good intentions.

Laws are meant to keep people safe, but under certain conditions they are over controlling, and they need to be broken. It can be beneficial or even life saving at times to break the law, but it is not acceptable to break the law at all times. There are exceptions to the law, and they need to be recognized when the time is right.

Imagine if a government started to kill its own people in an uncontrollable and psychotic manner. This would be a time where the people would have to rebel, or fight back, against the governing body in control. The law would be broken because attacks to this scale would be illegal, but it is all in an effort to save harmless civilians being murdered by an irrational higher power.

  1. If the innocent people do not break the law and fight back, then more innocent people die and it creates a more unsafe environment.
  2. The law needs to be show more content These people believe that the law is too threatening to find any loophole for the greater safety of people.
  3. However, these people do not see that there are justifications to the law in some cases that are positive and are for the good/safety of people.

For example, driving over the speed limit, or recklessly, to rush someone in critical condition to the hospital would be a time when justifying the law would be acceptable with the intention of saving a life. The driving illegally for someone’s safety would also be acceptable if a woman is in labor and needs to get to the hospital as quickly as possible before she gives birth.

When if ever is it acceptable to break the law?

A citizen’s duty – Another argument that we would be reluctant to accept is that a duty to obey the law is built into citizenship. According to this argument, the fact we are Australians, whether we chose to be or not, means we have a duty to obey the law – disobedience would be un-Australian.

We might doubt, though, that mere membership of a political community entails a duty to obey its laws. Whether the community is just surely matters too though. If it did not, we would have to conclude that the citizens of Nazi Germany had a duty to obey their law. These are just a few of the arguments McManus’s critics might offer in support of their assumption that we have a duty to obey the law.

Suppose we are unconvinced by neither these arguments nor any others they could offer. What follows? As McManus says, we should do what the law requires only “when the law is fair and the law is right”. We might, of course, think that the laws that regulate industrial action are right and so should not be broken.

  • But that has not been the claim of McManus’ critics.
  • Suppose, though, we are convinced by at least one of the arguments for a duty to obey the law.
  • Would disobedience then be wrong? Not necessarily.
  • Even if there is a duty to obey the law, it might be trumped in specific cases by considerations of justice.
See also:  Where To Cast Law Of Regression Elden Ring?

Even if there is such a duty, then, unlawful strikes, whistle-blowing and other acts of disobedience might be justified. Indeed, an Attorney-General’s refusal to hand over his diary might even be justified. Dr Kevin Walton is a Senior Lecturer in the Sydney Law School with an expertise in legal philosophy.

Is it okay to break unjust laws?

Quotes – “If the injustice is part of the necessary friction of the machine of government, let it go, let it go: perchance it will wear smooth–certainly the machine will wear out but if it is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then I say, break the law.

  • Let your life be a counter-friction to stop the machine.
  • What I have to do is to see, at any rate, that I do not lend myself to the wrong which I condemn.” – Henry David Thoreau, Civil Disobedience “An individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for the law” – Martin Luther King, Jr.

“An unjust law is itself a species of violence. Arrest for its breach is more so. Now the law of nonviolence says that violence should be resisted not by counter-violence but by nonviolence. This I do by breaking the law and by peacefully submitting to arrest and imprisonment.” – Mahatma Gandhi “One has not only a legal, but a moral responsibility to obey just laws.

What happens if you break the law without knowing?

In general, there is no requirement that someone know that what they are doing is illegal in order to be convicted of a crime.

What is it called when you break a law?

synonym study for breach – 2, Breach, infraction, violation, transgression all denote in some way the breaking of a rule or law or the upsetting of a normal and desired state. Breach is used infrequently in reference to laws or rules, more often in connection with desirable conditions or states of affairs: a breach of the peace, of good manners, of courtesy.

  1. Infraction most often refers to clearly formulated rules or laws: an infraction of the criminal code, of university regulations, of a labor contract.
  2. Violation, a stronger term than either of the preceding two, often suggests intentional, even forceful or aggressive, refusal to obey the law or to respect the rights of others: repeated violations of parking regulations; a human rights violation.

Transgression, with its root sense of “a stepping across (of a boundary of some sort),” applies to any behavior that exceeds the limits imposed by a law, especially a moral law, a commandment, or an order; it often implies sinful behavior: a serious transgression of social customs, of God’s commandments.

How do you know if you’re in trouble with the law?

You Could Request a Warrant Check and Ask for a Copy of the Police Report – If you suspect you may have been charged even though you haven’t been arrested or received any summons, you can always contact your local police department for information. By asking the department to conduct a warrant check, you can uncover any criminal charges that have been filed against you.

  1. It’s important to note that the police are not required to inform you of any ongoing investigations against you.
  2. However, if charges have officially been filed, you have the right to request a copy of the police report from the District Attorney’s Office so you understand what you have been accused of.
See also:  According To Little'S Law, Which Of The Following Ratios Is Used To Find Throughput Rate?

The police report should contain information about who else is involved in the case and a description of the incident, though some details may be blacked out to protect witnesses or victims. Remember, it is best to have an attorney handle any communication with law enforcement on your behalf.

What is the perfect law that sets you free?

In today’s ever-expanding secular society people eagerly embrace liberty, defining it as “absolute freedom,” and insisting that they have the right to live as they please. There are no constraints because their “self-defined” right to freedom justifies whatever they choose to do.

Such twisted thinking produces a world without boundaries, where adults, as well as children, have difficulty discerning right from wrong. What we often forget is that liberty is unequivocally tied to responsibility. More liberty demands more accountability. Jesus confirmed that premise in the parable of the wise steward in Luke 12 when He said “For unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required:” (v.48).

Believers must be very careful to define Christian Liberty properly, and to exercise it cautiously. Galatians 5 provides crucial guidance for that pursuit. Principle # 1: Christian Liberty is granted by the Savior. Galatians 5:1 declares our possession of liberty: “Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.” We are free from “the yoke of bondage,” which is, according to Romans 8:2, the “law of sin and death.” We likewise understand that believers are no longer bound by the requirements of the Levitical law because Christ has set us free (Rom.7:6).

No believer has a right to Christian liberty. It is a precious gift, offered freely to those who are willing to accept it. It is only available because Jesus was gracious enough to take our place on the cross.

Principle # 2: Christian Liberty is governed by the Scripture. Galatians 5:13 defines the limitations of our liberty: “For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another.” There were some believers in Galatia (just as there are today) who were abusing their liberty, using it as justification for engaging in fleshly pursuits, which scripture clearly condemns.

No believer has a right to use his liberty for selfish pursuits. Liberty frees us from the bondage of sinful, selfish desires and allows us to embrace the “mind of Christ” (Php.2:5-8). Loving our neighbor will motivate us to serve our neighbor.

Principle #3: Christian Liberty is guided by the Spirit. Galatians 5:22-23 describe the characteristics of our liberty: “But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law.” Such “fruit” is only available to those who are willing to “live in the Spirit,” and “walk in the Spirit” (Gal.5:25).

See also:  According To The Law Of Supply When Prices Increase?

No believer has a right to exercise his liberty according to his personal philosophy. The moment our desire becomes a priority we lose our liberty.

Our society has become a much more dangerous place because people have determined that they have a right to live as they please, insisting that no individual or authority is entitled to restrict their desires or activities. They have embraced the faulty notion that requiring accountability somehow violates their rights.

Children, who are being taught at a very young age to defy anyone who “violates their rights” grow up believing they are accountable to no one. Sadly, many believers have embraced a similar philosophy. Christian liberty allows us to live, move, and serve the Lord with purpose. Its characteristics are dictated by scripture and managed by the indwelling Spirit of God.

It does not permit a believer to self-determine priorities and choices in his life. Liberty without accountability leads to anarchy. Our nation is well on its way. Believers shouldn’t be contributing to the problem. Read more at terryhyman.net

Who is the best lawyer of all time?

#1 Abraham Lincoln – Abraham Lincoln was an American politician, and lawyer who became the 16th president of the United States of America. He passed the bar in 1836 in Springfield, Illinois, and began working under his wife’s cousin, John T. Stuart. Lincoln represented clients in both civil and criminal matters. In all, Lincoln and his partners handled over 5,000 cases.

Can you break the law to save a life?

Briefly, you can break any law if doing so prevents more human death and injury than following the law would have.

Why do some youth break laws?

Lack of social and moral values can lead children to poor interaction with others and make them less confident. They may become selfish and arrogant. They would not know how to respect the laws of the state. Parents often neglect their children and pay more focus on working hard to earn money for them.

Why should we not break laws?

Answer: Why it’s not okay to break the law? Breaking the law by stealing from others or by assaulting others is never acceptable. A person must break the law not because it is convenient to do so, but because they sincerely believe the law is unjust. Finally, they must be willing to take the consequences of breaking the law.

What is the effect of breaking laws?

The Consequences of Breaking the Law When Is It Okay To Break The Law When an individual is responsible for engaging in a criminal offense and breaking laws, he/she will experience consequences of his/her actions. There are many different types of crimes in which an individual may partake. Each crime involves different actions of varying severity.

  1. As a result, each crime will result in a different criminal punishment.
  2. When an individual is convicted of a criminal offense, there are three primary punishments that he/she will be issued: community service, a fine, or imprisonment.
  3. Frequently, if an individual has committed a minor misdemeanor offense, he/she will be required to complete community service or pay a specified fine.

However, more serious offenses, including burglary, assault, and drug related offenses, are frequently addressed with incarceration. The period of incarceration will vary significantly. First time non-violent offenders may only be required to remain in jail for a few years.