When Tyranny Becomes Law Rebellion Becomes Duty Quote?

When Tyranny Becomes Law Rebellion Becomes Duty Quote
‘When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty’ (‘ When injustice is law, rebellion is duty’ ).

Who Said rebellion to tyranny is obedience to God?

One of Jefferson’s seals The seal pictured to the right was identified as “one of Mr.J.’s seals” by Thomas Jefferson’s grandson-in-law Nicholas Philip Trist, It bears the motto, “Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.” Jefferson’s memorandum book contains the notation, “Pd.

  • Thomson for a seal £3-7″ on March 26, 1786, perhaps referring to the purchase of the seal shown here.
  • The first known intact copy of the seal is on a letter to Richard Gem from April 1790.
  • The seal appears on the frontispiece of Henry Randall’s Life of Thomas Jefferson, and can also be seen on one of the gates to the Monticello graveyard,

“Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God” was a motto suggested, but not used, for the Seal of the United States, Jefferson eventually appropriated it for his own seal. The source of the motto as used by Jefferson is likely Benjamin Franklin,

Who does King quote when he says that an unjust law is no law at all?

Martin Luther King Jr. is a symbol of peace, justice and nonviolence, but he is often misquoted, misunderstood and invoked for nefarious purposes that have nothing to do with his legacy. While many like to speak of King’s “dream” and his commitment to peace, part of remembering him means understanding his belief that society has a responsibility to disobey unjust laws.

And right now in America, we have become the land of unjust laws and policies — from voter suppression to bans on teaching race and racism. In his ” Letter from Birmingham Jail,” King said we have a duty to disobey unjust laws. “I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws. One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws,” he wrote.

“Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that ‘an unjust law is no law at all.'” King was unwavering in advocating for civil disobedience to break systems of oppression — disobeying unjust laws in the open, and with love.

  1. What is an unjust law? According to King, it’s one that degrades rather than uplifts humanity.
  2. Jim Crow segregation statutes were a prime example of unjust laws because “segregation distorts the soul and damages the personality,” as King noted.
  3. It gives the segregator a false sense of superiority and the segregated a false sense of inferiority.” A law is also unjust if a numerical majority or a power majority imposes it on a minority yet the majority does not have to follow the law.

King used specific examples to make his point. Internationally, he pointed to Germany, writing: “We should never forget that everything Adolf Hitler did in Germany was ‘legal.’, It was ‘illegal’ to aid and comfort a Jew in Hitler’s Germany.” And, of course, sitting in a Birmingham jail cell, he spoke of how Alabama’s segregation laws that prevented Black citizens from voting were put in place by an undemocratically elected state Legislature (a power majority).

  1. He pointed to the fact that not a single Black person was registered to vote even in some majority-Black counties.
  2. While he did not advocate lawbreaking, or as he said “evading or defying the law” like the “rabid segregationist,” King was unwavering in advocating for civil disobedience to break systems of oppression — disobeying unjust laws in the open, and with love.

After all, he believed that those who passively accepted evil without protesting it are perpetuating it and cooperating with it. “I submit that an individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for law,” King insisted.

This is a side of him that has been glossed over or even conveniently left out of the conversation. Meanwhile, there are people today who support unjust laws yet invoke King’s name when it is convenient. Supporting policies that directly oppose King’s dream for America, they cherry-pick his words without context to justify unjust laws.

Nothing about King’s actions or rhetoric — no matter how some may try to twist them — indicates that he would be satisfied with where America is on civil rights today. Sens. Kyrsten Sinema, D-Ariz., and Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., claim to support voting rights and to celebrate King’s vision and honor his legacy of freedom, justice and equality, yet they refuse to change the Senate filibuster rule that would allow for crucial voting rights legislation to pass and preserve multiracial democracy.

  • Sinema and Manchin exemplify the white moderate King described, that “great stumbling block” against Black freedom “who is more devoted to ‘order’ than to justice” and believes now is not a convenient time for freedom.
  • In a 1963 interview, King cited the filibuster as stalling the Civil Rights Act of 1964: “I think the tragedy is that we have a Congress with a Senate that has a minority of misguided senators who will use the filibuster to keep the majority of people from even voting.” That same year at the March on Washington, King said: “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.” GOP lawmakers who justified, supported or enabled the Jan.6 insurrection and appealed to white nationalists — such as Sen.

Josh Hawley of Missouri, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy of California and Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin — have quoted and twisted King’s “I Have a Dream” speech to attack critical race theory and deny the existence of systemic racism. Florida Gov.

See also:  When To Apply To Law School For Fall 2019?

Ron DeSantis, a Republican, name-dropped King last month in announcing an anti-critical race theory bill called the Stop Woke Act. The legislation would allow private parties, such as students, parents, employees and businesses, to sue schools and workplaces that teach critical race theory. “You think about what MLK stood for,” DeSantis said.

“He said he didn’t want people judged on the color of their skin but on the content of their character.” Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp called King “a transformational leader” and “a true American hero” who recognized “great injustice in this world” and took “the necessary steps to right that wrong.” Yet Kemp sat under a painting of a slave plantation as he signed a voter suppression law making it a crime to give food and water to people waiting in line to vote.

  • In Texas — where the Legislature removed King from the state curriculum and ended the requirement to teach that the Ku Klux Klan was morally wrong — Sen.
  • Ted Cruz praised King’s fight against racial inequality and injustice,
  • This is the same person who has thrown his unwavering support behind Donald Trump, a president who denigrated Black women, whose administration operated migrant detention centers that one member of Congress compared to concentration camps and who advocated for measures that contribute to voter suppression,

Now is the time to remember that King, though nonviolent, was not a pushover. People in the U.S. are witnessing how the future of the country’s multiracial democracy is at stake because of unjust laws that aim to further ostracize marginalized voices. And we shouldn’t just stand aside and watch it happen.

We can use the power of our vote and our voices to hold elected officials accountable. Nothing about King’s actions or rhetoric — no matter how some may try to twist them — indicates that he would be satisfied with where America is on civil rights today. David A. Love David A. Love, a faculty member in journalism and media studies at the Rutgers University School of Communication and Information, is a writer based in Philadelphia.

He writes about race, politics and justice issues.

Do citizens have an obligation to protest injustice or unjust laws?

Our founding fathers acted in civil disobedience – If the founders hadn’t argued that individuals have natural rights and that God does not grant rights to kings or queens to then rule their subjects, they would have had little authority or basis to overturn Great Britain’s rule of law and the monarchy’s similarly self-proclaimed divine right to rule.

  1. For the founders, government is always subservient to the natural rights of individuals, cannot possess natural rights because it is a non-natural institution, and only possesses its authority to rule from the consent of the governed.
  2. Thus, the founders’ signing of the Declaration of Independence was an assertion of their natural rights to suspend their civil obligations to Great Britain.

It was also an act of civil disobedience that gave rise to seven years of temporary anarchy during the Revolutionary War. Hear more Tennessee Voices: While the founders set a precedent for civil disobedience and temporary anarchy, the former should always be preferential to the latter for two reasons. Your state. Your stories. Support more reporting like this. A subscription gives you unlimited access to stories across Tennessee that make a difference in your life and the lives of those around you. To the first point, anarchy, however temporary, is always dangerous to people’s lives, property, and everything they hold dear. It is also dangerous because it can lead to permanent anarchy, thus civil disobedience while requiring great sacrifice and patience respects the natural rights of individuals over their destruction. For these reasons, hyper-moralized cries from alleged social reformers to overturn the bourgeoisie are suspect. Second, practitioners of civil disobedience are exercising enormous self-restraint to provide the space for stakeholders sitting on the sidelines to decide whether they will join in solidarity. Growing consensus is necessary to render an unjust law moot. History is replete with governments claiming classes of people as threats to its survival and legislating morality to condemn or disenfranchise the other. Often, this force is applied arbitrarily, or even worse than arbitrarily because it is political. History, however, is also replete with instances of individuals practicing civil disobedience to suspend the misapplication of power, including the Nashville sit-ins or Mahatma Gandhi’s Salt March. Ultimately, these heroes only had their internal convictions of injustice when the inherent righteousness and force of governments militate against them. In the face of injustice, all people have the right and moral obligation to peacefully disobey unjust laws. When depends on whether the level of immorality, oppression, and violence is untenable. Dean Balaes is a 2019 graduate of Vanderbilt Divinity School and Law School. He works for a law firm in New York City. : History shows when civil disobedience takes place, revolutions occur | Opinion

What did Lincoln say about overthrowing the government?

Democracy – “Let every American, every lover of liberty, every well wisher to his posterity, swear by the blood of the Revolution, never to violate in the least particular, the laws of the country; and never to tolerate their violation by others.”

Address Before the Young Men’s Lyceum of Springfield, January 27, 1838

“Let every man remember that to violate the law is to trample on the blood of his father, and to tear the charter of his own and his children’s liberty.”

Address Before the Young Men’s Lyceum of Springfield, January 27, 1838

“At what point shall we expect the approach of danger? By what means shall we fortify against it? Shall we expect some transatlantic military giant, to step the Ocean, and crush us at a blow? Never! All the armies of Europe, Asia and Africa combined, with all the treasure of the earth (our own excepted) in their military chest; with a Buonaparte for a commander, could not by force, take a drink from the Ohio, or make a track on the Blue Ridge, in a trial of a thousand years.

See also:  What Temperature Scale Must Be Used When Applying Charles Law?

Address Before the Young Men’s Lyceum of Springfield, January 27, 1838

“Determine that the thing can and shall be done, and then we shall find the way.”

Speech in the House of Representatives, June 20, 1848

“In leaving the people’s business in their own hands, we cannot be wrong.”

Speech in the House of Representatives, July 27, 1848

“The legitimate object of government is ‘to do for the people what needs to be done, but which they can not, by individual effort, do at all, or do so well, for themselves’.”

Fragment on Government, circa July 1, 1854

“Most governments have been based, practically, on the denial of equal rights of menours began, by affirming those rights. They said, some men are too ignorant, and vicious, to share in government. Possibly so, said we; and, by your system, you would always keep them ignorant, and vicious, to share in government.

Fragment on slavery, circa July 1854

“According to our ancient faith, the just powers of governments are derived from the consent of the governed.”

Speech at Peoria, October 16, 1854

“When the white man governs himself, that is self-government; but when he governs himself and also governs another man, that is more than self-government – that is despotism.”

Speech at Peoria, October 16, 1854

“If there is anything which it is the duty of the whole people to never entrust to any hands but their own, that thing is the preservation and perpetuity of their own liberties and institutions.”

Speech at Peoria, October 16, 1854

“No man is good enough to govern another man without that other’s consent. I say this is the leading principle – the sheet anchor of American republicanism.”

Speech at Peoria, October 16, 1854

“As I would not be a slave, so I would not be a master. This expresses my idea of democracy. Whatever differs from this, to the extent of the difference, is no democracy.”

Fragment on Democracy, August 1, 1858

“Understanding the spirit of our institutions to aim at the elevation of men, I am opposed to whatever tends to degrade them.”

Letter to Theodore Canisius, May 17, 1859

“The people – the people – are the rightful masters of both congresses and courts – not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it.”

Speech in Kansas, December 1859

“I do not mean to say that this government is charged with the duty of redressing or preventing all the wrongs in the world; but I do think that it is charged with the duty of preventing and redressing all wrongs which are wrongs to itself.”

Speech at Cincinnati, September 17, 1859

“Why should there not be a patient confidence in the ultimate justice of the people? IS there any better ore qual hope in the world?”

First Inaugural Address, March 4, 1861

“The people will save their government, if the government itself will do its part only indifferently well.”

Special Message to Congress, July 4, 1861

“It is as much the duty of government to render prompt justice against itself, in favor of citizens, as it is to administer the same between private individuals.”

Annual Message to Congress, December 3, 1861

“The people’s will, constitutionally expressed, is the ultimate law for all.”

Response to Serenade, October 19, 1864

“It is said that we have the best government the world ever knew, and I am glad to meet you, the supporters of that government.”

Speech to the 164th Ohio Regiment, October 24, 1864

“It has long been a grave question whether any government, not too strong for the liberties of its people, can be strong enough to maintain its own existence, in great emergencies.”

Response to a Serenade, November 10, 1864

What was Woodrow Wilson’s famous quote?

Respected as a scholar and writer in his own time, Woodrow Wilson has become famous for some pithy quotes. Oftentimes, though, his original thoughts can get lost in the desire to share something short and sweet. So we thought it was time to share some background and sources for some Wilson sayings you might have heard Let us know if you have heard any other good quotes from Wilson you would like us to track down.

Just a warning though: Woodrow Wilson did not say everything attributed to him, and sometimes real quotes have become garbled or misused. “If you want to make enemies, try to change something.” Address to Salesmanship Congress in Detroit, 1916 July 10 – I have found that I had a great deal more resistance when I tried to help business than when I tried to interfere with it.

I have had a great deal more resistance of counsel, of special counsel, when I tried to alter the things that are established than when I tried to do anything else. We call ourselves a liberal nation, whereas, as a matter of fact, we are one of the most conservative nations in the world.

If you want to make enemies, try to change something. You know why it is. To do things to-day exactly the way you did them yesterday saves thinking. It does not cost you anything. You have acquired the habit; you know the routine; you do not have to plan anything, and it frightens you with a hint of exertion to learn that you will have to do it a different way to-morrow.

State of the Union Address, 1919 December 2 – There can be no settled conditions leading to increased production and a reduction in the cost of living if labor and capital are to be antagonists instead of partners. Sound thinking and an honest desire to serve the interests of the whole nation, as distinguished from the interests of a class, must be applied to the solution of this great and pressing problem.

The failure of other nations to consider this matter in a vigorous way has produced bitterness and jealousies and antagonisms, the food of radicalism. The only way to keep men from agitating against grievances is to remove the grievances. An unwillingness even to discuss these matters produces only dissatisfaction and gives comfort to the extreme elements in our country which endeavor to stir up disturbances in order to provoke governments to embark upon a course of retaliation and repression.

The seed of revolution is repression. The remedy for these things must not be negative in character. “America is not anything if it consists of each of us. It is something only if it consists of all of us.” An Address in Pittsburgh on Preparedness, 1916 January 29.

  1. Addresses of President Wilson, January 27-February 3, 1916.
  2. Page 13 – We want the spirit of America to be efficient.
  3. We want American character to be efficient.
  4. We want American character to display itself in what I may perhaps be allowed to call spiritual efficiency—clear, disinterested thinking and fearless action along the right lines of thought.
See also:  Which Of The Following Is True Of The Law Of Supply?

America is nothing if it consists merely of each of us; it is something only if it consists of all of us. And it cannot consist of all of us unless our spirits are banded together in a common enterprise. That common enterprise is the enterprise of liberty and justice and right.

Therefore, I, for my part, have a great enthusiasm for rendering America spiritually efficient, and that conception lies at the basis of what seems very far removed from it, namely, the plans that have been proposed for the military efficiency of this Leaders of Men speech given several times. See the Woodrow Wilson Papers, Vol.6, pages 646-671, for a 1890 June 17 example – The constituent habit of a people inheres in its thought, and to that thought legislation-even the legislation that advances and modifies habit-must keep very near.

The ear of the leader must ring with the voices of the people. He cannot be of the school of the prophets; he must be of the number of those who studiously serve the slow-paced daily demand. Address to the New York Press Club, 1912 September 9. Crossroads of Freedom: The 1912 Speeches of Woodrow Wilson.

  1. Page 130. See also the Woodrow Wilson Papers, Vol.25, pages 118-128 Liberty has never come from the government.
  2. Liberty has always come from the subjects of the government.
  3. The history of liberty is a history of resistance.
  4. The history of liberty is a history of the limitation of governmental power, not the increase of it.

Do these gentlemen dream that in the year 1912 we have discovered a unique exception to the movement of human history? Do they dream that the whole character of those who exercise power has changed, that it is no longer a temptation? Above all things else, do they dream that men are bred great enough now to be a Providence over the people over whom they preside?

What was Winston Churchill most famous quote?

Winston Churchill – Top Twelve Quotes was not only a great wartime leader but also a Nobel laureate, statesman, bon viveur and celebrated wit. Voted the greatest Briton of all time in a 2002 poll for the BBC, Churchill was as famous for his turn of phrase as he was for his political career. Many of his most famous quotes are from the war years and a recurring theme of his speeches was the need for perseverance. A lot of these can be applied equally well to our everyday life:

“Never, never, never give up.”

“If you’re going through hell, keep going.”

Regarding society and his fellow man (or woman), Churchill had a great deal of advice:

“All the greatest things are simple, and many can be expressed in a single word: freedom; justice; honour; duty; mercy; hope.”

“Attitude is a little thing that makes a big difference.”

On politics:

“Politics is the ability to foretell what is going to happen tomorrow, next week, next month and next year. And to have the ability afterwards to explain why it didn’t happen”

“When the eagles are silent, the parrots begin to jabber.”

As for the man himself, he was well known for his love for cigars, food and drink, and in particular, champagne and brandy:

“All I can say is that I have taken more out of alcohol than alcohol has taken out of me.”

Regarding his wife Clementine:

“My most brilliant achievement was my ability to be able to persuade my wife to marry me.”

On animals:

“I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.”

We also couldn’t resist including a couple of quotes which may well be apocryphal:

“I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I will be sober and you will still be ugly.”

Lady Astor to Churchill: “If I were married to you, I’d put poison in your coffee.” Reply: “If I were married to you, I’d drink it.”

And finally, as a website celebrating the history of Britain, we just had to share this quote:

“The farther backward you can look, the farther forward you are likely to see.”

: Winston Churchill – Top Twelve Quotes

What is Ernest Hemingway’s most famous quote?

‘ There is no friend as loyal as a book.’